The President better hope and pray the GOP doesn't lose the House in 2018

archives said:
Amazing, no one said "he has" to, rather, he will, actually, he already told America his tax reform is going be "tremendous," now why do you suppose he did that if he has no role in it?
Click to expand...

silly lib'rul.......if what we get sucks it just means we didn't get Trump's tax reform.......
 
archives said:
Conservatives aren't very good at that either, usually just comes off as poor humor, it just ain't in them, too mad at everything all the time
Click to expand...

Irony.

Please explain how Congress has the power to force a sitting president to make their past tax returns public.

I'll wait. :rofl2:
 
God bless America said:
Not surprising that Archives can't tell when he's being mocked, is it?

He just admitted that he thought a person had to have their own radio show to be a real American.

BTW, Archives - I am mocking you. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

Hey, every time in the car when I'm channel surfing the AM channels I hear all these radio demogogues and callers referring to each other as "patriots," thought it was a prerequisite
 
floriduhfan said:
Real Americans voted against Trump, which is why he lost by 3 million votes.
Click to expand...

3 million Americans have a radio show of their own?

Having your own radio show is what Archives thinks makes someone a real American.

Of course, I think differently.

I think being a citizen makes you a real American. :rofl2:
 
Pappy Jones said:
ASPCA refuses to discuss feline health because their President refuses to put up his cat for public inspection!

That logic has broken this poor little kitty's brain, I hope they are proud of themselves.

hC4B8D9FE
Click to expand...

I imagine that's what Christiefa Antifa looked like earlier today. :rofl2:
 
God bless America said:
Irony.

Please explain how Congress has the power to force a sitting president to make their past tax returns public.

I'll wait. :rofl2:
Click to expand...

No problem

" A law enacted in 1924 after the Teapot Dome scandal allows the Way and Means Committee, along with the Senate Committee on Finance and the Joint Committee on Taxation, to request tax information for review in a closed session with possible public disclosure."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...-card-b:homepage/story&utm_term=.c3992f39ae7e

Which the Committee on Taxation used against President Nixon in 1974
 
archives said:
No problem

" A law enacted in 1924 after the Teapot Dome scandal allows the Way and Means Committee, along with the Senate Committee on Finance and the Joint Committee on Taxation, to request tax information for review in a closed session with possible public disclosure."

https://www.washingtonpost.com/opin...-card-b:homepage/story&utm_term=.c3992f39ae7e

Which the Committee on Taxation used against President Nixon in 1974
Click to expand...


Was said authorization retroactive, Archives?

Has this alleged law ever survived a Constitutional challenge, Archives?

BTW, Archives, tell me what you're willing to bet that the DEMOCRATS will "take the House in 2018".
 
Hilarious. The DEMOCRAT-friendly WaPo cites an opinion by George K. Yin (a professor of law and taxation at the University of Virginia and a former chief of staff of the congressional Joint Committee on Taxation) which is clearly marked "very preliminary draft – not for attribution" and dated Jan. 27, 2015.

:rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2: :rofl2:

Good luck with that one, Archives. :D
 
Votes are votes regardless of where they come from. Voters did not want Trump and after 8 months of failure, can you blame them.
 
archives said:
"Non sequitur," that's pretty funny, only topped by "galactically," in other words, your stuck, I get it

No, you didn't say President's were millionaires, rather that they weren't rich making four hundred thousand a year, like that is all their going to make every year of their life

If it happens to benefit him, no, but if he pushes for a particular tax change because it specifically benefits him personally, yes, that is a conflict of interest
Click to expand...

:palm:

I know I didn't say that, liar. And I never said they were not rich making 400K a year, liar.

And no, it is not a conflict of interest, liar.
 
Last edited:
Yaya said:
:palm:

I know I didn't say that, liar. And I never said they were not rich making 400K a year, liar.

And no, it is not a conflict of interest, liar.
Click to expand...

Yaya, did you notice we have another self-proclaimed paragon of higher education who doesn't know the difference between "your" and "you're"?

archives said:
"Non sequitur," that's pretty funny, only topped by "galactically," in other words, your stuck, I get it
Click to expand...

:rofl2:
 
God bless America said:
Was said authorization retroactive, Archives?

Has this alleged law ever survived a Constitutional challenge, Archives?

BTW, Archives, tell me what you're willing to bet that the DEMOCRATS will "take the House in 2018".
Click to expand...

For the second time for those seemingly having difficulties processing information, Nixon was forced to release his tax data to the House Committee on Taxation back in 1974

And again for those having problems, I never said the Democrats would win the House in 2018, even stated statistically it would be an uphill battle at his point, and now you want me to bet? Weird
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top