Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Translation: he can't logically refute what I told his compadre...so he just blows smoke.
Oathers...they're everywhere...like bird droppings!
Supreme Court
- Thread starter NOVA
- Start date
Translation: he can't logically refute what I told his compadre...so he just blows smoke.
Oathers...they're everywhere...like bird droppings!
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Obviously, this idiot didn't read the two threads I started that criticized Obama's policies.Oathers...they're everywhere...like dog manure.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
You voted for Gore? How could you? He's such a pussy.OMG, you STILL can't make 57,000 voters magically get their ballots cast, can you bunky? But hey, if it was YOU that got screwed and Gore won, you'd have just shrugged it off, right?
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Who said I voted for Gore? And I noticed how you dodged my point and didn't answer my question. Oh well, never mind....I didn't expect you would.
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
So you were too much of a pussy to vote for that pussy?
Once again, folks...our intellectually impotent braying jackass that is Bravo displays his unique talent of railing and beating his chest for being totally ass backwards Wrong.
Let me try to dumb it down for the little cretin again: *Ahem* Katherine Harris was the Secretary of State for Florida and Chairwoman for the Bush-Cheney campaign in Florida (who's governor was Jeb Bush, the Shrub's brother) in 2000. Harris was in charge of approving the "scrub" list provided by DBT, a company she okayed to review Florida voting list to remove felons and others legally not eligible to vote. So when it came out that over 57,000 people were wrongfully disenfranchised from the voter list, the US Civil Rights Commission did an investigation. And as I said before, the results were that Harris and the Florida Division of Elections (also under Harris's jurisdiction)were guilty of royally screwing up, the Commission did not find enough evidence to prove criminal intent (willfully and knowingly disenfranchising voters).
This is all public record...so will someone please get an adult to explain it all to Bravo, so he won't make a fool of himself next time.
US Civil Rights Commission did an investigation
and found ????????????
NOTHING ILLEGAL...Harris did her job according to law..the issue is DEAD...
Its OVER...its AN OLD STALE SUBJECT..
GET THE FUCK OVER IT FOOL.........MOVE ON....
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Not to mention several prominent left-leaning newspapers did their own re-counts and found out that GORE LOST.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Some of us remember what the First Amendment means to the nation so let me refresh your memory.
Abraham Lincoln: "...the nation must be able to protect itself in war against utterances which actually cause insubordination."
Chief Justice Edward D. White: "I don't think your statement has anything to do with legal arguments and should not have been said in this Court. It is a very unpatriotic statement to make." (1917)
The Sedition Act (1918) prohibited the uttering, writing or publishing of anything disloyal to the government, flag or military forces of the United States.
Schenck v. United States (1919) "clear and present danger"
Abrams v. United States (1919) "bad tendency test"
Kovacs v. Cooper (1949) Frankfurter wants the Court to balance, on a case-by-case basis, the individual's free speech claim against the government's reason for regulating behaviour, and stated the government's claim should be taken more seriously.
United States v. O'Brien (1968) Burning draft card (symbolic speech) not protected.
Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire (1942) "fighting words" not protected.
Etc., etc.
Some forms of "free speech" have actually been restricted over the centuries in this nation. Just admit your gripe is against Kagan. You probably applauded the draft card decision.
USFREEDOM911
MAKE AMERICA GREAT AGAIN
Ice-T "Shut the fuck up, bitch."
SmarterthanYou
rebel
are you kidding me? you're actually deigning to support these bullshit opinions in favor of a nominee with the same flavor simply because of Obama?
christiefan915
Catalyst
Support??? Good God, they're reprehensible.
Bravo claims Kagan doesn't understand the First Amendment, yet she hasn't even argued a free speech case. I was pointing out that the country has a history of bullshit opinions and that it was pretty nervy of him to damn Kagan just on supposition. At least listen to the hearings before condemning her.
OK...that sounds fair...and above all else, I'm fair.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
yay, a redeeming quality for you. i was worried.
I'm not condemning her for first amendment issues, I'm condemning her for her propensity to stretch and/or exceed the constitution in favor of expanded executive power.
Minister of Truth
Practically Perfect
Nomination hearings are bullshit, and you can learn very little about the justice from them. You're pretty much better off reading her old articles and suppositions...
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Imbecile! How many times did I tell YOU that Harris was investigated and NOT found guilty of criminal intent, but instead found guilty of gross incompetence! Now you come along railing about a MOOT point.
Go over the chronology of the post, you blithering idiot. YOU stated that there was NO investigation at all! THAT was the point I had to educate you about....the chronology of the posts bares witness to this. As I said to Southy, if it were YOU that was screwed out of your vote and the opposition won, would you be so accepting without protest? To date, no honest answer. Hell, some -of you wingnuts are STILL bitching about the Civil War...so I seriously question you'd be such an accepting victim of voter disenfranchisement.
Get it together, Bravo!
Last edited:
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Really? And how did they do this with over 57,000 disenfranchised voters in the key state of Florida?
Come, come Southy, answer the question: would YOU be so accepting if it was YOU screwed out of your vote and Gore had one?
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
You'll need to provide details of your foolishness before I can comment and slice it apart like a hot knife through butter. I don't have a clue on your conspiracy theory.
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
Translation: Southy makes a statement like it's a matter of fact. I challenge him on it, and he tries to bluff his way out of admitting that The Southern Man is just blowing smoke once again.
Since Southy was giving an appropo to Bravo's BS, the only way he would not have read my response to him was if purposely skipped over it.
The chronology of the posts backs me up on this...but Southy will lie and deny, and avoid a simple burden of proof of his claims by trying to make it seem I'm responsbile for his research.
Last edited:
DamnYankee
Loyal to the end
Provide your details then Libbie. Do you again want me to guess at your position?
Taichiliberal
Shaken, not stirred!
You're full of it as usual Southy....The Southern Man is an intellectual coward...as the chronology of the posts shows. The question still stands...if it were Southy who was a victim of voter disenfranchisement in 2000 and Gore had one, would he be so acquiesent and complacent with that result?