The roe v wade leak . Is it meant to distract us from 2000 MULES??

T

Text Drivers are Killers

Joe Biden - "Time to put Trump in the bullseye."
I hadn't thought of this angle but yeah, they need something to stop discussion of this new documentary on the stolen election. That's also why pelosi sent in her goons on Jan 6 to turn a protest into a riot and give her an excuse to cancel the congresssional hearings into the election scheduled for later that day.

https://www.westernjournal.com/wayn...accident-distraction-look-else-just-happened/

may 3 2022 Wayne Allyn Root: The Roe Leak Isn't an Accident, It's a Distraction

Do you believe the 2020 election was stolen? Do you need more evidence? Then watch the “2,000 Mules” movie coming out this week.

How powerful is “2,000 Mules”? Why do you think the Supreme Court decision on Roe v. Wade was leaked right at this exact moment? This is the first Supreme Court decision that has ever been leaked — and it just happened to occur on the eve of the release of “2,000 Mules”?

They call us crazy. They call us conspiracy theorists. They refuse any investigation. They fight against forensic audits with armies of lawyers. They ban any discussion. They refuse any debate. Is this normal?

They kick us off Twitter, Facebook, YouTube or Instagram for even a mention of a stolen election. What are they so afraid of?

There’s no evidence, they say. There’s actually plenty of evidence, but that’s why the media, Big Tech and Democrats have banned any discussion or debate. The establishment media and social media have conspired to make it disappear — just like Hunter Biden’s laptop.

Donald Trump was running away with a landslide electoral victory at midnight on election night when suddenly five key states announced at the same time, for the first time in history, that they were stopping the vote count until morning.

Trump had insurmountable leads in all five states. Yet when we woke up, the leads were gone. Hundreds of thousands of new votes — almost 100 percent for Biden — were found overnight. And they were found with no GOP witnesses in the counting rooms. No problem there, right?
Click to expand...
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
I hadn't thought of this angle but yeah, they need something to stop discussion of this new documentary on the stolen election. That's also why pelosi sent in her goons on Jan 6 to turn a protest into a riot and give her an excuse to cancel the congresssional hearings into the election scheduled for later that day.
Click to expand...

Nope.
 
This IS a revolution.

If you dont understand this yet then I request that you get better....fast!
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
I hadn't thought of this angle but yeah, they need something to stop discussion of this new documentary on the stolen election. That's also why pelosi sent in her goons on Jan 6 to turn a protest into a riot and give her an excuse to cancel the congresssional hearings into the election scheduled for later that day.
Click to expand...

Definitely not. The documentary is getting little attention and proves nothing. The leaked draft has no effect on the public's opinion about the election since they all agree (including many Republican officials) that the election was not fraudulent and Biden won.

Congress completed its business when it convened after the riot failed.
 
Hawkeye10 said:
A radical insider decided to try to push the court in their direction, and to weaken the court.
Click to expand...

I think it was an attempt to influence the court. If it had been an attempt to influence the November election it would have been better to wait until the court issued its opinion in late June or early July.
 
Text Drivers are Killers said:
I hadn't thought of this angle but yeah, they need something to stop discussion of this new documentary on the stolen election. That's also why pelosi sent in her goons on Jan 6 to turn a protest into a riot and give her an excuse to cancel the congresssional hearings into the election scheduled for later that day.
Click to expand...

The purpose was nowhere near this petty.
 
Flash said:
I think it was an attempt to influence the court. If it had been an attempt to influence the November election it would have been better to wait until the court issued its opinion in late June or early July.
Click to expand...

I would have rather seen "Hawkeye, you are of course correct!".
 
AProudLefty said:
Nope.
Click to expand...

I agree. This is simply the Left being the Left. It's likely a spur of the moment decision by a Leftist clerk to do this without thinking through the consequences. Get it out, and stir up shit. Beyond that, not a single thought about what would happen.

2000 Mules is likely to sail largely under the radar in any case. Advertising isn't heavy for it. Movie theaters will run it but as any documentary does it's likely to draw a small and select audience. It won't last long in theaters and online, it'll remain a niche movie regardless of its accuracy or inaccuracy.
 
T. A. Gardner said:
I agree. This is simply the Left being the Left. It's likely a spur of the moment decision by a Leftist clerk to do this without thinking through the consequences. Get it out, and stir up shit. Beyond that, not a single thought about what would happen.

2000 Mules is likely to sail largely under the radar in any case. Advertising isn't heavy for it. Movie theaters will run it but as any documentary does it's likely to draw a small and select audience. It won't last long in theaters and online, it'll remain a niche movie regardless of its accuracy or inaccuracy.
Click to expand...

You realize that withholding evidence is a crime, right?
 
AProudLefty said:
Are you saying that the movie is insufficient for criminal charges?
Click to expand...

Yes. It's a movie, not a proper criminal investigation. It might form the basis for one, and the authorities could demand the producers turn over evidence, but on its own it's just a movie.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top