The Laschamp event and the demise of Neanderthals

Cypress said:
He seems curiously proud that he can find articles about eating dirt,
Click to expand...

I'm curiously proud I can show you for the LIAR you are. And now everyone can see it if they read this thread.

I guarantee you every geologist is laughing at you right now.

Cypress said:
and Googling tidbits
Click to expand...

I've already outclassed you on this thread. You barely could muster a description of what you were doing in the Andes. I knew more about the topic than you did.

The difference is: I am not the one lying about rock collecting in the Andes.


Cypress said:
of info about boring and obscure geology details.
Click to expand...

So boring you were WRONG when you said they don't do it. That's why I'm superior in that when I make a claim I can support it.


You make claims and never bother to support them. Primarily because you can't.

AND IT PISSES YOU OFF. That's the best part. You are caught and now you'll never have another comfortable day blathering about stuff you don't know to impress the yokels.

Someone got your number. LOL.
 
Daylight63 said:
I love to eat dirt!
Click to expand...
:lolup: ftfy

Sticking dirt and rocks in your mouth and grinding them on your teeth is unhygienic and can potentially damage tooth enamel.

Birds and reptiles shit on rocks Perry.

Your tooth enamel is softer than the silicate minerals found in most rocks. But feel free to damage your enamel and eat bird shit, Perry. :laugh:

While sticking a rock in your mouth may be a legacy geology tradition some old timers teach, you would be wise to keep dirt out of your mouth Perry, lol
 
Daylight63 said:
I love to eat dirt and bird shit!

LOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
Click to expand...
ftfy
It's very unhygienic to put rocks and dirt in your mouth Perry, not to mention it can damage your enamel.

Birds shit on rocks, silicate minerals can erode your enamel, and working on environmental clean-up sites expose you to benzene saturated soils.

But feel free to eat bird shit and benzene Perry!
 
Daylight63 said:
JOIDES Resolution!!!
Click to expand...

:laugh: JOIDES Resolution agrees with me that putting dirt and rocks is your mouth is fucking stupid because it is unhygienic and it will grind down your teeth enamel.

"(Putting rocks and sediment in your mouth) is not however recommended as chomping on sand might wear away your tooth enamel. Also this method would not be employed on the JOIDES Resolution due to the bacteria levels from deep sea samples."

Source: JOIDES Resolution

Back in the old days, it may have been common for some field geologists to put pieces of rock in their mouth.

But I personally don't know anyone stupid enough to put dirt in their mouths these days, except for Perry the PhD , lol
 
Last edited:
Daylight63 said:
The JOIDES resolution is hardly "weirdos making YouTubes".

But then you don't even know what the JOIDES Resolution is. LOL.

Look at you dancing around trying to salvage your point. You don't know "dozens" of geologists. God, give that shit up, festus.

LOL.

You are so "caught" now, it's not even funny and you think you can weasel your way out of this. You are such a fuckin' lame-ass loser!

LOL.
Click to expand...
^^^
Traded services in the community shower for extra computer time. Awesome, Perry!

My humble advice is for you to start being yourself, as retarded as you've proved to be, son.
 
Cypress said:
He seems curiously proud that he can find articles about eating dirt, and Googling tidbits of info about boring and obscure geology details.

That is not normal for a professional who has responsibilities and duties at work.
Click to expand...
He's trying to act normal but lacks worldliness compared to his apparent age.

Agreed 100%. Ergo, something is off.
 
Cypress said:
It looks like his facility doesn't open the computer room until 9 am at the earliest , lol
Click to expand...
A few more minutes of peace? LOL

What about those Neanderthals, eh? Which JPP members do you think have more than their fair share of Neanderthal DNA?

679d968a66d9783fcd53205e1006b732.png
 
phys.org

A world map of Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in modern humans

Most non-Africans possess at least a little bit Neanderthal DNA. But a new map of archaic ancestry—published March 28 in Current Biology—suggests that many bloodlines around the world, particularly of South Asian descent, may actually be a bit more Denisovan, a mysterious population of hominids...
phys.org phys.org
Most non-Africans possess at least a little bit Neanderthal DNA. But a new map of archaic ancestry—published March 28 in Current Biology—suggests that many bloodlines around the world, particularly of South Asian descent, may actually be a bit more Denisovan, a mysterious population of hominids that lived around the same time as the Neanderthals. The analysis also proposes that modern humans interbred with Denisovans about 100 generations after their trysts with Neanderthals.

The Harvard Medical School/UCLA research team that created the map also used comparative genomics to make predictions about where Denisovan and Neanderthal genes may be impacting modern human biology. While there is still much to uncover, Denisovan genes can potentially be linked to a more subtle sense of smell in Papua New Guineans and high-altitude adaptions in Tibetans. Meanwhile, Neanderthal genes found in people around the world most likely contribute to tougher skin and hair.

