The Language of God

You failed to answer the question so I'll restate it:

"Which is it. Did we NOT descend from corn, and you made that up about biologists saying we did? That would mean you were wrong. Or or did we descend from corn, meaning that you would also be a descendent of Obama."

Either way you're wrong. Seriously, if you want to sit here and say we didn't descend from a lower order then you may do so, but you look like a retard. Either you lied about biologists saying we descended from corn (this is what you did, you lied), or we did descend from corn. If you want to make the case that we descended from corn, you have a lot of work ahead of you. But I know you don't want to attempt that. So the other alternative is that you lied.

Just admit it and I'll let the issue lie. Biologists do not say we descended from corn. Just say that you were wrong in saying that they did suggest such a thing, Mr. BS.
 
ib1yysguy said:
You failed to answer the question so I'll restate it:

"Which is it. Did we NOT descend from corn, and you made that up about biologists saying we did? That would mean you were wrong. Or or did we descend from corn, meaning that you would also be a descendent of Obama."

Either way you're wrong. Seriously, if you want to sit here and say we didn't descend from a lower order then you may do so, but you look like a retard. Either you lied about biologists saying we descended from corn (this is what you did, you lied), or we did descend from corn. If you want to make the case that we descended from corn, you have a lot of work ahead of you. But I know you don't want to attempt that. So the other alternative is that you lied.

Just admit it and I'll let the issue lie. Biologists do not say we descended from corn. Just say that you were wrong in saying that they did suggest such a thing, Mr. BS.
Click to expand...

You're really starting to bore me. I know what I said, you know what I said, why do you keep trying to tell me I said things I never said? It just doesn't make good sense to me, we both know you're lying. Maybe you think some lazy people here will just take it for granted you are being honest, but... pft... they obviously don't know you too well, if that's the case.

I don't know how to answer your question, because it is stupid and not well formulated. There is absolutely ZERO scientific, biological, or archeological evidence that human beings ever "descended" from anything else. That is a fact. We have discovered that certain species have changed over time (evolved) but there are also species which have changed virtually none since prehistoric times. Some people have theorized that we may have evolved from a common ancestor of other primates, but nothing has been found to render that theory valid. This is why the phrase "Missing Link" was formed, because there is no evidence of direct connection to any other species than our own. We simply have no proof of what humans were before they were human. We have theories, ideas, concepts, and those are all well and good, I have no problem with people "thinking" this or that may have occurred, but it's genuine dishonesty to state that these theories are proven facts and we should just accept them on faith.
 
:D

You have made me a happy man, since anyone who watches the Discovery channel, went to college, or has an IQ above 60, knows everything you just said is totally whack.

You, sir, may register at the Department of Pwnership on Monday morning with me as your sponsor.

For the record: You still haven't said whether we descended from corn or whether you were lying about saying biologists said we descended from corn. Choose one!
 
ib1yysguy said:
:D

You have made me a happy man, since anyone who watches the Discovery channel, went to college, or has an IQ above 60, knows everything you just said is totally whack.

You, sir, may register at the Department of Pwnership on Monday morning with me as your sponsor.

For the record: You still haven't said whether we descended from corn or whether you were lying about saying biologists said we descended from corn. Choose one!
Click to expand...

Like I said, there is no scientific, biological, or archeological evidence that humans "descended" from anything else. Doesn't exist in this reality. At best, there is a theory, but there is no physical evidence to support it. You can "claim" that I am wrong, and you can "argue" that Discovery channel disputes me, but you can't show us the proof that humans descended from a lower life form, because that simply does not exist. It doesn't matter that you believe it, or all the people who go to college believe it, your "faith" isn't proof something is true.

You can come up with all the cute sophomoric phrases you like, and you can ridicule me as much as you want to, but you can't show us something that doesn't exist. You can believe it, you can lie about it being a fact, and you can probably convince gullible idiots to accept it as a fact, but... you just can't prove it. That's okay, because there are lots of things science can't prove, it doesn't mean they are true or false, just that they remain unknown. But you go on preaching your Gospel, I am all in favor of Freedom of Religion!
 
I'm pretty sure everyone on this site sees how retarded all that was. It doesn't require any effort from me. Getting you to say "there's no evidence we descended from a lower order!!!" is perfect.
 
"There is absolutely ZERO scientific, biological, or archeological evidence that human beings ever "descended" from anything else. "

Huh? Ever hear of DNA, the fossil record, behavioral science...any of that?

You can't just say stuff, Dix. It has to be true to merit any consideration.
 
Last edited:
Blasphemers all, You will all burn in eternal damnation for your sins!

btw God loves you.
 
Onceler said:
"There is absolutely ZERO scientific, biological, or archeological evidence that human beings ever "descended" from anything else. "

Huh? Ever hear of DNA, the fossil record, behavioral science...any of that?

You can't just say stuff, Dix. It has to be true to merit any consideration.
Click to expand...

Yep, I've heard of DNA, nothing in human DNA concludes we came from some other lower form of life. Sorry. I've also heard of the fossil record, nothing we have ever found or discovered has proven that humans descended from another lower form of life. Sorry again. And, of course I have heard of behavioral science, I have a degree in Psychology, and nothing in that field even pertains to this, so why did you bring it up?

None of this PROVES humans descended from a lower life form. And here is something else to consider, no genus has ever changed into another completely different genus, it doesn't happen, there is no record of it, no fossils to look at, not a damn thing except a theory.

