The Nation Is Divided Into Two Camps: Trump and Anti-Trump

Mr. Meeseeks said:
norah don't let mott pull this "oh I am an adult, I've lived longer and have more worldly experience than you, and I am going to teach you the ways of the world and once you are properly politically educated you will agree with me card"

Mott is often quite retarded, plenty of us know this on JPP. He's from the failure state of ohio. Don't let him pull the wool over your eyes. He's probing you for weakness to see if you are willing to kick him in the proverbial cajones. I suggest you do so. Without mercy.

:derpmott:
Click to expand...
Mott is a good guy but when it comes to matters like the EPA he is blinkered. He works in waste disposal and is hardly likely to rubbish (intentional pun) regulations that keep him in a job. It is the old turkeys voting for Xmas analogy.

Sent from my Lenovo K52e78 using Tapatalk
 
Mr. Meeseeks said:
@OP:

Talk is cheap. I have heard this cheap talk from you for a year now. "There is no way trump can win", "trump doesn't represent america", "impossible for him to be elected," - and lo and behold he's president now.

Perhaps you should stop being a hypcorite. You are a socialist that is butthurt that a corporatist neocon war monger wasn't elected president.

In any case, lets see you start a thread when you actually have a real result. Lets see you block a supreme court nominee for example. Lets see you manifest actual resistance beyond the occasional hippie march no one gives a shit about.

Cause right now all I see is delusional words, scared words, words of projection. You betray your inner pain and suffering. It's written on your face.

Talk is cheap. Lets see results. Until then, I think I am going to call you CheapTalk, because that is what you are.
Click to expand...

HILARIOUS :rofl2:

A. You haven't heard shit from me for a year because I haven't been back posting here for a year.

B. Most of planet earth thought Trump had no chance to win .. but he did. So sue me for being as wrong as most AMERICANS .. as if being wrong about an election such as this is a crime.

C. No doubt you suffered the same wrong every time Obama ran.

D. Anxious for the backlash .. you won't be waiting long.

E. Kiss my ass .. you knuckleheads have been pissing and moaning about Obama for 8 fucking years .. now there is something wrong about opposition? Kiss my ass.

F. The fun is just getting started.
 
Last edited:
anatta said:
I've ignored it until he went off yesterday on me -denigrating my work and views on the Libyan civil war thread that was lost at DCJ.
Today he called me a high school dropout. Do I read like a high school drop out? I've tried to ignore his slights of implied/overt racism etc.

It's sad really. He's lost much rationality & good temperament because of hate.
Click to expand...

Your work? :0)

You're talking about that meaningless bullshit that nobody paid any attention to but you on DCJ? Pages and pages of meaningless bullshit? That 'work?'

There is nothing sad about my recognizing you for the right-wing fraud that you are. Nothing was lost. We have nothing in common.

Carry on asshole.
 
blackascoal said:
Your work? :0)

You're talking about that meaningless bullshit that nobody paid any attention to but you on DCJ? Pages and pages of meaningless bullshit? That 'work?'
Click to expand...

Cosmo does in fact do very good work, (research n' C&P). I many times read his work, (as I know many others do as well), and find it well thought out, informative and interesting. The fact that an angry arrogant Marxist doesn't like what Cosmo posts is neither here nor there, (it means absolutely nothing) to anyone butt: you, (the extra arrogant one).

blackascoal said:
There is nothing sad about my recognizing you for the right-wing fraud that you are. Nothing was lost. We have nothing in common.

Carry on asshole.
Click to expand...

You are to the far Left of Chairman Mao, and or Uncle Joe Stalin, so a moderate Leftie like Cosmo would seem right-wing to a hard core angry Marxist like you: Black Coal feller.

I remember when you used to call Cosmo 'good brother' as he always interacts with other posters, (even angry arrogant ones), with insight and clarity.

You have always been very angry n' full of yersef, now that TARD has seriously affected yer feeble Marxist brain, yer off the richter scale nasty.
 
OldMercsRule said:
Cosmo does in fact do very good work, (research n' C&P). I many times read his work, (as I know many others do as well), and find it well thought out, informative and interesting. The fact that an angry arrogant Marxist doesn't like what Cosmo posts is neither here nor there, (it means absolutely nothing) to anyone butt: you, (the extra arrogant one).



You are to the far Left of Chairman Mao, and or Uncle Joe Stalin, so a moderate Leftie like Cosmo would seem right-wing to a hard core angry Marxist like you: Black Coal feller.

I remember when you used to call Cosmo 'good brother' as he always interacts with other posters, (even angry arrogant ones), with insight and clarity.

You have always been very angry n' full of yersef, now that TARD has seriously affected yer feeble Marxist brain, yer off the richter scale nasty.
Click to expand...

Angry? :0) I post here for the fun and giggles. Nothing said here means a goddamn thing. Not by me, you, or anybody else who posts here.

These are just conversations old man .. meaningless political banter. Maybe you didn't know that.

Like now, I'm talking to some old dude who writes in blue and talks like a retard while I work. Good way to pass the time between work interactions. The occasional good conversations outweigh the idiocy .. most times .. but 'angry' at what? That a bunch of right-wing, mostly racist republicans don't like what I have to say? You'd have to be brain dead to believe that. I have NO expectations that racist white people would like anything about me.

I not only self-identify as a black man, but also as a socialist .. which should tell you that I don't give a fuck about what racist and/or ignorant republicans think about me or my political views. The only expectation I have of the political views of people like you is that I won't agree with them .. and they will call me 'angry' along with a bunch of other racist childish stupid ass labels. I don't care what you think.

