Terrible news for the Creation Science museum (and Republicans)

[BidenPresident]

So...can't describe a test of the Big Bang theory itself, eh? Though so. When you turn to insulting people, you've lost. You have no further arguments to present.

The fact you literally know nothing about empirical evidence for Big Bang makes you avoidable.

 

[BidenPresident]

So...can't explain how mathematicians deal with infinity, eh? Thought so. Again, when you turn to insults, you've lost. You have no further arguments to present.

duhhh fallacy of insultin' n' stufff double reverse secret fallacy

 

[Into the Night]

And you can be tedious lol.

I know. I do insist on consistency.

The OT most certainly implies that God created the _________ whatever the word is for universe that meets your approval. Creation may be a better word, actually. All that is created was created by God.

Creation is a verb. Created is the same verb in past tense.

So what did God actually create?

Job for example, talks about God ‘stretching out the heavens’. Psalms say ‘the heavens declare the glory of his name’ and etc.

God also describes 'heaven' as part of his kingdom. Stretching out his kingdom to there the Earth is can certainly refer to the creation of Earth by God. Doesn't have to be anything beyond that, though. It is said that God has created worlds without number (a number so large only God knows what it is).

I’m not saying it proves anything or that it’s a scientific theory just that it fits the facts.

The 'fact' I assume you are referring to is the Theory of the Big Bang. Fine. If you want to believe in the Church of the Big Bang, you are welcome to. I don't.

If this were a criminal investigation trying to discover who or what created the creation, the God of the Bible remains ‘a person of interest’.

Is it a crime now to create the Earth?

 

[Micawber]

The resident self appointed logician is defending creationism?

 

[BidenPresident]

The resident self appointed logician is defending creationism? ��

Hard to find a coherent thought in all his gibberish.

 

[Into the Night]

Magical Unicorn dust?

That's only if you believe in magical unicorns.

Energy is a property of matter.

Nope. Energy has no mass.

https://kidskonnect.com/science/matter-energy/

False authority fallacy. Holy Link.

Matter is the substance of which all material is made. That means objects which have mass.

Badly worded, but essentially correct.

Energy is used in science to describe how much potential a physical system has to change.

Again badly worded, but essentially correct.

In physics, energy is a property of matter.

Paradox. You just said the opposite. Which is it, dude?

It can be transferred between objects, and converted in form.

Matter can change form, and also energy can change form.

It cannot be created or destroyed.

Matter and energy cannot be created or destroyed.

But they are not the same thing.

 

[Darth Omar]

And foolish to believe.

I lack the faith to believe in abiogenesis so where else do I turn?

 

[BidenPresident]

I lack the faith to believe in abiogenesis so where else do I turn?

Rationality. But you never tried being rational. So, belief is the best you can do.

 

[Into the Night]

No. Relativity theory showed there is no absolute frame of reference for time or space.

Never said there was. Absolute measurements, however are quite possible.

Basic physics, which you never studied.

No, that would be YOU. Einstein's theory does note that what you call 'zero' when measuring length or speed is strictly of your own choosing. Einstein's model DOES have an absolute speed though. The speed of light.

 

[Darth Omar]

Inversion fallacy. That would be YOU.

Why does the 'thing' where we exist have to have a beginning at all?

On what basis is one excluded lol?

If ever there was a subject that should require an open mind this is it.

 

[BidenPresident]

Never said there was. Absolute measurements, however are quite possible.

No, that would be YOU. Einstein's theory does note that what you call 'zero' when measuring length or speed is strictly of your own choosing. Einstein's model DOES have an absolute speed though. The speed of light.

Double reversal over the head fallacy. Fallacy of the triple reverse.

 

[Darth Omar]

Rationality. But you never tried being rational. So, belief is the best you can do.

Yet you *believe* in abiogenesis.

 

[Into the Night]

Outside of it in a ‘place’ that we cannot comprehend and certainly isn’t explainable in physical terms.

Hint: it’s foolish to try.

Then the universe was not created by God...for God cannot exist outside of the universe. If he did, the universe never existed.

You're still trying to argue your way out of your paradox.

 

[BidenPresident]

Yet you *believe* in abiogenesis.

The universe is stuff. Life is just as much a possibility as black holes. No difference. The organic/inorganic distinction is arbitrary.

 

[Darth Omar]

Then the universe was not created by God...for God cannot exist outside of the universe. If he did, the universe never existed.

You're still trying to argue your way out of your paradox.

The automobile maker can only exist inside of the automobile lol?

 

[Into the Night]

Then why are they locking criminals up?

Because the police either saw them commit a crime, or collected sufficient evidence to convince a jury that the crime took place and the defendant committed the crime.

None of it is science.

 

[Into the Night]

The fact you literally know nothing about empirical evidence for Big Bang makes you avoidable.

There is empirical evidence...the red shift observed in our part of the universe that we can see, for example.
There is, however, no reason to believe our part of the universe is doing the same thing as another part of the universe.

Science does not use supporting evidence. Only religions do that. The Church of the Big Bang is a religion.

 

[BidenPresident]

There is empirical evidence...the red shift observed in our part of the universe that we can see, for example.
There is, however, no reason to believe our part of the universe is doing the same thing as another part of the universe.

Science does not use supporting evidence. Only religions do that. The Church of the Big Bang is a religion.

dumb dumb dumb. You're tiresome.

 

[AProudLefty]

Because the police either saw them commit a crime, or collected sufficient evidence to convince a jury that the crime took place and the defendant committed the crime.

None of it is science.

 

[Into the Night]

The resident self appointed logician is defending creationism?

Why not? For all we know, we could all be the result of a horrible lab experiment gone wrong somewhere, and they dumped it on Earth to get rid of it.
Or it could be an intentional act of some kind of god or gods. The Bible mentions a single God.
Or it might not have happened at all.

Nothing illogical about the Theory of Creation, the Theory of Abiogenesis, the Theory of the Big Bang, the Theory of Evolution, or the Theory of the Continuum. None of them are science. All of them are religions.