Terrible news for the Creation Science museum (and Republicans)

[BidenPresident]

More or less what I said.

Then settled.

 

[Darth Omar]

Never heard of it. But, why should I have to explain everything you throw out as a question?

You claimed all science refers to history.

I asked how?

 

[BidenPresident]

You claimed all science refers to history.

I asked how?

All research is based on some other research that happened before. Simple concept. Not profound.

 

[Into the Night]

Genetic variation and genetic mutation are inherent in all species.

Environmentally-favorable genetic mutations are preferentially selected for survival.

Paradox. Which is it, dude?

 

[Into the Night]

You’re familiar with this subject lol?

Such questions as origins of species, and ultimately man, were considered part of philosophy or religion during Darwin’s day. And again, as pointed out already, they considered themselves natural *philosophers*.

And not improperly, in my mind. It’s not *logically* unfair to consider them natural historians because what they come up with is an historical account of nature. That might actually be the most accurate description.

Not possible. Darwin didn't create the Theory of Evolution. He created a theory of natural selection, which builds a paradox.
You can't describe history with a paradox.

 

[Into the Night]

Darwin was not giving a historical account, but the causes for change in species.

He tried to, yes...but it builds a paradox.

 

[BidenPresident]

He tried to, yes...but it builds a paradox.

uh huh paradox reversal triple threat fallacy

 

[Into the Night]

The terms "evolutionist" and "evolutionism" mean it's a belief, a religion.

Quite right. These terms are used to describe believers of the Theory of Evolution.

 

[Into the Night]

That was the simply the mechanism.

Common descent, the fossil record and the rest isn’t an historical account?

What do you call it then?

Fabrication. Speculation. Fossils do not contain genealogical information.

 

[Into the Night]

Officially? They're called biological scientists. There is no belief. Do you believe in theory of computer science? Physics?

Theories of science do not require any religion.

 

[Into the Night]

All science refers to history to some extent. Darwin is not unique.

Darwin never created a theory of science.

 

[BidenPresident]

Darwin never created a theory of science.

Yes. I was referring to someone who asserted that.

 

[Into the Night]

So, if I say I don’t believe in evolution—that’s a meaningless statement?

Evolutionary science is a sub-category of biology, btw.

The Theory of Evolution is not a theory of science. Theories of science in biology do not require any religion...not even the Church of Evolution.

 

[Into the Night]

I think evolution is a basic principle for biology.

Nope. Theories of science in biology do not require any religion.

 

[BidenPresident]

Nope. Theories of science in biology do not require any religion.

I have no idea what you are talking about.

 

[Into the Night]

History is whatever happened before, literally.

So how is describing where the Moon will be in 1 hour's time using Newton's law of motion and Kepler's law, describing what has happened before?

 

[BidenPresident]

So how is describing where the Moon will be in 1 hour's time using Newton's law of motion and Kepler's law, describing what has happened before?

I did not say science only refers to history.

 

[Into the Night]

Not really, evolution is presumed in most research in biology.

No theory of science in biology requires a religion.

 

[Into the Night]

All research is based on some other research that happened before. Simple concept. Not profound.

Science isn't a 'research' or a 'study'. Science is a set of falsifiable theories.

 

[BidenPresident]

No theory of science in biology requires a religion.

I don't know why you keep babbling about religion. I never mentioned religion.