the proof Bush team Knew Iraq had no weapons in 2002

BRADLEY: According to Drumheller, CIA Director George Tenet delivered the news about the Iraqi foreign minister at a high level meeting at the White House.

DRUMHELLER: The President, the Vice President, Dr. Rice…

BRADLEY: And at that meeting…?

DRUMHELLER: They were enthusiastic because they said they were excited that we had a high-level penetration of Iraqis.

BRADLEY: And what did this high level source tell you?

DRUMHELLER: He told us that they had no active weapons of mass destruction program.

BRADLEY: So, in the fall of 2002, before going to war, we had it on good authority from a source within Saddam’s inner circle that he didn’t have an active program for weapons of mass destruction?

DRUMHELLER: Yes.

BRADLEY: There’s no doubt in your mind about that?

DRUMHELLER: No doubt in my mind at all.

BRADLEY: It directly contradicts, though, what the President and his staff were telling us.

DRUMHELLER: The policy was set. The war in Iraq was coming, and they were looking for intelligence to fit into the policy, to justify the policy.
 
I dont understand why the Rebutlikins are not upset about having been lied to?
 
Heck we liberals even got disgusted that clowntoon lied over his Monica affair. And no one died over that one.
 
i don't recall libs getting pissed about clowntoon lying. they were only pissed about him be called on the carpet for it.
 
uscitizen said:
This lib was pissed hip.
Clowntoons intelligence level dropped with a big thump to me over that lie.
Click to expand...
I lost a ton of respect for the establishment entire. Had I played that same game I'd have lost my clearance and been sent "Haze Grey and Underway" chipping and painting for the remainder of my time. And that would be the least of what I would have had to endure.
 
HipLew said:
i don't recall libs getting pissed about clowntoon lying. they were only pissed about him be called on the carpet for it.
Click to expand...


Honestly, I didn't give a shit about Clinton lying about a BJ. His sex life is of no interest to me. Hillary has a right to know, but not me....I'm not married to the guy.
 
Cypress said:
Honestly, I didn't give a shit about Clinton lying about a BJ. His sex life is of no interest to me. Hillary has a right to know, but not me....I'm not married to the guy.
Click to expand...


Honestly, I didn't give a shit about Clinton lying about a BJ either! I think most men would have lied about getting a BJ from their intern who was half their age, particularly the married kind. His sex life was not an interest to me, and I wish I hadn't been put in the uncomfortable position of having to explain the details of his sex life to my young daughters. I felt sorry for Hillary at first, but when she decided to 'stand by her man' I lost any sympathy.

What bothered me, above and beyond everything else, was the lies he told to the grand jury, in a sexual harassment case. Paula Jones should have had the rights of every American, to pursue legal remedy for an injustice to her, and was denied this right because of Clinton's lies. It also bothered me that he wasn't removed after impeachment, as that is generally the purpose behind impeachment. In essence, Clinton got away with a big one. The kind of thing that destroys most political careers.
 
Honestly, I didn't give a shit about Clinton lying about a BJ either! I think most men would have lied about getting a BJ from their intern who was half their age


Stop your lying. How many times have cons like you berated clinton for wagging his finger at that press conference and denying he had sex? He wasn't "under oath" then - but, I bet you've expressed manufactured outrage for years over that press conference.

And Cons were obsessed with clinton's sex life for years before monica. Do I need to remind you of Gennifer Flowers, and "troopergate"
 
Cypress said:
Honestly, I didn't give a shit about Clinton lying about a BJ either! I think most men would have lied about getting a BJ from their intern who was half their age


Stop your lying. How many times have cons like you berated clinton for wagging his finger at that press conference and denying he had sex? He wasn't "under oath" then - but, I bet you've expressed manufactured outrage for years over that press conference.

And Cons were obsessed with clinton's sex life for years before monica. Do I need to remind you of Gennifer Flowers, and "troopergate"
Click to expand...

I think it's troubling anytime our presidents wags his finger and lies in our face like Clinton did. Don't you? Does that not bother you either? Probably not, as long as he vetos bans on partial birth, it doesn't matter what he does, huh?

As for being obsessed with Clinton's sex life, here's a little tid-bit of information.... ANYTIME a politician is involved in scandalous sex affairs, and they can be uncovered and revealed by the opposition... they WILL be! It doesn't matter what party, it doesn't matter what office, this will result across the board, and it's not an "obsession" it's "politics".

You want to blame the right wing for Gennifer Flowers, but it seems to me, the right wing didn't unzip Clinton's pants and put his penis into Ms. Flowers vagina, that was all Bill Clinton's doing! It would also seem, the best way to have avoided the embarrassing bimbo eruptions, would have been for Bill Clinton to have avoided the bimbos.
 
I think it's troubling anytime our presidents wags his finger and lies in our face like Clinton did. Don't you?

You just said ten minutes ago that you didn't care about BJs. You only cared that he lied under oath. When are you going to settle on one story?


I don't care about the finger wagging. If he was having a consensual affair, he doesn't owe ME the truth about that - he owes his wife the truth.
 
uscitizen said:
Injustice to Monica, heck she was an eager participant. flogging a dead horse ?
Click to expand...


Injustice to Paula Jones.

On the basis of Clintons comletely dishonest testimony, her case was dismissed on lack of evidence. She should have had the rights of ANY American, to have her case fairly adjudicated in a court of law, and that was denied to her by the direct lies of Bill Clinton, under oath, no less!

So, with Clinton... we essentially said... if you are an average American relying on the legal justice system, someone as powerful as a president, has the right to lie under oath to protect his political career, and this trumps your constitutional rights to due process.
 
Dixie said:
Honestly, I didn't give a shit about Clinton lying about a BJ either! I think most men would have lied about getting a BJ from their intern who was half their age, particularly the married kind. His sex life was not an interest to me, and I wish I hadn't been put in the uncomfortable position of having to explain the details of his sex life to my young daughters. I felt sorry for Hillary at first, but when she decided to 'stand by her man' I lost any sympathy.

What bothered me, above and beyond everything else, was the lies he told to the grand jury, in a sexual harassment case. Paula Jones should have had the rights of every American, to pursue legal remedy for an injustice to her, and was denied this right because of Clinton's lies. It also bothered me that he wasn't removed after impeachment, as that is generally the purpose behind impeachment. In essence, Clinton got away with a big one. The kind of thing that destroys most political careers.
Click to expand...


How, by any stretch of the imagination, was Paula Jones denied justice by President Clinton lying about an affair that occured years after the alleged injustice that was claimed to have been done to her?
 
Dixie said:
I think it's troubling anytime our presidents wags his finger and lies in our face like Clinton did. Don't you? Does that not bother you either? Probably not, as long as he vetos bans on partial birth, it doesn't matter what he does, huh?

As for being obsessed with Clinton's sex life, here's a little tid-bit of information.... ANYTIME a politician is involved in scandalous sex affairs, and they can be uncovered and revealed by the opposition... they WILL be! It doesn't matter what party, it doesn't matter what office, this will result across the board, and it's not an "obsession" it's "politics".

You want to blame the right wing for Gennifer Flowers, but it seems to me, the right wing didn't unzip Clinton's pants and put his penis into Ms. Flowers vagina, that was all Bill Clinton's doing! It would also seem, the best way to have avoided the embarrassing bimbo eruptions, would have been for Bill Clinton to have avoided the bimbos.
Click to expand...



You have some evidence President Clinton had sex with Generfer Flowers, or was that just a slanderous slimy lie you just spit out?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top