The Trump University scandal graduates to the front pages
- Thread starter signalmankenneth
- Start date
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
That's the difference between someone who lies, and a pathological liar.
Are you Yurt? You have his stubborn, tiring thing.
You're moving the goal posts. You didn't say he was pathological. Regardless, both are liars, but you claim she isn't one.
If anyone is being stubborn it is you. You seriously never back down, even when shown you're wrong, you just say, well, because I say so. I guess you had a thing with Yurt too. Seems many on this board can't get over the guy.
If anyone is being stubborn it is you. You seriously never back down, even when shown you're wrong, you just say, well, because I say so. I guess you had a thing with Yurt too. Seems many on this board can't get over the guy.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
I haven't been shown I'm wrong, and I am not moving the goalposts.
Saying that lying IS who someone is = saying they're a pathological liar. I'm not sure how it's possible to confuse that. Like I said, you only accepted it when I used the clinical term - but the description should have been enough.
I've never seen anyone split hairs like you. You're moving it by saying he is pathological. A liar is someone who tells lies, you admit Hillary tells lies but say she is not a liar, it is just what she does. Trump lies, and you have no problem calling him a liar.
You're hysterical.
Leonthecat
Racism Watchdog
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
You should look back over the discussion. You're the one who has tried to claim this entire time that there is no difference between anyone who lies. If they lie they lie, and that makes them all the same.
Clearly, there are degrees. You seem to be in agreement that a pathological liar (someone who is ABOUT lying) is a different degree than someone who just lies. Which you could have agreed to right away, btw, instead of going through this somewhat rigorous & futile exercise.
this is why you are retarded. Hillary put top secret information in jeopardy. It can very easily be argued she violated the espionage act. FBI may very well reccomend she be indicted. Anyone that isn't hillary would be in jail for life at this point. What hillary did is objectively worse by every single measure, according to how the courts would punish these to things. You either aren't paying attention or you are just a dummy.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
It's the classic tempest in a teacup.
It's not dumb at all to see Trump's faults as much more dangerous than Hillary's.
it is dumb. We are talking about top secret information being on a shitty home server when you are the SoS. We are talking about her "pathologically" lying for years about what she did and why she did it, completely callously. The SoS had to actually shut down her email multiple times cause it was routinely being hacked. And she lied about all of this because she put her own political ambition over the saftey of the nation. That's who hillary clinton is. This trump U story is made for lemmings like yourself to distract from the fact that Clinton may actually be indicted. The only way she doesn't get indicted is politics. You described trump is a grifter. I am describing clinton as a criminal.
The problem is dopes like you have just associated this email thing as another benghazi, something that isn't actually there. Clinton has played you guys by calling it "a mistake"... which is ludacris as it would be like a murderer saying "I clearly should have done things differently, it was a mistake but we have to talk about blah blah blah" And you guys hear mistake and downplay it in your minds. To a T I have yet to talk to one person on JPP that is informed of the email issue. Clueless rubes.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
You've got a bit of "know it all" in you, but it sounds like you get a lot of information from biased sources, and reach biased conclusions.
I think what Hillary did was careless, and nothing more. You seem to think it was some sort of deliberate attempt to aid our enemies. The right-wing blogs trumpet it as some sort of egregious threat to our national security, but I think something like invading Iraq made us much more vulnerable than anything that could have come out of those emails. I also think dissolving NATO, or having a loose nuke policy, or staring down China in a trade ultimatum, or alienating our Muslim allies, or pretty much anything that Trump has proposed on the foreign policy front will put us in far greater danger.
It's all a lot of bluster that plays to the Hillary-hating crowd. I get that you were sucked into it, but it is what it is.
nah. the aiding our enemies was just a byproduct. It was done to avoid freedom of information requests so she would have no accountability.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
clintons own statements disprove that what she did was careless absent mindedness. You need to pay more attention.
No I don't think she made a deliberate attempt to aid our enemies. That's completely irrelevant though. Nor is it the issue.
Cancel 2020.1
Canceled
u mad, bro?
Your statement means Trump is not a pathological liar.
signalmankenneth
Verified User
WATCH: A Retired Veteran Tells CNN How Trump University Scammed Him out of $26,000
The "university" took Felicisimo Limon's money and gave him almost nothing in return.
We’re going to be hearing a lot more about Trump University in the coming days, especially after a judge whom Trump had bashed for being a “Mexican” recently ordered the release [3] of several internal Trump U. documents that will be out by the end of the week. CNN spent some time talking with some former Trump University students who described how the “university” took $26,000 of his money and gave him almost nothing in return.
Felicisimo Limon, a retired Navy veteran of 40 years, took a free introductory seminar that convinced him to invest in taking real estate courses at the “school.” However, after five days of “instruction,” he says that he didn’t learn any useful information and was constantly pressured by instructors to pay even more money than what he’d already forked over.
“What the heck are you talking about, more money and I’m not learning anything?” Limon asked rhetorically, before explaining that the courses taught no special real estate secrets or techniques. In fact, CNN says that the only thing somewhat useful he learned about was the benefit of “paying off the unpaid tax benefits of elderly people, keeping them in their homes until they die, but then taking ownership of the property.” Limon said he found this idea to be immoral, which was when he decided that he’d had enough of Trump University.
By Brad Reed
Check out the full video below.
The "university" took Felicisimo Limon's money and gave him almost nothing in return.
We’re going to be hearing a lot more about Trump University in the coming days, especially after a judge whom Trump had bashed for being a “Mexican” recently ordered the release [3] of several internal Trump U. documents that will be out by the end of the week. CNN spent some time talking with some former Trump University students who described how the “university” took $26,000 of his money and gave him almost nothing in return.
Felicisimo Limon, a retired Navy veteran of 40 years, took a free introductory seminar that convinced him to invest in taking real estate courses at the “school.” However, after five days of “instruction,” he says that he didn’t learn any useful information and was constantly pressured by instructors to pay even more money than what he’d already forked over.
“What the heck are you talking about, more money and I’m not learning anything?” Limon asked rhetorically, before explaining that the courses taught no special real estate secrets or techniques. In fact, CNN says that the only thing somewhat useful he learned about was the benefit of “paying off the unpaid tax benefits of elderly people, keeping them in their homes until they die, but then taking ownership of the property.” Limon said he found this idea to be immoral, which was when he decided that he’d had enough of Trump University.
By Brad Reed
Check out the full video below.