Supreme Court

Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Once again, you keep trying to pass your opinion, supposition and conjecture off as fact and logic.
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
How ironic.
Click to expand...

There you have it folks....everytime some neocon numbskull gets his ideological ass kicked, Southy runs in with an out of context quote and some bogus accusation. When Southy can't logically or factually debate an issue, this is what he does best. :palm:
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
:
Yeah, it took them OVER A YEAR to take to the streets and scream the stupidity they do now.....I guess they had to wait for Dick Armey to clear those "Freedomworks" checks. So either the teabaggers are slow to burn or are full of it.

eek: "Socialist Policy?!!??" Once again Damo, for someone who is constantly swearing that he's NOT a neocon, you sure as hell adhere to the Rovian rhetoric from 2000-2008! And then you throw in some Libertarian malarky for good measure. Don't waste my time with this teabagging bullshit.

Bottom line: The Shrub & company gave out "public assistance" checks to the American populace. This wasn't based on actual individual taxes, it was a GENERALIZED DISTRIBUTION TO A PORTION OF SOCIETY. Some folks got back MORE than what they paid out in the previous year....and People PAID THEIR BILLS, and DID NOT run out to the department stores...so much for "stimulus". So stop making EXCUSES for the Shrub and his neocon buddies when they use socialist methods to prop up their bogus ideology/legacy.
Click to expand...

Damocles said:
It didn't take "over a year", the first of the protests (the one y'all made fun of because supposedly they were small when well over a million showed up across the US) happened on April 15th the next year. At that time I said that it was a decent start and hoped it would grow.

I stand corrected....so it took 1 YEAR for the dummies to get riled up enough for the protests? Wow...that really takes the teeth out of my previous statement! :palm:

Bottom line, Bush and CO gave people back money they paid in taxes. If you hadn't paid you didn't get the money back (that was part of what y'all complained about, some people who were poor got no checks at all). Getting your own money back isn't "bad" or "socialism" even in the mind of the left.
Click to expand...


Bottom line: you're just repeating yourself without addressing the points I made previously. Typical of the neocon punditry when their ideology doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
 
Taichiliberal said:
There you have it folks....everytime some neocon numbskull gets his ideological ass kicked, Southy runs in with an out of context quote and some bogus accusation. When Southy can't logically or factually debate an issue, this is what he does best. :palm:
Click to expand...
I'm constantly amazed at how you do exactly what you accuse me of.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
There you have it folks....everytime some neocon numbskull gets his ideological ass kicked, Southy runs in with an out of context quote and some bogus accusation. When Southy can't logically or factually debate an issue, this is what he does best.
Click to expand...

Southern Man said:
I'm constantly amazed at how you do exactly what you accuse me of.
Click to expand...

What's amazing is that the chronology of the posts constantly proves you to be a liar....Now, say something stupid or do EXACTLY what I said you would....you're pathetic, Southy. Maybe that buffoon Freedumb will chime in with some supportive, like minded idiocy to make you feel better.

Say goodnight, gracie.
 
Taichiliberal said:
:palm: Since when is it the letter of the law to use a flawed voter scrub list? Especially after the company you hired to run said list TELLS you that it's flawed?

The best that could be proved was that Harris fucked up royally...but for some inexplicable reason they couldn't prove she INTENTIONALLY fucked up.

Got that bunky? Let me know when YOU actually win one outside of your delusional view of the world.
Click to expand...

You really should leave well enough alone instead of making a complete ass of yourself....Harris never was accused, let alone tried of any wrong doing...just because a peckerhead like you implies otherwise doesn't make it so....the bottom line is ...SHE DID NOTHING WRONG LET ALONE ILLEGAL....and thats what you narrow-minded peckerheads can't accept even years later........

Get over it, already...its what making your fuckin' brain rot....

Now, come on....get close...just close, and I'll let you win one....I'm in a charitable mood....
 
bravo said:
You really should leave well enough alone instead of making a complete ass of yourself....Harris never was accused, let alone tried of any wrong doing...just because a peckerhead like you implies otherwise doesn't make it so....the bottom line is ...SHE DID NOTHING WRONG LET ALONE ILLEGAL....and thats what you narrow-minded peckerheads can't accept even years later........

