The Stimulus Worked

SmarterThanYou said:
glad you're dumbass liked it, however, if you want to be exactly specific because of the word 'stimulus', we spent 787 billion and lost 600 billion. maybe it's just me, but i'm not seeing that as 'working'.
Click to expand...

The UK gave up and fell behind by 5%, the US half-assed it and barely maintained its position, China did it right, and they're economy grew at 8% last year. People have already moved the date when China will exceed the US up from 2020 to 2017 due to the recent crisis. How far will we have to move it up if the Republicans win in 2012 and our economy starts shrinking at 5% or so a year? 2015? 2014?
 
cawacko said:
It worked, except for the unemployed people.
Click to expand...

shhh... you are not supposed to mention that. The only things that matter to people are GDP whether the stimulus created a job. People don't care if they are working or not. People don't care about whether the stimulus even kept pace with population growth. They just want to make sure total GDP is back where it was in early 2008.
 
Yurt said:
sorry, but you have no clue what correlation means. i'll help you out though:

http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/correlation

show the proof, but first read the definition. thanks.
Click to expand...


The proof of correlation is right there in the chart. Increased growth is correlated with the stimulus whereas slow growth is correlated with no stimulus. It's right there. You just have to look at it and have basic knowledge of the time lines.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Oh you missed a good one. When he was debating Cypress on climate change Cypress would reference peer reviewed papers and data and Freak would reference the Petroleum Institute of America and some mining engineer from Montana, it was to fucking die for, it was so funny. Almost as good as Dixie on evolution :)
Click to expand...

You are entirely full of shit. I posted PEER reviewed papers from climatologists only to here your hero Cypress claim that the University was 'one no one ever heard of' or some such nonsense.

Cypress referenced op-ed pieces that would mention (but never link to) 'peer reviewed' pieces. But as well all know today... you idiots claiming 'consensus' were wrong to do so. You idiots claiming the debate was over were wrong. Take a look at my signature for one of that idiots responses.

Listening to you flat earth global warming fear mongers is what was funny. Especially after the latest report from CERN (which you fear mongering idiots refuse to acknowledge).

Everything I stated then is still true today. Can you say the same? Didn't think so.... you fucking moron.
 
Darla said:
LMAO I think I actualy was here for that now that you said this. It rings a bell.
Click to expand...

That bell ringing is the sound of the fire alarm from their idiotic straw man burning....

They simply claimed everything that went against their fear mongering religion was funded by the Petroleum institute.
 
Watermark Tzu said:
The UK gave up and fell behind by 5%, the US half-assed it and barely maintained its position, China did it right, and they're economy grew at 8% last year. People have already moved the date when China will exceed the US up from 2020 to 2017 due to the recent crisis. How far will we have to move it up if the Republicans win in 2012 and our economy starts shrinking at 5% or so a year? 2015? 2014?
Click to expand...

They lost the entire Congress in 2006 and the Presidency in 2008 and look whats happened since.....its time you faced the facts
 
Superfreak said:
That bell ringing is the sound of the fire alarm from their idiotic straw man burning....

They simply claimed everything that went against their fear mongering religion was funded by the Petroleum institute.
Click to expand...


The point is...now we all knew it was bullshit and bogus and we were proven right.....and they're still whining....
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top