The Nation Is Divided Into Two Camps: Trump and Anti-Trump

Queen Snowflake said:
Conservatives always support smaller government, what exactly does this broad phrase mean to you?

Less government services?
Less regulations on business?
Less restrictions on your person?
Less military involvement?
Fewer highways?
Less grants for student, scientists, arts?
Less support for children, the elderly, the handicapped?

What exactly do you want to cut?
Click to expand...

Taxes. It's part of the Trump Agenda.
 
Queen Snowflake said:
Conservatives always support smaller government, what exactly does this broad phrase mean to you?

Less government services?
Less regulations on business?
Less restrictions on your person?
Less military involvement?
Fewer highways?
Less grants for student, scientists, arts?
Less support for children, the elderly, the handicapped?

What exactly do you want to cut?
Click to expand...

For me it's more about less federal mandates and federal regulation within the states and also a more literal following of the US constitution. All states have their own constitutions and the states know best how it functions and how it should function but when a group of people thousands of miles away can override those things I think it hurts more than it helps. States elect everybody on all levels of government to represent them and they are all typically from that state, so they have skin in the game so to speak and since it's their home they want what's best for it. When people who aren't from that state can have influence over how it functions I personally think that's a bad thing.
 
Norah said:
For me it's more about less federal mandates and federal regulation within the states and also a more literal following of the US constitution. All states have their own constitutions and the states know best how it functions and how it should function but when a group of people thousands of miles away can override those things I think it hurts more than it helps. States elect everybody on all levels of government to represent them and they are all typically from that state, so they have skin in the game so to speak and since it's their home they want what's best for it. When people who aren't from that state can have influence over how it functions I personally think that's a bad thing.
Click to expand...
That's very general answer.
 
evince said:
demonstrate a logical argument that proves our government is too big in any area and how being smaller the people are empowered


YOU CAN NOT


you dont even know a reasonable debate on the subject because its an idiot meme
Click to expand...

sure. Government wants to impose minimum wages suitable for new york and los angeles into states with weaker economies instead of letting them resolve it on a state level.
 
dear fucking idiot


there has been a national minimum wage for how many decades


fuck you very much failboy
 
Queen Snowflake said:
That's very general answer.
Click to expand...

I know but I'm just not sure where to start when it comes to details. I think many of the departments in DC could be closed down so that states can decide on their own. Departments like education, EPA, federal reserve, HUD, energy, and many others could be eliminated or cut in half and it wouldn't affect the country due to states already having many of those functions in place.
 
evince said:
dear fucking idiot


there has been a national minimum wage for how many decades


fuck you very much failboy
Click to expand...

and you want to raise it to 15 or 12 because that is what is necessary in the bigger cities. Instead of letting the states handle it.
 
Let's see Desh. What is the gov't didn't focus on the war on drugs and locked less people up. Would that be a good thing?

What about the military? Does it need to spend all the money it currently does?
 
blackascoal said:
America's Parallel Universes
After the election of Donald Trump to the presidency, the nation is even more fiercely divided.

The bottom line is that, far from generating unity or a spirit of conciliation, which many Americans hoped for, the presidential election Nov. 8 has more deeply divided America into two parallel universes, Trumpworld and anti-Trumpworld.

---

The fact is that Trump is reaping what he sowed. He was one of the most divisive and negative presidential candidates in modern history, unwilling to give his adversaries much respect. Now his opponents are doing the same to him, emerging as implacable foes at a time when President-elect Trump could use all the understanding and support he can muster.
http://www.usnews.com/news/the-repo...s-divided-into-two-camps-trump-and-anti-trump

If you think Obama faced resistance .. you ain't seen nothing yet. It will be unprecedented.
Click to expand...
Meh....I'm pretty skeptical there. For 6 years we've had an entire political party oppose and obstruct anything the current President has attempted simply just to oppose him. There has been no logic, no justifiable reasoning, no sane thinking or placing the nations interests first and the center right of the GOP is bullshitting everyone when they say it wasn't based on racism. The opposition may not have been completely based on racist attitudes but it has largely been based on them.
 
blackascoal said:
NOTHING compares to this .. and that's a wonderful thing.
Click to expand...

Nope, yer correct: the absolute smashing cumulative losses the dim wit Democrat party, (the party of slavery, kkk, jim crow, treason, felony, sovereign bankruptcy and division), has suffered in 2010, 2014 and 2016 has not been seen since the 1860s.

As an angry divisive upside down Marxist poster, it is not a surprise you would find such a crushing defeat "a wonderful thing".

The Liberal/Progressive/Marxist/Statist/Fascist dim wit Democrats are a bunch of immature whinny sore losers, and hopefully will be out of power for generations.
 
Norah said:
I know but I'm just not sure where to start when it comes to details. I think many of the departments in DC could be closed down so that states can decide on their own. Departments like education, EPA, federal reserve, HUD, energy, and many others could be eliminated or cut in half and it wouldn't affect the country due to states already having many of those functions in place.
Click to expand...
Unfortunately Norah, the reason the government gets into these areas is to protect minorities in most cases and the general population in the case of the EPA. It would be wonderful if states did the right things, but unfortunately, they don't. It is like trusting business to do the right things, unfortunatrly, greed or ideologies will cause people to make decisions which endanger workers or restrict minorities rights.

The South would still have segregated schools if states had complete control. Evolution would not be taught in schools, and gays would not have rights, coal miners and other dangerous occupations would not be regulated and pollution of air and water would be allowed by industry.
 
Mott the Hoople said:
Meh....I'm pretty skeptical there. For 6 years we've had an entire political party oppose and obstruct anything the current President has attempted simply just to oppose him. There has been no logic, no justifiable reasoning, no sane thinking or placing the nations interests first and the center right of the GOP is bullshitting everyone when they say it wasn't based on racism. The opposition may not have been completely based on racist attitudes but it has largely been based on them.
Click to expand...

Dude racism is so IN. The entire msm, the DNC, and pundits at large are blaming Trump's glorious victory on racism. Angry white people. You white?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top