Into the Night
Verified User
It does. It is private property, like any other. Private property owners are not part of the government, which is what the Constitution defines.
texas court makes new law out of thin air, negates a right of the people
- Thread starter SmarterthanYou
- Start date
It does. It is private property, like any other. Private property owners are not part of the government, which is what the Constitution defines.
The Constitution was ratified giving judicial power to SCOTUS.
What a fucking cretin.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
You answered your own question, idiot.
Marbury - Judicial Review.
You’re barking up a similar tree as you did with your “vehicles cannot be necessary” in a modern society because they are not mentioned in the BofR.
Still laughing at that one. It remains thd Stupid Post of the Forum. Ever.
your circular logic is creating many knots. the constitution does not allow SCOTUS to usurp power, but you say that SCOTUS is claiming that power by the marbury ruling. its no wonder you're the dumbest fucker here
Into the Night
Verified User
True. A statute must be reasonably specific in scope.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
ah, you're one of those.
You'll have to open a history book first.
but it wouldn't be difficult to take away gun rights the public wants???? is that how it works?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
yet his version didn't make it in to the Bill of Rights, so why is that? we'll wait, moron.
Into the Night
Verified User
The LAW says differently, idiot.
You lose.
Lie.
The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;--to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;--to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;--to controversies between two or more states;--between a state and citizens of another state;--between citizens of different states;--between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.
Another loss for you, idiot. Are we at 20 yet?
Tell us again, stupid fuck, why vehicles cannot be necessary in a modern society. I LOVE your twisted logic on that one!
Into the Night
Verified User
Stand corrected. This also is constitutional under the Texas constitution, since 'calculated to alarm' would be effectively brandishing the weapon.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
if SCOTUS were to rule that guns were now banned, yet we decided to still own and carry, what do you call it when the first jury acquits said individual charged with owning a prohibited firearm????
Fucking constitutional idiot.
see how i'm still beating you about the head and shoulders with your idiocy???
evince
Truthmatters
you and your fucking insane lies don't run this nation you racist cock gobbler
SmarterthanYou
rebel
we acquit people charged with unconstitutional crimes, cuckboy
Into the Night
Verified User
What they are doing is NOT established by the Constitution, idiot.Yeah, FUCK SCOTUS
They are established by the Constitution, idiot.
Fuck SCOTUS.Go ahead and write to them with all your learned legal opinions. I’m sure you’ll be invited to be the 10th justice.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
The Constitution was ratified giving judicial power to SCOTUS.
What a fucking cretin.
no shit, moron. it's why it's called the judiciary.....but NOWHERE in Art 3 does it say that SCOTUS is the ultimate authority on the constitution, does it cuckboy.
evince
Truthmatters
SmarterthanYou
rebel
The judicial power shall extend to all cases, in law and equity, arising under this Constitution, the laws of the United States, and treaties made, or which shall be made, under their authority;--to all cases affecting ambassadors, other public ministers and consuls;--to all cases of admiralty and maritime jurisdiction;--to controversies to which the United States shall be a party;--to controversies between two or more states;--between a state and citizens of another state;--between citizens of different states;--between citizens of the same state claiming lands under grants of different states, and between a state, or the citizens thereof, and foreign states, citizens or subjects.
Another loss for you, idiot. Are we at 20 yet?
Tell us again, stupid fuck, why vehicles cannot be necessary in a modern society. I LOVE your twisted logic on that one!
i see nothing in there about them being the ultimate authority............sorry cuckboy, you got fucked again.
evince
Truthmatters
Im sure it doesn't say YOU are foreskin lips
SmarterthanYou
rebel
does your ass hurt from being kicked bloody with facts, dumbass?
SmarterthanYou
rebel
guess again, cum dumpster. we the people wrote the constitution. that means me. that means you. not the courts.