The roe v wade leak . Is it meant to distract us from 2000 MULES??

[AProudLefty]

You do realize movie directors can't indict people right. That would require a police investigation first. Gee Liberals are dumb.

Wow you really are dumb.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

So it's a nothingburger like I suspected.

Hard to say without seeing it.

 

[AProudLefty]

Hard to say without seeing it.

So they withdrew evidence. That's a chargeable offense.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

You realize that withholding evidence is a crime, right?

WTF are you babbling about???. Are you saying dinesh is withholding evidence??? He's presenting it to the world, you fool.

 

[AProudLefty]

WTF are you babbling about???. Are you saying dinesh is withholding evidence??? He's presenting it to the world, you fool.

It is his duty to present evidence to the authorities. He did not do that.

 

[Walt]

This is the first Supreme Court decision that has ever been leaked

Actually, 50 years ago Roe v. Wade was technically leaked. Other decisions, and even more extreme the internal debate, have been leaked.

I think it is pretty clear that it was leaked to keep it from being softened. The conservative judges were looking into how far they could go without doing damage to the Republican Party, and suddenly the most extreme draft gets leaked? What I believe happened was anti-abortionists saw their victory being given away, again, and forced the justices hands.

Larry Hammond, a clerk for Justice Powell, gave a Time reporter a copy of the decision "on background," expecting that it would be issued by the court before the next issue of Time was published. However, due to a delay in the decision's release, the text of the decision appeared on newsstands a few hours before it was published by the court. Chief Justice Burger demanded a meeting with Time's editors and punishment for the leaker.[69] Justice Powell refused Hammond's resignation, however, on the grounds "that Hammond had been double-crossed" by the reporter.[82]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade#Supreme_Court_decision

 

[Earl]

Slow Joec was against abortion before he was for it.


Flip-Floppin’ Joe Biden Once Voted to Overturn Roe v. Wade

President Joe Biden opposed the Supreme Court’s decision to legalize abortion one year after Roe v Wade.

“I don’t think that a woman has the sole right to say what should happen to her body,” he told the Washingtonian in 1974, one year after the court legalized abortion.

“I don’t like the Supreme Court decision on abortion. I think it went too far,” he added.

All of it with comments:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...rn-roe-v-wade/

 

[Phantasmal]

Slow Joec was against abortion before he was for it.


Flip-Floppin’ Joe Biden Once Voted to Overturn Roe v. Wade

President Joe Biden opposed the Supreme Court’s decision to legalize abortion one year after Roe v Wade.

“I don’t think that a woman has the sole right to say what should happen to her body,” he told the Washingtonian in 1974, one year after the court legalized abortion.

“I don’t like the Supreme Court decision on abortion. I think it went too far,” he added.

All of it with comments:
https://www.breitbart.com/politics/2...rn-roe-v-wade/

It doesn’t matter 70% of Americans support privacy and freedom of choice.

 

[ExpressLane]

It doesn’t matter 70% of Americans support privacy and freedom of choice.

Good. Now pass an amendment that guarantees abortion on demand you have had 50 years to do that already. Most Americans want limits on abortion. You side pushed too hard and wanted abortion legal until birth. Mississippi wanted limits on abortion and your side caused Roe to be reexamined and to be thrown out. No it goes back to the state and the people where it should have been in the first place.

 

[ExpressLane]

Actually, 50 years ago Roe v. Wade was technically leaked. Other decisions, and even more extreme the internal debate, have been leaked.

I think it is pretty clear that it was leaked to keep it from being softened. The conservative judges were looking into how far they could go without doing damage to the Republican Party, and suddenly the most extreme draft gets leaked? What I believe happened was anti-abortionists saw their victory being given away, again, and forced the justices hands.


https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Roe_v._Wade#Supreme_Court_decision

Yeah conservative judges leaked it because they wanted death threats even earlier. Walt you are daft in the head.

 

[Poor Richard Saunders]

No, it's not. The evidence presented is likely insufficient for criminal charges to be brought without further investigation.

It sounds like the evidence presented is only evidence of D'Souza trying to grift money from Trumpers. It certainly isn't evidence of any election fraud.

 

[Damocles]

I hadn't thought of this angle but yeah, they need something to stop discussion of this new documentary on the stolen election. That's also why pelosi sent in her goons on Jan 6 to turn a protest into a riot and give her an excuse to cancel the congresssional hearings into the election scheduled for later that day.

Nah, this is meant to drive women to the polls. They will also say really insane things like "LBGTQ+ folks will be affected the most!" to try to get them out to vote too. Basically, they needed something to get people to vote for them because their pResident is a basement dwelling dementia patient that they can only trot out with speed every so often and the more they do it the more they drop in the polls. So they think that leaking a SCOTUS decision that would have gotten out before the election anyway is the way to go.

You shouldn't let this stop you from talking about 9% inflation in your state, or the fact that the economy shrank last quarter due to stupid Brandon economic policy. Don't lose your focus man.

 

[Earl]

Allow the voters in each state who elect their representatives to decide about abortion.

This is democracy in action.

Roe vs. Wade is not a law, it is a decision by the Supreme Court which is now being corrected.

The far left Democrat Socialists can scream and bang their heads on the floor but they will still be able to murder their own children in hell holes like California, New York etc.

 

[martin]

I hadn't thought of this angle but yeah, they need something to stop discussion of this new documentary on the stolen election. That's also why pelosi sent in her goons on Jan 6 to turn a protest into a riot and give her an excuse to cancel the congresssional hearings into the election scheduled for later that day.

Why should Democrats want to distract you from a farce of your own making?

 

[Walt]

No, it's not. The evidence presented is likely insufficient for criminal charges to be brought without further investigation.

There has been a year and a half of investigation. There has been no evidence uncovered. Absolutely nothing found in a year and a half.

 

[T. A. Gardner]

There has been a year and a half of investigation. There has been no evidence uncovered. Absolutely nothing found in a year and a half.

That depends on what and how things were investigated.

 

[martin]

That depends on what and how things were investigated.

Yeah, half ass did the “how” for The Stolen Election. No better example of it than “2,000 mules”.

 

[ZenMode]

I hadn't thought of this angle but yeah, they need something to stop discussion of this new documentary on the stolen election. That's also why pelosi sent in her goons on Jan 6 to turn a protest into a riot and give her an excuse to cancel the congresssional hearings into the election scheduled for later that day.

98% of the people who watch that movie are probably those who already believe in the Big Lie.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

It is his duty to present evidence to the authorities. He did not do that.

WTF are you talking about? If i see someone speeding am i REQUIRED to call the cops on them? THINK, you stupid tranny.

 

[Text Drivers are Killers]

It doesn’t matter 70% of Americans support privacy and freedom of choice.

So now abortion is about PRIVACY??? HAHAHAHA