Do I have a sense of self-importance? I sure as hell do. :0) Don't you?

As for Cosmos .. yep, used to call him brother .. even a friend. Hell, I call just about everybody 'brother' .. including you at times. But I see him more clearly now .. not my brother, not my friend. I've seen him on another right-wing site where he didn't want me to even mention that we knew each other. I soon recognized that his 'work' was all about partisanship, not about truth .. which is what I was speaking to even though I often vote for democrats.

You choose your own friends old man .. I'll do the same.

As for the rest of your garbled blue bullshit that I'm not going to spend much time trying to decipher .. that's your opinion that you are entitled to .. doesn't mean shit to me.

Angry?

This is fun.
 
Last edited:
^ the only other time I posted with you on another site was Debate Politics where you were making an ass of yourself
about the "Rothschild banks" being the cause of Libyan war 2011.

It might have effected sarcozy - it had nothing to do with the rest of NATO -the R2P is what did it.
Neocon Hillary bought in to democracy with her meeting in Paris with the NTC's Jalil. It's why she advocated war.
Spreading democracy at the barrel of a gun

Whatever I said to you was to save you from clinging to that small concept. I've never disowned you as a friend.
I've told you over and over our politics don't mesh -but I respect your ideas, This is your jihad not mine.

I even respected your reasoning on Trump although it think it's deplorable -you denigrated all the good work we did together.
and you tossed it away over politics. This is all on you -don't make it about me.
 
anatta said:
^ the only other time I posted with you on another sire was Debate Politics where you were making an ass of yourself about the "Rothschild banks" being the cause of Libyan war 2011.
They weren't it might have effected sarcozy - it had nothing to do wuith the rest of NATO -the R2Pis what did it.

Whatever I said to you was to save you from clinging to that small concept. I've never disowned you as a friend.
I've told you over and over our politics don't mesh -but I respect your ideas, This is your jihad not mine.

I even respected your reasoning although it think it's deplorable -you denigrated all the good work we did together.
and you tossed it away over politics. This is all on you -don't make it about me.
Click to expand...

It was a right-wing site and the only mentioning of a Rothschild Bank by me was in the very same video that I've posted here .. liar. :0) Let me put a smiley face on that so it won't be perceived as 'angry' .. as if I give a damn.

Stop right there .. WE did NO work together. I did my own research .. often didn't agree with your conclusions and I said so. I stayed cordial, but it didn't take long for me to see that you were just a right-winger into the issue because it demonized Obama and Hillary Clinton. In fact, that's why I wouldn't post in your endless diatribe to nowhere.

You're a partisan right-winger . and as I said to you .. my bad for not recognizing that sooner.

No need to drag this out. Post whatever makes you happy .. I'll do the same. No need for any illusions about respect.
 
oh..and if the Libyan Civil war thread "was all about politics" -why did I start it back in 2013 when I saw the 2014 civil war comiong because of militia rule?
Maybe I was clued in and you weren't -huh? It's the same reason I kept it going after the Nov 8th election.
It was a timeline of the Civil war, with in depth Libya studies -why i mentioned cultural thing like Roman ruins
and Libyan jewelry.

It also became timely with Libyan migrants drowning in the Mediteranen -these are sub-saharan blacks -the same people the NTC killed after Qaddafi was assassinated.

You are completely wrong about my motivations -sure I posted many anti-Hillary intervention articles
But it was Hillary that made herself part of Libyan wars -not me. She was the "51st%" reason why Obama ok'd the intervention

Maybe that clears it up...maybe not..
 
blackascoal said:
It was a right-wing site and the only mentioning of a Rothschild Bank by me was in the very same video that I've posted here .. liar. :0) Let me put a smiley face on that so it won't be perceived as 'angry' .. as if I give a damn.

Stop right there .. WE did NO work together. I did my own research .. often didn't agree with your conclusions and I said so. I stayed cordial, but it didn't take long for me to see that you were just a right-winger into the issue because it demonized Obama and Hillary Clinton. In fact, that's why I wouldn't post in your endless diatribe to nowhere.

You're a partisan right-winger . and as I said to you .. my bad for not recognizing that sooner.

No need to drag this out. Post whatever makes you happy .. I'll do the same. No need for any illusions about respect.
Click to expand...
we correlated our research -more then once we both said we both worked as a team. we both had the Dems apoplectic they were the new warmongers.
who cares if it was a RW site? you were posting there!
you vids were good they were a good look at Libya under qaddafi. But Libya devolved into a failed terrorist state afterwards, and I saw it and knew the consequences for worldwide terrorism

.. why you feel the need to make everything -and I mean everything- partisan to the point you denigrate our work, and my work on the DCJ Libyan war threads is on you..
"what difference does it make at this point" ( Hillary on Bengazi) is how you force me to look at you now.
Partisanship is a mindfuck.
 
Norah said:
I have three questions for you please.

1. Do you believe that too many people are spending too much time on their phones and surrounded by technologies that disconnect them from the real world?
2. Do you believe that if those same people went outside and just simply went outside and drove a four wheeler around some pretty land and had some fun that it would be more beneficial to them than liking something on Facebook?
3. Do you think if those people put down their phone, went outside and planted a crop that they could then nurture, harvest and then eat that they would have a better appreciation for the process?
Click to expand...

This is my spot

IMG_2042.JPG
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top