Texas Mom Faces Arrest Warrant and $700 Fine for Offering to Sell Homemade Tamales

Timshel

New member
http://ij.org/texas-mom-faces-arrest-warrant-700-fine-offering-sell-homemade-tamales/

When Dennise Cruz checked her mail earlier this month, she found a stunning notice from the Carrollton Municipal Court: a warrant for her arrest. When she contacted a clerk, she learned the warrant was for an attempt to sell tamales without a permit.


Earlier this year, Dennise posted on the social media site Nextdoor to tell her neighbors that she was selling extra homemade tamales. But at least one of her neighbors alerted the authorities. Instead of just ignoring the complaint or informing Dennise that she would need a permit to sell legally, Carrollton took drastic action and mailed her a “warrant arrest notice” and ultimately fined her $700.


“I don’t understand,” Dennise told CBS 11 in an interview. “I would have rather them come to me first if they had any concerns.”


Dennise is not the only victim of culinary criminalization. Last year, the NYPD arrested three women for selling churros without a license. Their contraband churros meant they could face fines as high as $1,000. A few months later, the San Bernardino Police Department took to Twitter to boast about a government crackdown on street vendors selling fruits and flowers.


Somewhat ironically, Texas has some of the better laws in the nation for selling other types of homemade food. Three years ago, Texas greatly expanded its “cottage food” laws, by easing restrictions on selling baked goods. One year after the new law went into effect, the Institute for Justice found more than 1,400 individuals had created their own cottage food businesses, while the environmental health departments for the state’s 25 largest cities and counties “found no complaints regarding foodborne illnesses from a cottage food business.” But that law does not apply to “potentially hazardous” foods, like those with meat, so tamales are not covered by the cottage food law.
 
I asked the voices in my head which represent board regulars for comment...

The Troll and his cat said...
We can't possibly trust these regulations to Texas. We need a Federal Bureau of Tamales and Dennise should be charged with a federal crime.

Grind said...
Who cares? She's poor and Hispanic! Only the rights of rich white people matter!

Taft wondered...
Why can't we send her to Gitmo?

Desh said...
Austrian school is carp (sic)!
 
I don't deny that the state might have some legitimate interest in a permitting process. But the reaction is too heavy handed.

Heavy handed would be waiting for someone to die from salmonella, Listeria, botulinum or E-coli poisoning before market forces put this lady out of business selling unregulated food to an unsuspecting public.
That would be the libertarian approach.
The public has a legitimate interest in a permitting process and regulation of the safety of food vendors. The state is merely their agent.
 
Last edited:
So she's operating without health inspections and insurance. What happens when she makes someone ill?

I'm sure libertarians everywhere would take up a collection for her legal defense fund protecting her right to sell tainted food to an unsuspecting public.
We wouldn't want to be too "heavy handed" on her for selling potentially lethal food.
 
I asked the voices in my head which represent board regulars for comment...

The Troll and his cat said...
We can't possibly trust these regulations to Texas. We need a Federal Bureau of Tamales and Dennise should be charged with a federal crime.

Grind said...
Who cares? She's poor and Hispanic! Only the rights of rich white people matter!

Taft wondered...
Why can't we send her to Gitmo?

Desh said...
Austrian school is carp (sic)!

Did you ask the voices in your libertarian head just what the dollar value should be for a kid killed by food borne salmonella poisoning?
$300? $100? Perhaps a slap on the wrist would be okay?
Let someone die and then she would be out of business from the word of mouth, market forces right? Yeah that's the libertarian solution...
 
Heavy handed would be waiting for someone to die from salmonella, Listeria, botulinum or E-coli poisoning before market forces put this lady out of business selling unregulated food to an unsuspecting public.

Uhhh, no, from some perspectives that might be an example of being too light handed.


That would be the libertarian approach.

That would be A libertarian approach. IOW, it's what some libertarians might suggest.


The public has a legitimate interest in a permitting process and regulation of the safety of food vendors. The state is merely their agent.

Your semantic argument is meaningless. I was using the standard terminology you might find in a court opinion. If you want to use non standard terminology, knock yourself out. It changes nothing of importance, since I know what you really mean is the state.


Did you ask the voices in your libertarian head just what the dollar value should be for a kid killed by food borne salmonella poisoning?
$300? $100? Perhaps a slap on the wrist would be okay?

That would be up to the courts, but, of course, it would likely and should be much higher than that.

Let someone die and then she would be out of business from the word of mouth, market forces right? Yeah that's the libertarian solution...

No, it is not. You don't know what you are talking about. Rothbard (who is way more extreme than I) would have argued that it should be handled through strict liability.

Your response is extremely hyperbolic. If the dangers from her tamales are so great why let her serve them to her family without some sort of permit?

