the Mind boggles at Trump supporters.

All you've done is just parrot your own supposition and conjecture while ignoring the FACT that Trump EARNED his reputation YEARS AGO during his private sector PR cravings. To date, he has yet to apologize to President Obation YEARS AGO during his private sector PR cravings. To date, he has yet to ma for being wrong, the Central Park Five for bitching about their settlement for decades of wrongful imprisonment, or the numerous lawsuits and settlements regarding sexual harassment.

Oh, YOU lost too, genius, because your hero publically stated that he didn't give a damn or campaigned for your vote...he just was interested in the electoral vote....pretty elitist attitude, ehh?

And Franken has gotten his just desserts. Deal with it.
as for my

i agree on Franken ,a picture is worth a thousand washington post unnamed sources,so it is president obama but just TRUMP ,not president TRUMP,your bias is papabile.
 
Trump supporters should boggle the mind, we are true Americans, fed up with the swamp, fed up with political correctness, we want our country back, simple as that

MAGA
 
Remember to what I already asserted, the bulk of Slick Willy's revealed dalliances came during his second term, not during the actual elections...Monica Lewinsky being the topper. All the "I would have.." baloney from die hards would NOT have added up to those who would have sunk him.

What I previously stated stands, your moot point non-with standing (and I'm not trying to be mean spirited).

I go back to the mindset. The feminists who supported him, the whole MoveOn.org movement that started. This was after all his behavior came to light. The economy was good, his ratings were good and people didn't care.

Once that happens it's hard to put the genie back in the bottle. Someone before who might not have run because of their past actions can point towards Clinton and say he still seceded. No one needs to pull out now ala Gary Hart.

So if he Clinton had been shamed and was basically a lame duck because of his behavior that would have sent a totally different message. Instead he came back stronger than ever. Remember the SNL skit where he walks to the podium and says "I... Am... Bulletproof..." It was a very appropriate skit.

You and Rana are free to disagree with me and claim what I'm saying is irrelevant. But it was a game changer.
 
I go back to the mindset. The feminists who supported him, the whole MoveOn.org movement that started. This was after all his behavior came to light. The economy was good, his ratings were good and people didn't care.

Once that happens it's hard to put the genie back in the bottle. Someone before who might not have run because of their past actions can point towards Clinton and say he still seceded. No one needs to pull out now ala Gary Hart.

So if he Clinton had been shamed and was basically a lame duck because of his behavior that would have sent a totally different message. Instead he came back stronger than ever. Remember the SNL skit where he walks to the podium and says "I... Am... Bulletproof..." It was a very appropriate skit.

You and Rana are free to disagree with me and claim what I'm saying is irrelevant. But it was a game changer.

Truth: It was a Progressive mission statement to make such behavior as porn, power, and abuse MAINSTREAM. Now half a century after claiming that PORN = FREEDOM OF SPEECH and ART. The Traits of 50 years worth of fermentation of such an open society are now evident...its the LEFT WING finger point in the opposite direction, THE EVIL ASS REPUBLICANS are to blame...not the 50 + years of accepting and tolerating such societal behavior as 'mainstream'.

Its just like accusing conservatives of Jim Crow, the KKK, RACISM, BIGOTRY...etc., PROGRESSIVE fingerprints are all over these traits...but it is the evil ass Republicants that have magically switched places with the left wing progressives.

:laugh: Priceless. Still defending BJ BILL. Evil is as EVIL does. Another trait of the left: on one hand its SEPARATION of Church and State (even through that wall is never found in the Constitution).....today with a powerful senate seat up for grabs. Suddenly its OK to inject morality and faith into a government political race. All the main stream media type liars are attempting to convolute that government seat with MORALITY and RELIGION. How dare the right attempt to separate their moral compass from a government seat. Priceless...again
 
Last edited:
All you've done is just parrot your own supposition and conjecture while ignoring the FACT that Trump EARNED his reputation YEARS AGO during his private sector PR cravings. To date, he has yet to apologize to President Obama for being wrong, the Central Park Five for bitching about their settlement for decades of wrongful imprisonment, or the numerous lawsuits and settlements regarding sexual harassment.

Oh, YOU lost too, genius, because your hero publically stated that he didn't give a damn or campaigned for your vote...he just was interested in the electoral vote....pretty elitist attitude, ehh?

And Franken has gotten his just desserts. Deal with it.

as for my

i agree on Franken ,a picture is worth a thousand washington post unnamed sources,so it is president obama but just TRUMP ,not president TRUMP,your bias is papabile.


Were you drunk during that last post, because you're not exactly making sense per your sentence structure/spelling? And I posted a copy of my original post, not the nonsense you put out.
Get it together before your fingers hit the keys, bunky. The OP stands, as does my previous post here.
 
