The right cancels Kimmel

TOP said:
What is confusing you...was this on Public TV? I don't follow Don Jr. on Twitter... Do you?
Click to expand...
You keep injecting YOUR personal experience as though it's relevant here. It's not. You need to look at the actual picture:

Don Jr. has literally millions of followers on both Twitter and "truth" social. And yes - I follow him. He was a former president's son at the time he posted that garbage. You don't think Jr.'s position as the president's son, with millions of followers makes him responsible for acting decently? And seriously, you don't think what Jr. did was worst than what Kimmel said about Kirk?

I'm testing your judgement here. Will I be disappointed?
 
LurchAddams said:
You keep injecting YOUR personal experience as though it's relevant here. It's not. You need to look at the actual picture:

Don Jr. has literally millions of followers on both Twitter and "truth" social. And yes - I follow him. He was a former president's son at the time he posted that garbage. You don't think Jr.'s position as the president's son, with millions of followers makes him responsible for acting decently? And seriously, you don't think what Jr. did was worst than what Kimmel said about Kirk?

I'm testing your judgement here. Will I be disappointed?
Click to expand...
This is the actual picture....
Jimmy was on Public TV...he works for someone...He is accountable to them...
Don Jr. was on his twitter page...
Did he get negative responses to the post? Can you report Twitter posts? If you thought it insensitive, did you report it? Did you unfollow him?
Two entirely different situations...
( PS: I'm not allowed to inject my personal experience, but you just expressed yours...how does that work?:))
 
LurchAddams said:
You keep injecting YOUR personal experience as though it's relevant here. It's not. You need to look at the actual picture:

Don Jr. has literally millions of followers on both Twitter and "truth" social. And yes - I follow him. He was a former president's son at the time he posted that garbage. You don't think Jr.'s position as the president's son, with millions of followers makes him responsible for acting decently? And seriously, you don't think what Jr. did was worst than what Kimmel said about Kirk?

I'm testing your judgement here. Will I be disappointed?
Click to expand...
The entirety of her life is fox, facebook and jpp, no independent thought process, good luck trying to have any intelligent conversation
 
TOP said:
This is the actual picture....
Jimmy was on Public TV...he works for someone...He is accountable to them...
Don Jr. was on his twitter page...
Did he get negative responses to the post? Can you report Twitter posts? If you thought it insensitive, did you report it? Did you unfollow him?
Two entirely different situations...
( PS: I'm not allowed to inject my personal experience, but you just expressed yours...how does that work?:))
Click to expand...
Well, you gave me the answer. In your opinion, a president's son should face no consequences for acting dishonorably, but a comedian should.

Your logic is flawed, but I understand, to support bad behavior, it needs to be.

Have a nice day!
 
LurchAddams said:
Well, you gave me the answer. In your opinion, a president's son should face no consequences for acting dishonorably, but a comedian should.

Your logic is flawed, but I understand, to support bad behavior, it needs to be.

Have a nice day!
Click to expand...
you skipped the most important issue. public airwaves have limitations. a monopoly was granted. The FCC can exert power of this monopoly. We used to have a fairness doctrine which would of completely fucked up this propaganda you have enjoyed
 
zymurgy said:
you skipped the most important issue. public airwaves have limitations. a monopoly was granted. The FCC can exert power of this monopoly. We used to have a fairness doctrine which would of completely fucked up this propaganda you have enjoyed
Click to expand...
Hey, great to see you! Posting another pic of my next girlfriend after she becomes our former first lady.

Here she is entertaining another lovely young lady. My objective is to make her scream, "you're my daddy" as I'm anally penetrating her. I think it's an honorable goal, don't you?

NSFW:
1758299068003.png
 
Last edited by a moderator:
LurchAddams said:
Hey, great to see you! Posting another pic of my next girlfriend after she becomes our former first lady.

Here she is entertaining another lovely young lady. My objective is to make her scream, "you're my daddy" as I'm anally penetrating her. I think it's an honorable goal, don't you?

View attachment 60016
Click to expand...
12(a) - No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.

Grow up Lurch.
 
FastLane said:
12(a) - No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.

Grow up Lurch.
Click to expand...
Oh desr...That was indeed a violation of that rule....
 
Dutch Uncle said:
The Orange Jesus is solidifying his dictatorship to the wild applause of all MAGAts. Is it really any wonder that if the civil war comes, all of these fuckers need to be treated like ISIS terrorists seeking to destroy our Republic? No cruelty. Just a fair trial and a fair hanging.

a6hyta.jpg
Click to expand...
I guess now these backyard hillbillies got another Amend. to abuse....the first and the second. We should all feel a little safer, these moron's don't know anything past those two...thank God.
 
FastLane said:
12(a) - No Porn. This is not a porn site. It will be deleted. If it is constant you will likely lose access to the board. The board is for debate not sexual content. This includes nude photos and links to such as well as graphic stories of sexual encounters. This is a politics site, not a site for sexual gratification.

Grow up Lurch.
Click to expand...
Do numerous repeats by a poster saying "Suck my d*ck" constitute porn also?
 
I love this thread, but actually it is "America cancels Kimmel"

all you shit stains that don't understand it - go act like Jimmy using your real identify. we beg of thee

being called out for gross behavior transcends political parties - and is why this is happening so swiftly. You have lived in a bubble where you thought being a shit stain was ok
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top