Did you even bother to notice that her arrest warrant was for ATTEMPTING to sell tamales. I am not sure whether she actually sold any though I imagine they would have noted that if it were the case. Still, the state apparently only has knowledge of her attempt to sell tamales.

What about the San Bernadino example of selling fruit and even flowers? How is a flower going to hurt anyone? Such a policy is only there to protect the established businesses and the state's revenues from property taxes. It serves no legitimate PUBLIC (i.e., "state" for those who are not trying to force their newspeak jargon onto others) interest.

What your sort of heavy handed regulations do is foster black markets. If legal avenues to market entry are overly burdensome then people WILL go around the law. Your Trumpian response that we only need a willing state actor or strong man that will punish the rule breakers does not work.
 
Last edited:
What about the San Bernadino example of selling fruit and even flowers?

Foodborne Pathogens Associated with Fresh Fruits and Vegetables


There are a number of foodborne microbial pathogens associated with the consumption of fresh fruits and vegetables that can cause illness or death among consumers who eat contaminated produce.

This document summarizes the major foodborne microbial pathogens that may be found in fresh produce, including Cyclospora cayetanensis, Escherichia coli O157:H7, Hepatitis A, Listeria monocytogenes, Norovirus, Salmonella spp., and Shigella spp.1

Cyclospora: This pathogen is commonly characterized by watery diarrhea, loss of appetite, weight loss, abdominal bloating and cramping, low-grade fever, nausea, vomiting, and fatigue. Contaminated water used for irrigation and pesticide application and poor worker hygiene has been suggested as the most likely causes of contamination. Cyclospora outbreaks have been linked to fresh raspberries, mesclun lettuce, and basil or basil-containing products.

Escherichia coli O157:H7: Most E. coli strains are nonpathogenic (they suppress harmful bacterial growth), and are commonly found in the intestines of all animals, including humans. However, there are a minority of strains such as serotype O157:H7 that may cause human illness. E. coli O157:H7 is a life-threatening bacterium that produces large quantities of potent toxins that can cause severe damage to the lining of the intestines. Human illness associated with E. coli O157:H7 infection may include hemorrhagic colitis, hemolytic uremic syndrome (HUS), or thrombotic thrombocytopenic purpura (TTP). HUS largely affects young children and is the leading cause of acute renal failure in children. E. coli O157:H7 outbreaks have been linked to fresh produce (such as spinach and leafy greens).

Hepatitis A: This virus may cause a serious, and sometimes fatal, disease, characterized by sudden onset of fever, malaise, nausea, anorexia, and abdominal discomfort, followed in several days by jaundice. Hepatitis A outbreaks have been linked to fruits, vegetables, salads and with infected workers in food processing plants.

Listeria monocytogenes: This bacterium causes listeriosis, a serious disease in pregnant women, the elderly, and those with weakened immune systems. Listeriosis is characterized by flu-like symptoms, including persistent fever, and can be accompanied by gastrointestinal symptoms such as nausea, vomiting, and diarrhea. Listeriosis outbreaks have been linked to raw vegetables.

Noroviruses: These are viruses (also known as "Norwalk-like viruses") that cause acute gastroenteritis in humans. Norovirus outbreaks have been linked to contaminated water and salad ingredients.

Salmonella spp.: Typical symptoms of salmonellosis are nausea, vomiting, abdominal cramps, fever, mild diarrhea, and headache. Salmonella outbreaks have been linked to fresh produce.

Shigella spp.: Contamination by this pathogen has often been associated with poor personal hygiene of food workers. Typical symptoms include abdominal pain, cramps, diarrhea, fever, vomiting, and blood, pus, or mucus in stools. Shigellosis outbreaks have been linked to shredded lettuce, potato salad, green onions, and parsley.

http://www.pewtrusts.org/en/research-and-analysis/issue-briefs/2008/11/19/foodborne-pathogens-associated-with-fresh-fruits-and-vegetables
 
Libertarians love to paint everyone who doesn't embrace their insanity with the "statist" brush, don't they?

Hasa Diga Eebowai!

Hakuna Matata!
 
Aleister Crowley must have been a Libertarian.

quote-do-what-thou-wilt-shall-be-the-whole-of-the-law-aleister-crowley-44869.jpg


Hasa Diga Eebowai!

Hakuna Matata!
 
I'm sure libertarians everywhere would take up a collection for her legal defense fund protecting her right to sell tainted food to an unsuspecting public.
We wouldn't want to be too "heavy handed" on her for selling potentially lethal food.
You really are nothing but a troll.

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
 
Government regulations have stopped all citizens from getting food poisoning, haven't they?

Sent from my LG-D631 using Tapatalk
 
Back
Top