TEA party terrorists

Damocles said:
Did you ever find a link to that plan you said instantaneously cut 40% of the budget? Didn't think so...
Click to expand...

as I recall, he said they didn't have a plan.....so the plan they didn't have was to cut 40%.....the plan they didn't have was sort of like the argument he didn't have.....
 
PostmodernProphet said:
right....everyone's ears were broken and they were hearing things he didn't say......got it.....
Click to expand...

People often hear what they want to hear and the truth dies somewhere, unless they have it on tape, it is heresay and how far does that go these days? Well, I guess it depends on who you converse with on a regular basis.
 
Rana said:
People often hear what they want to hear and the truth dies somewhere, unless they have it on tape, it is heresay and how far does that go these days? Well, I guess it depends on who you converse with on a regular basis.
Click to expand...

ah, so you aren't denying he said it, you're just saying that under the rules of courtroom evidence they can't convict him of it......
 
Damocles said:
I don't believe that they do, as evidenced by the increased high pitch of the whine about the "targeting" metaphor that the left attempted to blame when Gifford was shot by a lunatic who hadn't paid any attention to any such rhetoric...

I really think the left truly believes these idiotic metaphors and thinks they are reality, I also see a grip of hypocrisy as some of the loudest whiners are the ones with the most insane rhetoric.

I'm good with any rhetoric, because that is what it is. I am not so happy about clear hypocrisy. If you are going to use the rhetoric, don't whine about the rhetoric first then dive into even deeper waters with your own. Basically, before you talk about the splinter in your brother's eye, maybe you should remove that beam in your own...
Click to expand...

Word; DAWG!!
 
christiefan915 said:
Hilarious. Who said "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."?
Click to expand...

But does that change whether the Obama Administration's rhetoric is deplorable or not? Bush got ripped in some quarters for his for or against us talk so should Obama's admin be treated the same way?
 
Alias said:
Say it ain't so, Joe. Looks like ole Joe needs another craniotomy. I suppose most of the young twerps around here don't even know Joe has been caught twice for plagiarism, once in college and once when he ran for President in 1992. Keep talin' Joe. You're pure gold.
Click to expand...

Doyle admitted saying it. Biden denied it. So using the criterion you've set many times, "where's the tape?"
 
:lol:

Sarah Palin: If we were real domestic terrorists, shoot, President Obama would be wanting to pal around with us, wouldn’t he?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top