The continuous idiocy of guns in America;

[archives]

The Second Amendment does not speak to gun laws, lenient or not.

Oh, boy, here we go, pulling out their bumper sticker understanding of the Second Amendment, then according to your view these dimwits can claim self defense under the Stand Your Ground law since the Second Amendment doesn’t speak to gun laws

 

[Into the Night]

”Could Missouri’s ‘stand your ground’ law apply to the Super Bowl celebration shooters?”

“KANSAS CITY, Mo. (AP) — The man accused of firing the first shots at the Kansas City Chiefs Super Bowl rally told authorities he felt threatened, while a second man said he pulled the trigger because someone was shooting at him, according to court documents.”

“Experts say that even though the shooting left one bystander dead and roughly two dozen people injured, 23-year-old Lyndell Mays and 18-year-old Dominic Miller might have good cases for self-defense through the state’s “stand your ground” law.”

“Trial attorney Daniel Ross described the stand your ground law as a “formidable defense” that he and many other Kansas City defense attorneys anticipate will be used in Mays’ and Miller’s cases. He said the law puts the onus on the prosecution to disprove claims that a shooting is lawful self-defense.”

“Collateral damage under Missouri law is excused if you’re actually engaged in lawful self-defense and there’s other folks injured,” he said.”

“Kansas City already was grappling with the shooting of Yarl, a Black teenager, who survived a bullet wound to the head when he went to the wrong house in April 2023 to pick up his brothers. Andrew Lester, an 85-year-old white man, is planning to claim self-defense when he goes to trial in October. His attorney said the retiree was terrified by the stranger on his doorstep.”

“Missouri has few firearm regulations, and two of its cities — Kansas City and St. Louis — annually have among the nation’s highest homicide rates.”

https://apnews.com/article/chiefs-p...r-ground-law-fc7b0658055e285079430dd9ae6d602d

Worked for Rittenhouse and Zimmerman, why not these two dimwits, they thought they were protecting themselves just like Kyle and George?

Now seeing under Missouri law they may have been acting in self defense, does that make them “good guys with a gun?”

And the idiocy continues

It won't work. Gang shootings are not in self defense.

Missouri does not have the nation's highest homicide rates. Mississippi does.

You only justifying carrying for self defense everytime you post something like this, you know.

 

[Into the Night]

Ah, “earl,” as a rule, cities don’t make gun laws, KC and St Louis don’t, the State does, a dead fish stinks from the head down, now do you want to return to the topic

It is unconstitutional to ban or limit guns, Sock.

 

[Into the Night]

Once again, “earl,” point is with State gun laws so lenient, nearly anyone can get a gun, no matter where they live or who runs the Government where they live, and now, the same two dimwits can plead the case of self defense using the same lenient State gun laws

As I said, the gun idiocy continues

It is legal to own and carry guns, Sock. The Constitution of the United States and the Constitution of the State of Missouri is not 'idiocy'.

 

[Into the Night]

Really, looks like the whole State is plagued with gun violence (https://efsgv.org/state/missouri/), there is a reason it ranks fourth in the country in gun homicides

So carry a gun in Missouri.

 

[Into the Night]

But without the gun those shooters couldn’t shoot anyone, duh

So carry a gun.

 

[Into the Night]

What a lame, stupid and tiresome argument. Why is self-defense such a bad thing to progressive leftists who think that defunding police, releasing criminals into the public realm and Fascistic tactics against political opponents is awesome?

You just answered your own question. Because Democrats support crime and criminals.

 

[Into the Night]

The Second Amendment does not speak to gun laws, lenient or not.

The 2nd Amendment IS the gun law.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

There was no logic, only a stupid cartoon

it's obviously logic above your school grade.

 

[SmarterthanYou]

Wasn’t wrong the first time, nor “again,” guns are everywhere in Missouri:

“Missouri law generally allows firearms to be carried by adults, including anyone over 18, at parades and other large-scale gatherings such as the parade downtown and the rally at Union Station, which were expected to draw hundreds of thousands of people”
https://www.kansascity.com/news/local/article285582417.html#storylink=cpy


“ As for Board Bill 107, there would still be an obstacle to enforcing it, even if approved locally. It would either need approval through a Republican-heavy Missouri legislature or Missouri voters would need to pass a ballot initiative that allows local municipalities to control gun laws.”
https://fox2now.com/news/missouri/st-louis-board-of-aldermen-pass-bill-to-ban-open-carry-of-guns/

your feelings are not facts.

 

[NiftyNiblick]

I can't believe that people are still complaining about gunplay in America.

You either support the great American sport of gunfighting
or you're ready for a brand new republic to replace America.

It's one or the other.

Stop looking for moderate solutions in a radical situation.
It looks foolish.

 

[Lionfish]

The 2nd Amendment IS the gun law.

Actually, the law comes from God.

 

[Taichiliberal]

Anchovies posted:
“Missouri has few firearm regulations, and two of its cities — Kansas City and St. Louis — annually have among the nation’s highest homicide rates.”



The government of Kansas City: Democrats have long held a significant dominance of politics throughout the city. In the last 100 years, only four Republicans have served as mayor.



Tishaura Oneda Jones (/tɪʃɑːrʌ/ tish-ARE-ə; born March 10, 1972) is an American politician who has served as the mayor of St. Louis, Missouri since April 2021. A member of the Missouri Democratic Party, Jones served from 2008 to 2013 in the Missouri House of Representatives; and as Treasurer of the City of St.


Poor Anchovies.

And what party is responsible for blocking federal gun control laws that would initiate universal background checks? Re-instating the 1994 AWB?

 

[Taichiliberal]

City DA’s and prosecutors and mayors determine who is prosecuted and who isn’t prosecuted, Anchovies.

Poor Anchovies.

Prosecution is after the crime has been committed.

Currently, the Republican Party controls the offices of governor, secretary of state, attorney general, and both chambers of the state legislature.

And then there's this:

https://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/state-gun-laws/missouri/

So spare us all your myopic ravings, Earl.

 

[Into the Night]

Actually, the law comes from God.

Whether you believe the 2nd amendment was inspired by God or not, it still exists as the gun law.

 

[Into the Night]

I can't believe that people are still complaining about gunplay in America.

You either support the great American sport of gunfighting
or you're ready for a brand new republic to replace America.

It's one or the other.

Stop looking for moderate solutions in a radical situation.
It looks foolish.

Stop looking for a radical 'solution' to a moderate problem.

You can't stop criminals from getting guns.
You CAN stop a criminal from using a gun for very long though. Shoot back.

 

[Into the Night]

And what party is responsible for blocking federal gun control laws that would initiate universal background checks? Re-instating the 1994 AWB?

Unconstitutional.

 

[Into the Night]

Prosecution is after the crime has been committed.

Currently, the Republican Party controls the offices of governor, secretary of state, attorney general, and both chambers of the state legislature.

And then there's this:

https://www.nraila.org/gun-laws/state-gun-laws/missouri/

So spare us all your myopic ravings, Earl.

St Louis is not the State of Missouri, dummy.