Get over it, already...its what making your fuckin' brain rot....

Now, come on....get close...just close, and I'll let you win one....I'm in a charitable mood....
Click to expand...
OMG He's on the 'Bush stole the election' thing again? :palm:
 
Taichiliberal said:
Newflash for ya, toodles....."legal precedent" can and has been applied to all types of court decisions. "legal precedent" refers to a previous court decision that can be applied to a current case for justification of a procedure used by cousel.
Click to expand...

not a very observant depiction of reality though. sure, legal precedent SHOULD be applied to everyone fairly, but you're a certified moronic dipshit retard if you think you get the same objective justice as an agent of the state does.
 
Taichiliberal said:
What's truly sad is that YOU cannot logically or factually refute or disprove what I schooled that idiot Bravo on, or how I took the wind out of Damo's sails while factually pointing out the rhetoric he parrots yet claims he abhors.

Blather on, my intellectually bankrupt clown.
Click to expand...

pulling shit out of your ass is not providing factual information or data.
 
Taichiliberal said:
Says the man who depends more on cartoons than facts and logic.

I noticed you dummied up when I schooled you on your blatherings about socialism....and Damo pretty much did the same dumb thing you did in trying to excuse and detract from a historical fact. Both of you are guilty of being hypocrits.

You're such a preposterous figure, Bravo....carry on.
Click to expand...

This just might work....In place or you actually winning a debate, when the entertainment for me wears thin, and fatigue sets in and I just decide to ignore your tedious and boring bullshit retorts....you can claim you pwned me....

You can rant about neocon this and neocon that...how I'm "willfully ignorant", and the all important "chronology of the posts" proves you're right. etc.....

That way your ego can remain intact and your life in this alternate world of yours, in which you imagine yourself cleaver, can continue...and of course my guilt for exposing you as an asshole and peckerheaded fool will not cause me any more undo anxiety....

and...I won't have to "let you win one" just for fun....I'll just ignore you for a few posts and you can say..."I noticed you dummied up when I schooled you on your blatherings about ...whatever...."

Yes...I think this will work....of course, other readers following the thread won't be fooled, you'll still be an asshole peckerhead to them..
 
Last edited:
good ole taichi, him and desh are two of the most diehard believers of Obama there is. Obama could flat out tell them he hates america and they'd say, he said it because he's a patriot.
 
SmarterThanYou said:
good ole taichi, him and desh are two of the most diehard believers of Obama there is. Obama could flat out tell them he hates america and they'd say, he said it because he's a patriot.
Click to expand...

i think it is because he has a D after his name....it doesn't matter if it is obama or osama...as long as both have a D after their name, both will defend to the end
 
bravo said:
This just might work....In place or you actually winning a debate, when the entertainment for me wears thin, and fatigue sets in and I just decide to ignore your tedious and boring bullshit retorts....you can claim you pwned me....

You can rant about neocon this and neocon that...how I'm "willfully ignorant", and the all important "chronology of the posts" proves you're right. etc.....

That way your ego can remain intact and your life in this alternate world of yours, in which you imagine yourself cleaver, can continue...and of course my guilt for exposing you as an asshole and peckerheaded fool will not cause me any more undo anxiety....

and...I won't have to "let you win one" just for fun....I'll just ignore you for a few posts and you can say..."I noticed you dummied up when I schooled you on your blatherings about ...whatever...."

Yes...I think this will work....of course, other readers following the thread won't be fooled, you'll still be an asshole peckerhead to them..
Click to expand...
.
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Since when is it the letter of the law to use a flawed voter scrub list? Especially after the company you hired to run said list TELLS you that it's flawed?

The best that could be proved was that Harris fucked up royally...but for some inexplicable reason they couldn't prove she INTENTIONALLY fucked up.

Got that bunky? Let me know when YOU actually win one outside of your delusional view of the world.
Click to expand...

bravo said:
You really should leave well enough alone instead of making a complete ass of yourself....Harris never was accused, let alone tried of any wrong doing...just because a peckerhead like you implies otherwise doesn't make it so....the bottom line is ...SHE DID NOTHING WRONG LET ALONE ILLEGAL....and thats what you narrow-minded peckerheads can't accept even years later........