"There are certain classes of genes that modern humans inherited from the archaic humans with whom they interbred, which may have helped the modern humans to adapt to the new environments in which they arrived," says senior author David Reich, a geneticist at Harvard Medical School and the Broad Institute. "On the flip side, there was negative selection to systematically remove ancestry that may have been problematic from modern humans. We can document this removal over the 40,000 years since these admixtures occurred."

aworldmapofn.jpg
 
Cypress said:
I actually think we have to go even more primitive for certain MAGA morons. I've often thought that Homo erectus DNA must be in the MAGA gene pool!
Click to expand...
LOL It appears so but other factors may be at play such as elderly dementia and those dropped too many times as a baby.
 
Dutch Uncle said:
phys.org

A world map of Neanderthal and Denisovan ancestry in modern humans

Most non-Africans possess at least a little bit Neanderthal DNA. But a new map of archaic ancestry—published March 28 in Current Biology—suggests that many bloodlines around the world, particularly of South Asian descent, may actually be a bit more Denisovan, a mysterious population of hominids...
phys.org phys.org
Most non-Africans possess at least a little bit Neanderthal DNA. But a new map of archaic ancestry—published March 28 in Current Biology—suggests that many bloodlines around the world, particularly of South Asian descent, may actually be a bit more Denisovan, a mysterious population of hominids that lived around the same time as the Neanderthals. The analysis also proposes that modern humans interbred with Denisovans about 100 generations after their trysts with Neanderthals.

The Harvard Medical School/UCLA research team that created the map also used comparative genomics to make predictions about where Denisovan and Neanderthal genes may be impacting modern human biology. While there is still much to uncover, Denisovan genes can potentially be linked to a more subtle sense of smell in Papua New Guineans and high-altitude adaptions in Tibetans. Meanwhile, Neanderthal genes found in people around the world most likely contribute to tougher skin and hair.

"There are certain classes of genes that modern humans inherited from the archaic humans with whom they interbred, which may have helped the modern humans to adapt to the new environments in which they arrived," says senior author David Reich, a geneticist at Harvard Medical School and the Broad Institute. "On the flip side, there was negative selection to systematically remove ancestry that may have been problematic from modern humans. We can document this removal over the 40,000 years since these admixtures occurred."

aworldmapofn.jpg
Click to expand...
I read somewhere that people of the Himalayas have more Denisovan DNA, and there is something about that genetic heritage that allows them to breathe oxygen more efficiently at high elevation.
 
Cypress said:
I read somewhere that people of the Himalayas have more Denisovan DNA, and there is something about that genetic heritage that allows them to breathe oxygen more efficiently at high elevation.
Click to expand...
That part of genetics is a knowledge gap for me but as the link above noted, intermixing with Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA allowed modern humans to adapt to environmental changes including the Tibetans.

While there is still much to uncover, Denisovan genes can potentially be linked to a more subtle sense of smell in Papua New Guineans and high-altitude adaptions in Tibetans. Meanwhile, Neanderthal genes found in people around the world most likely contribute to tougher skin and hair.

"There are certain classes of genes that modern humans inherited from the archaic humans with whom they interbred, which may have helped the modern humans to adapt to the new environments in which they arrived,
 
Dutch Uncle said:
That part of genetics is a knowledge gap for me but as the link above noted, intermixing with Neanderthal and Denisovan DNA allowed modern humans to adapt to environmental changes including the Tibetans.

While there is still much to uncover, Denisovan genes can potentially be linked to a more subtle sense of smell in Papua New Guineans and high-altitude adaptions in Tibetans. Meanwhile, Neanderthal genes found in people around the world most likely contribute to tougher skin and hair.

"There are certain classes of genes that modern humans inherited from the archaic humans with whom they interbred, which may have helped the modern humans to adapt to the new environments in which they arrived,
Click to expand...

Great, that's what I remember reading too.
I never had the Neanderthal test done when I patronized one of those commercial DNA companies.

I read about one person in Africa whose genetic analysis showed something anomalous that could not be linked to Neanderthal or Denisovan, and there was speculation it was a genetic relic from Homo heidelbergensis. But I don't know what happened with that conjecture.
 
Cypress said:
Great, that's what I remember reading too.
I never had the Neanderthal test done when I patronized one of those commercial DNA companies.

I read about one person in Africa whose genetic analysis showed something anomalous that could not be linked to Neanderthal or Denisovan, and there was speculation it was a genetic relic from Homo heidelbergensis. But I don't know what happened with that conjecture.
Click to expand...
It's been several years since my DNA was tested. I should do it again to compare results. Mine didn't show archaic DNA but it can be inferred by ancestral region. Specifically, mostly Western Europe.

7ni9x8.jpg
 
Dutch Uncle said:
It's been several years since my DNA was tested. I should do it again to compare results. Mine didn't show archaic DNA but it can be inferred by ancestral region. Specifically, mostly Western Europe.

7ni9x8.jpg
Click to expand...
I think you told me mostly English?

Mine was overwhelming Russian, Lithuanian, Belarusian.

Yep, the Danube River seems to the boundary across which your DNA never reached!
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top