I go back to the mindset. The feminists who supported him, the whole MoveOn.org movement that started. This was after all his behavior came to light. The economy was good, his ratings were good and people didn't care.

Once that happens it's hard to put the genie back in the bottle. Someone before who might not have run because of their past actions can point towards Clinton and say he still seceded. No one needs to pull out now ala Gary Hart.

So if he Clinton had been shamed and was basically a lame duck because of his behavior that would have sent a totally different message. Instead he came back stronger than ever. Remember the SNL skit where he walks to the podium and says "I... Am... Bulletproof..." It was a very appropriate skit.

You and Rana are free to disagree with me and claim what I'm saying is irrelevant. But it was a game changer.

:bdh:
 
the attacks accusers were proven to be lying wack


monica was not an attack

it was consentual


the others refused to repeat their attack stories under oath


Paula jones own family said she was lying about being attacked
 
Let us be clear...."but, but, but Clinton..." is NOT an excuse or defense for Trump's history of boorish behavior (LONG before he entered politics). Also, it's not an answer to the OP.
 
the attacks accusers were proven to be lying wack


monica was not an attack

it was consentual


the others refused to repeat their attack stories under oath


Paula jones own family said she was lying about being attacked

True enough....but let's get real: the "but, but, but, Clinton...." is a fall back for the right wing...and even those not of the current conservative mindset keep trying to equate Clinton with Trump on the morals scale.

Again and again, Clinton ain't in office and wasn't elected with the misogynistic/racist baggage that Trump came with. To date, I haven't seen a but a scant few straight answers regarding the OP.
 
Let us be clear...."but, but, but Clinton..." is NOT an excuse or defense for Trump's history of boorish behavior (LONG before he entered politics). Also, it's not an answer to the OP.

I know you don't like hearing it but you have to understand the past to understand how we got here. And your question is not a bad one in the OP but you are demanding people give you a particular answer that denies other factors that go into a decision of who you vote for.
 
Trump supporters should boggle the mind, we are true Americans, fed up with the swamp, fed up with political correctness, we want our country back, simple as that

MAGA

A parrot of right wing slogans who avoids honestly answering the OP....typical Trump intellectually impotent coward.
 
Again, I didn't vote for Trump and I'm a Republican. Everything about the guy repulses me. So the question you ask isn't a bad one. But put the shoe on the other foot and ask the question below and as you say don't bring up Trump.

Can someone please explain to me how male Hillary Clinton supporter look their mothers, daughters, sisters, wives, girlfriends in the eye and try to justify Hillary's documented behavior and attitude toward women her husband had an affair with, took advantage of while in office or was accused of raping?

Because as I've been told by many you HAVE to vote for either one or the other. So if that is your belief you have to support the behavior of one of the two candidates.
 
I know you don't like hearing it but you have to understand the past to understand how we got here. And your question is not a bad one in the OP but you are demanding people give you a particular answer that denies other factors that go into a decision of who you vote for.

You're coming off as patronizing. You and I understand all too well "how we got here". It's the level of acceptance of ALL the pertinent information that diverts our conclusions. I'm not "demanding" anything when the FACTS of Trump's boorish behavior are OF PUBLIC RECORD. It's plain and simple.....unless people don't want to cop to certain attitudes. No one seems to have the intellectual honesty or courage to give a full, detailed response. Sadly, that's not surprising.
 
I love it when people just make crap up and post it like it's a fact.

Trump chumps just demonize everyone who nails Trump for the sociopathic con man that he is. If you're a white conservative who is against Trump, you're suddenly an "elitist"...which is comical being that Trump is an elitist born and bred.

How are minorities and gay people's lives different now?
 
Again, I didn't vote for Trump and I'm a Republican. Everything about the guy repulses me. So the question you ask isn't a bad one. But put the shoe on the other foot and ask the question below and as you say don't bring up Trump.

Can someone please explain to me how male Hillary Clinton supporter look their mothers, daughters, sisters, wives, girlfriends in the eye and try to justify Hillary's documented behavior and attitude toward women her husband had an affair with, took advantage of while in office or was accused of raping?

Because as I've been told by many you HAVE to vote for either one or the other. So if that is your belief you have to support the behavior of one of the two candidates.

I didn't say you voted for Trump nor support him. So essentially the question doesn't apply to you. That being said, why copy the right wing wonks tactic of "but, but, but Clinton"? And I did a write in vote...seems I was ahead of the Alabama curve. ;)
 
I didn't say you voted for Trump nor support him. So essentially the question doesn't apply to you. That being said, why copy the right wing wonks tactic of "but, but, but Clinton"? And I did a write in vote...seems I was ahead of the Alabama curve. ;)

I did Gary Johnson but maybe a write in is the way to go next time.
 
Back
Top