good lord, he almost sounds proud of it......
I dropped out a word. The same pricks that comprise the REPUBLICAN Party today.
good lord, he almost sounds proud of it......
She isn't backtracking, sorry, and you are one of the deplorable people, squealing because this hit you.

I dropped out a word. The same pricks that comprise the REPUBLICAN Party today.
like most liberals you have trouble not contradicting yourself....
1) Yeah, sure you did. lol
2) It's the social policies of the Republicans that demonstrate their ignorance.
3) The Democratic Party is considerably different than as recently as the 50s
4) The "ic" at the end makes it the formal name of the party whether you like it or not.
As I said, I dropped out a word. The pricks I was referring to are today's REPUBLICAN pricks. Same social conservatives as the Southern Democrats back then. The party label is meaningless. They change. It's that they were conservatives.
I think that you're more confused now than you were before. Not understanding history or facts is why.
You coined the phrase Democrat Party? Now you're just not an ignorant rube, you're a lying ignorant rube. It fits perfectly with your knowledge of history.
You mean like the Japanese fascists wanted someone who acted "rashly," such as Harry Truman?The ISIS thing is probably true, also.
They want someone who will act rashly, I'm sure. Just like OBL likely loved our reaction to 9/11 w/ invading Iraq.
She isn't backtracking, sorry, and you are one of the deplorable people, squealing because this hit you.
Squealing? Hillary needs to do more of this lol.
The way they get all sick, weak, and shaky about killing Muzzies, I refer to them as Dhimmicrats.close, but I prefer DemocRat......more descriptive.....
Prove I'm lying.![]()
she's retracting it back as fast as stuck pig.Squealing? Hillary needs to do more of this lol.
she's retracting it back as fast as stuck pig.
The Clinton campaign has been running on smashing Trump. She has no agenda other wise he Trump bashing.
She got careless though ( actually I think it's her typical arrogance?) and used this in front of press as well as her usual sycophantic
fat cat donors.
The fact she's used it several times shows her uber-leftist disdain for the non-elites.
1. Again we agree. lol
2. Like pro-personal responsibility?
3. Yes, it's now out-right socialist.
4. Since it bothers you so much, I'll continue to omit it.
yep. and Hillary is the elite of the elites. At one time Bill Clinton came off as a populist -That was my point. They're called elitists for a reason lol.
It's no different than Obama's 'clingers' comment. The difference is this isn't 2008 or 2012. There's a rebellion against the establishment and the elitists.
So yes, keep it coming Hillary.