Now, if you guys want to present some proof here, go for it! I'm all ears! As of now, you haven't done a damn thing except run your ignorant mouths and lie. You're free as a bird to think whatever you want to, or say whatever you like about me, I just presented THE FACTS here, and you seem to have a difficult time with that. Sorry... again!
 
Watermark said:
Dixie, how are you defining "scientific evidence"?
Click to expand...

Well, I guess I should really clarify for the anally retentive out there... "EVIDENCE" can be anything to anyone, and it's often subjective. I could easily claim flowers are "evidence" god exists, so it may be a little misleading to say there is "no scientific evidence," I should have stated, there is no conclusive scientific proof.
 
Dixie said:
Well, I guess I should really clarify for the anally retentive out there... "EVIDENCE" can be anything to anyone, and it's often subjective. I could easily claim flowers are "evidence" god exists, so it may be a little misleading to say there is "no scientific evidence," I should have stated, there is no conclusive scientific proof.
Click to expand...

Evidence in a legal sense is... "A material fact tending to prove or disprove a question in contraversy."
 
Jarod said:
Evidence in a legal sense is... "A material fact tending to prove or disprove a question in contraversy."
Click to expand...

In that context, my original statement is correct. In spite of what these "scientists" keep telling us here, there is absolutely NO 'material fact tending to prove' humans descended from anything else. There is indeed a theory, an idea, a concept, but material facts? Nope, doesn't exist, has never been discovered.

Now they will act like this is the craziest most stupid thing they've ever heard, because it directly contradicts their 'religious' beliefs. Fuckin' fundamentalist extremists!
 
Dixie said:
In that context, my original statement is correct. In spite of what these "scientists" keep telling us here, there is absolutely NO 'material fact tending to prove' humans descended from anything else. There is indeed a theory, an idea, a concept, but material facts? Nope, doesn't exist, has never been discovered.

Now they will act like this is the craziest most stupid thing they've ever heard, because it directly contradicts their 'religious' beliefs. Fuckin' fundamentalist extremists!
Click to expand...

But the evolutionary idea of how things came to be seems more plausible than your god and the magic beans story.
 
AssHatZombie said:
But the evolutionary idea of how things came to be seems more plausible than your god and the magic beans story.
Click to expand...

I don't have a "god and the magic beans story" but if we want to use the example of "magic beans" it would seem more applicable to the theory of evolution. We are expected to accept that basic elements sprinkled here from the Big Bang, 'magically' transformed into all he wondrous and beautiful forms of life around us? Sounds a lot like magic beans to me!

The only thing that seems plausible to me, is that some initial source of intelligence, designed and organized the universe, so as to allow the growth and emergence of life. It makes more sense than magic beans!

We should know, and it should be obvious, that human spirituality has some connection to human achievement. We are the most accomplished species, and the only ones who practice spirituality, that isn't likely coincidence. We should also be able to understand the attribute of human spirituality would have long ago fallen by the wayside, if it weren't important to the species. Your own Darwinian theories support this. Yet we continue to deal with more and more of you idiots who want to ignore the obvious. Ironically proving that man is indeed inferior to "God."

Happenstance is not an explanation for something as complex and beautiful as life. It defies any logic we have ever known, to assume all of this is the mere result of chance and randomness. Also, to draw such a conclusion, is contradictory to science itself, as science is supposed to seek answers, not make conclusions.
 
Happenstance is not an explanation for something as complex and beautiful as life. It defies any logic we have ever known, to assume all of this is the mere result of chance and randomness. Also, to draw such a conclusion, is contradictory to science itself, as science is supposed to seek answers, not make conclusions.
//

Yes it does defy current logic. But then so did Bacteria and viri causing diseases.
The world being round was not logical. It was logical at the time for the earth to be the center of the universe.

Dixie you seem to think this is all we will ever know? This has been a conservative trait since before recorded time of man.

I am just glad we no longer burn insightful people at the stake and put them thru the inquisition.
 
Dixie said:
I don't have a "god and the magic beans story" but if we want to use the example of "magic beans" it would seem more applicable to the theory of evolution. We are expected to accept that basic elements sprinkled here from the Big Bang, 'magically' transformed into all he wondrous and beautiful forms of life around us? Sounds a lot like magic beans to me!

The only thing that seems plausible to me, is that some initial source of intelligence, designed and organized the universe, so as to allow the growth and emergence of life. It makes more sense than magic beans!

We should know, and it should be obvious, that human spirituality has some connection to human achievement. We are the most accomplished species, and the only ones who practice spirituality, that isn't likely coincidence. We should also be able to understand the attribute of human spirituality would have long ago fallen by the wayside, if it weren't important to the species. Your own Darwinian theories support this. Yet we continue to deal with more and more of you idiots who want to ignore the obvious. Ironically proving that man is indeed inferior to "God."

Happenstance is not an explanation for something as complex and beautiful as life. It defies any logic we have ever known, to assume all of this is the mere result of chance and randomness. Also, to draw such a conclusion, is contradictory to science itself, as science is supposed to seek answers, not make conclusions.
Click to expand...

It makes sense that traits of all kinds come from genes, and that these traits are inherited through the gene, making offspring more or less successful, depending upon the pressures at play in the environment. that makes a lot of sense.

It makes more sense than "god wanted a man, and so it was".
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top