The election is already over....

CFM said:
You mean something that isn't used to determine the winner?

Trump ran away with the electoral vote and that is why HE is President and Hillary isn't.
Click to expand...

If you read through the thread, the question was what more people support - not more states or electoral votes.
 
Thing1 said:
Millions of votes. Had Trump won the popular by that much, he'd be saying it was the biggest win in history, and you wouldn't bat an eyelash.
Click to expand...

^^^Someone that clearly does not understand how the system works or he wouldn't bring up something that isn't used to determine the winner.
 
CFM said:
^^^Someone that clearly does not understand how the system works or he wouldn't bring up something that isn't used to determine the winner.
Click to expand...

Again, read through what was being discussed. I wasn't talking about what determines the winner. I respect the electoral college system.
 
Thing1 said:
If you read through the thread, the question was what more people support - not more states or electoral votes.
Click to expand...

You said ran away with the popular vote.

I read YOUR response. You continue mentioning something, despite being gone long enough to have learned better, that is irrelevant in how we pick the winner.
 
Man, conservatives really don't like talking about the popular vote. Bet they would if Trump won it.

Get used to it. It's unlikely that a Republican wins the popular again.
 
Thing1 said:
Again, read through what was being discussed. I wasn't talking about what determines the winner. I respect the electoral college system.
Click to expand...

Again, I read YOUR response.

To keep saying what you're saying shows you don't understand the system nor why it was put in place.
 
Thing1 said:
Man, conservatives really don't like talking about the popular vote. Bet they would if Trump won it.

Get used to it. It's unlikely that a Republican wins the popular again.
Click to expand...

Liberals really like talking about something that doesn't determine the winner.

According to the Constitution, they don't have to. Unless Congress increases the number of seats in the House of Representatives, something that would become law if the President signed it, the winner is the first person to 270 ELECTORAL VOTES.
 
Darth Omar said:
But it’s a fair point that Fox wins the ratings war because no one is interested in crowding their share of the market.

Makes zero sense from a business aspect. Why doesn’t Jeff Zucker wake up one morning and realize Fox is beating him because no one else is competing for Fox’s market-share? In every other business Zucker would call a meeting and demand that his outfit start appealing to conservatives—before MSNBC did.

Their agenda/ideology is more important to them than anything.
Click to expand...
an inconvenient but obvious truth. FOX is fairly critical of Trump ( not Hannity -but in general).
That gives it credibility that the Propaganda Leftists networks don't have.

If they were to moderate just a bit, and become more more willing to cover other then
"orange man bad", they'd get far more viewers
 
Thing1 said:
Millions of votes. Had Trump won the popular by that much, he'd be saying it was the biggest win in history, and you wouldn't bat an eyelash.
Click to expand...

You mean like you’re doing lol?

2.8% is arguably a statistical tie. The country was split down the middle in the popular vote. For some odd reason, it’s not reported that way.
 
Darth Omar said:
You mean like you’re doing lol?

2.8% is arguably a statistical tie. The country was split down the middle in the popular vote. For some odd reason, it’s not reported that way.
Click to expand...

It's not a "statistical tie." Your talking about margin of error when it comes to POLLS - that's why they say 3% is statistically insignificant in a POLL. A vote is REAL, it's not a POLL.

2.8% is a huge difference in a real result.
 
dukkha said:
an inconvenient but obvious truth. FOX is fairly critical of Trump ( not Hannity -but in general).
That gives it credibility that the Propaganda Leftists networks don't have.

If they were to moderate just a bit, and become more more willing to cover other then
"orange man bad", they'd get far more viewers
Click to expand...

Why do you guys keep mentioning only Hannity?

Unless you watch Fox during the afternoon, it's all pro-Trump, all the time. Fox & Friends, Carlson, Watters, Ingraham, et al.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top