The Ideal Political Party

FactsRStubborn said:
Actually I am about to go take one. Guess I will name it after you. Have a great day.

Don't forget your 25 Hail Obama's and to pray toward Mecca to honor your dear leader
Click to expand...

I'm already having a totally GREAT day. And you can name your shit anything you like. How about FactsRStubborn? You idiot.
 
FactsRStubborn said:
Sure sweety, you weren't trying to impress me, that is why you brought it up.

Let me guess, you are one of the 1% who doesn't need the gobblement, of course you probably don't believe in religion either, but you have this longing to "help those less fortunate". But, instead of digging into your own deep pockets and doing it yourself, you just blather on about how "the government should do this and the government should do that". Then you sit around with your other libtardiot berkenstock wearing douchebag friends and wax poetic about how compassionate you are by demanding that more and more people get a meager subsistence from the federal gobblement.

Why can't you libs just put your money where your mouth is and voluntarly support a po person? You claim to have run a couple of businesses, so surely you know that if you can cut out the middle man there are efficiencies.

Surely you and caring libtardiots like you could just gather up a po family and support them. You are part of the 1% and obviously don't need the money. Right sugarbritches?
Click to expand...

You define yourself as ignorant. Not my doing.

Facts are stubborn .. and really difficult to grasp for the unlearned mind.
 
Well, that's two threads down....

His purpose is to derail and dumb-down each discussion, then devolve it into an insufferably-boring pissing match whereby he can showcase his only talent: feces-flinging.
 
blackascoal said:
There should be some kind of penalty for using "Facts" in a screenname held by someone so incredibly blind to them.

Unless you've made a lot of money .. I've probaly made more money than you have.

I have a degree, worked for the US Congress, and I own two businesses .. do you have that?

Socialism selfish??? :0)

That kinda' defines you and demonstrates that you haven't spent much time behind a book.
Click to expand...

Curious... in those two businesses, do you split the profits equally with your employees? (not trying to be a smart ass, actually curious)
 
First rule in the ideal government....

If the country has positive GDP growth and you outspend your revenues... no member of Congress or the WH shall get paid until that deficit spending is paid back.
 
Superfreak said:
Curious... in those two businesses, do you split the profits equally with your employees? (not trying to be a smart ass, actually curious)
Click to expand...

:0)

In our art business the only other employee is my wife .. and she takes the lions share of everything. :0(

In the IT business I pay a fair wage. I do not split the profits.

That isn't what socialism is .. if that's what you meant.
 
Superfreak said:
First rule in the ideal government....

If the country has positive GDP growth and you outspend your revenues... no member of Congress or the WH shall get paid until that deficit spending is paid back.
Click to expand...

First rule is to have a government that the people control.
 
Yurt said:
some of mine:

stay out of people's social lives when their lives do not effect others. for example - support gay marriage, allow polygamy, but not underage sex etc..

lower the age of majority from 18 to 16.

fiscal responsibility. if you lower taxes, lower spending. stop coddling the rich and allow a tax increase on those making over 400K a year.

expand medicare by taking away the age requirement. repeal obamacare.

make it impossible to raid SS in order to "borrow" funds
Click to expand...
I agree with all those pointes except making the age of majority 16 and repealing the ACA. Hell even 18 year olds don't defend their political freedoms what makes you think a 16 yo would?
 
Yurt said:
what is your ideal political party? how would they represent americans and what would be their platform(s)?
Click to expand...
Isn't an "ideal political party" an oxymoron? Isn't the idea behind a political party for people of often disparate beliefs to rally around the beliefs that they do have in common and to compromise on those they don't so as to support and advance a common agenda?
 
annata said:
abolish politcal partys, they are nothing butr self serving for career politicians.
Partisianship is bad enough - an "attachment" as Buddhists would say, the level of hyperpartisianship ensures gridlock, and party before policy.

I dumped mine -will you do the same, and declare your independence from the duopoly ???
afterall DC functions so well, :palm: more gridlock then the capitol beltway
Click to expand...
Isn't that a rather niave view?
 
blackascoal said:
:0)

In our art business the only other employee is my wife .. and she takes the lions share of everything. :0(

In the IT business I pay a fair wage. I do not split the profits.

That isn't what socialism is .. if that's what you meant.
Click to expand...

Well, how much do you pay? $100,000 a year? One month paid vacation? Full employer paid medical benefits? Full employer sponsored pension plan? Please elaborate. This is your chance to show us how you walk the walk. If you don't do all of the things I have outlined, please explain why you do not. Thank you
 
The problem with political parties is that the easiest way to rally a group of diverse people is to give them a common enemy. Whether the methods are factual or invented, if you give them an enemy they will stick together.

That is what has happened with the 2 big political parties in this country. This is why both sides resort to spouting lies to rally the people against the other side.
 
blackascoal said:
:0)

In our art business the only other employee is my wife .. and she takes the lions share of everything. :0(

In the IT business I pay a fair wage. I do not split the profits.

That isn't what socialism is .. if that's what you meant.
Click to expand...

You keep saying "that isn't what socialism is". So why don't you elaborate on what exactly YOU think it is. Thanks in advance
 
USFREEDOM911 said:
Polygamy would have to carry a provison that the "husband" has to provide all the support and can't go and file for Government assistance.
Click to expand...
Not that I support polygomy (being married to one woman is hard enough, who'd be insane enough to want two or more?) but why single out polygomist?
 
Derp Derp said:
Not that I support polygomy (being married to one woman is hard enough, who'd be insane enough to want two or more?) but why single out polygomist?
Click to expand...

Very true. Why not make a husband show he can support his wife before they are allowed to marry?

And Mott, its not two wives that would scare me. It would be having two mother-in-laws.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top