Cancel 2018. 3
<-- sched 2, MJ sched 1
Well at least you stopped calling it a 'fetus' and finally have come to terms with the fact that it is indeed an unborn child and have properly referred to the "baby's death".
good one
Well at least you stopped calling it a 'fetus' and finally have come to terms with the fact that it is indeed an unborn child and have properly referred to the "baby's death".
im not making any excuses. She is trying to guilt people using the death of her daughter for political purposes. She's scum, I don't give a shit about her or her ugly stupid daughter.
Wow, you're a hard-hitter, Grind.
hard hitter, yeah man I'm the real deal
reveling in the facts that I reveal
and ya'll can get out of the kitchen
and make your own meal
if you can't stand the heat
and want to retreat
from my verbose witticisms
about the governments teat
Well at least you stopped calling it a 'fetus' and finally have come to terms with the fact that it is indeed an unborn child and have properly referred to the "baby's death".
I have never supported or defended people going over the bounds of decent civil discourse to make a point. I don't believe in violence; I don't believe in shouting people down. I don't think the ends justify the means.
Is that so....???
Where was the outrage when Obama's union thugs beat up conservative protesters on the street?
Where is the outrage about abortion on demand, with tax payer money, at 8 1/2 gestation?
Where was the outrage when liberal protesters called for the death of George Bush with regularity....?
Where was the outrage when your messiahs lawyers failed to bring any charges against the black panthers that threatened and intimidated voters last election..?
Where is the outrage when your messiah appoints his tax evading friends to important policy making positions in Washington?
I could go on forever, but you get the idea hypocrite ?
Huffpo's words, not mine. They are progressives, not liberals, and hold some pretty disgusting beliefs, like the ones you've just voiced.
Conservatives are unworthy of being Americans.
Tea Party Patriots Attack Family Who Lost Daughter And Grandchild (VIDEO)
YouTube- Midge Hough and the Chicago Tea Party Patriots
A group called the Chicago Tea Party Patriots publicly heckled a grieving family and suggested that the couple fabricated their tragic story.
At a town hall held by Rep. Dan Lipinski (D-Ill.) on Nov. 14,, Dan and Midge Hough spoke about how they believed the death of their daughter-in-law and her unborn child were caused, in part, by a lack of health insurance. Twenty-four-year old Jennifer was uninsured. According to her in-laws, she was not receiving regular prenatal care and was not properly treated when she got sick. She ended up in an emergency room with double pneumonia that developed into septic shock, had a heart attack, a brain bleed and a stroke. The baby died and Jennifer died a few weeks later.
Midge Hough was heckled by anti-reform crowd members. "You can laugh at me, that's okay," she said, crying. "But I lost two people, and I know you think that's funny, that's okay."
A local Tea Party organizer falsely claimed that the couple had made up the story and tried to justify the town hall behavior, according to the Southtown Star.Catherina Wojtowicz, of Chicago's Mount Greenwood community, an organizer for a Tea Party splinter group, Chicago Tea Party Patriots, falsely claimed that the Houghs fabricated their story. In an e-mail, she called them operatives of President Barack Obama who "go from event to event and (cry) the same story." [...]
The audience, Wojtowicz later explained, was exasperated by stories of isolated tragedies that cloud debate over the health care bill itself.
Why was a 'grieving' family there?
Who cares?
I don't care if you think it's craven or opportunistic. Isn't anyone's inclination to err on the side of dignity when it comes to someone who is crying?
No. If they are crocodile tears. Which seems to be the case.
So sure, are you? You're pretty positive those were "crocodile tears"?
This thread is pretty unreal.
Not really. The family wanted confrontation, they got it.
so what should they have done....weep for her and then vote for the bill with no discourse? if anyone did laugh, that was uncalled for....but really, she is using an emotional argument, which can't be helped, it is kind of niave to not expect an emotional response
That's a false choice. No one is suggesting they "weep for her" or abandon discourse. A little dignity; some basic manners. It's not asking a lot.
so what should they have done....weep for her and then vote for the bill with no discourse? if anyone did laugh, that was uncalled for....but really, she is using an emotional argument, which can't be helped, it is kind of niave to not expect an emotional response
This is a false choice. Your first line suggests that the only other option besides heckling & ridiculing her would be weeping for her & then voting without discourse.
Clearly, there are other options in this instance.