Terrible news for the Creation Science museum (and Republicans)

LOL. I was a Christian who believed in Creationism.

Me too!

Then I went all in with evolution in college. Then I became a lapsed evolutionist once I was exposed to some ‘forbidden literature’ and began to doubt some of the things I learnt.

And now, I’m not sure what I am. But the subject has always fascinated me.
 
Me too!

Then I went all in with evolution in college. Then I became a lapsed evolutionist once I was exposed to some ‘forbidden literature’ and began to doubt some of the things I learnt.

And now, I’m not sure what I am. But the subject has always fascinated me.

The terms "evolutionist" and "evolutionism" mean it's a belief, a religion.
 
Sorry, not sure what the question is. Darwin was trying to describe the mechanism of change in species.

Natural selection acting on random mutations is the pure science: it’s the mechanism.

I’m not sure how you can use the fossil record, as a record in support of a theory, and ‘not’ end up with an historical account.
 
Natural selection acting on random mutations is the pure science: it’s the mechanism.

I’m not sure how you can use the fossil record, as a record in support of a theory, and ‘not’ end up with an historical account.


All science refers to history to some extent. Darwin is not unique.
 
Evolution functions as a kind of ‘back drop’ to most of biology. IOW, it’s not necessary to know it in order to understand osmosis or active transport or mitosis or a thousand other etc’s.

It’s its own discipline.

Not really, evolution is presumed in most research in biology.
 
Back
Top