Get over it, already...its what making your fuckin' brain rot....

Now, come on....get close...just close, and I'll let you win one....I'm in a charitable mood....
Click to expand...


Once again, folks...our intellectually impotent braying jackass that is Bravo displays his unique talent of railing and beating his chest for being totally ass backwards Wrong.

Let me try to dumb it down for the little cretin again: *Ahem* Katherine Harris was the Secretary of State for Florida and Chairwoman for the Bush-Cheney campaign in Florida (who's governor was Jeb Bush, the Shrub's brother) in 2000. Harris was in charge of approving the "scrub" list provided by DBT, a company she okayed to review Florida voting list to remove felons and others legally not eligible to vote. So when it came out that over 57,000 people were wrongfully disenfranchised from the voter list, the US Civil Rights Commission did an investigation. And as I said before, the results were that Harris and the Florida Division of Elections (also under Harris's jurisdiction)were guilty of royally screwing up, the Commission did not find enough evidence to prove criminal intent (willfully and knowingly disenfranchising voters).

This is all public record...so will someone please get an adult to explain it all to Bravo, so he won't make a fool of himself next time. :palm:
 
bravo said:
This just might work....In place or you actually winning a debate, when the entertainment for me wears thin, and fatigue sets in and I just decide to ignore your tedious and boring bullshit retorts....you can claim you pwned me....

You can rant about neocon this and neocon that...how I'm "willfully ignorant", and the all important "chronology of the posts" proves you're right. etc.....

That way your ego can remain intact and your life in this alternate world of yours, in which you imagine yourself cleaver, can continue...and of course my guilt for exposing you as an asshole and peckerheaded fool will not cause me any more undo anxiety....

and...I won't have to "let you win one" just for fun....I'll just ignore you for a few posts and you can say..."I noticed you dummied up when I schooled you on your blatherings about ...whatever...."

Yes...I think this will work....of course, other readers following the thread won't be fooled, you'll still be an asshole peckerhead to them..
Click to expand...


I just love to watch this dumb bunny blather on!

Chronology of the posts ....a phrase that annoys Bravo so much because it refers to the FACTS of the ACTUAL PROGRESSION OF THE DISCUSSION....this is detrimental to Bravo's self aggrandizing diatribes, because when faced with his own words and how they fail against contrary information, Bravo's veneer of intellectual discourse crumbles, and he either spits venom or blathers like he does here.

Witness here how I have to school him on yet another point of information that he is ignorant of (yet quite vocal about):

http://www.justplainpolitics.com/showpost.php?p=650988&postcount=75

While Bravo rants own about "pwned" and pinheads or clarabells or peckerheads, the truth is he's just not that up on current events or capable of critical thinking beyond a low level. I almost pity Bravo...almost.
 
Taichiliberal said:
I stand corrected....so it took 1 YEAR for the dummies to get riled up enough for the protests? Wow...that really takes the teeth out of my previous statement!
Click to expand...

Apparently, you cannot count. The law passed six months before the first protest which was done on Tax day, not because they didn't exist, but to make a point.

Bottom line: you're just repeating yourself without addressing the points I made previously. Typical of the neocon punditry when their ideology doesn't stand up to scrutiny.
Click to expand...

Just giving you the facts, Jack. The reality is, the checks were given to people who payed taxes, not to those who did not. It was one of the things so many on the left complained about. While you can rewrite history in your own head, reality doesn't change at the same time, you ain't Odin...
 
Originally Posted by Taichiliberal
Newflash for ya, toodles....."legal precedent" can and has been applied to all types of court decisions. "legal precedent" refers to a previous court decision that can be applied to a current case for justification of a procedure used by cousel.
Click to expand...

SmarterThanYou said:
not a very observant depiction of reality though. sure, legal precedent SHOULD be applied to everyone fairly, but you're a certified moronic dipshit retard if you think you get the same objective justice as an agent of the state does.
Click to expand...

:palm: No one asked you to repeat your OPINION, you silly oather....because your opinion is irrelevent to the discussion at hand...YOU and anyone who thinks that a legal precedent is reserved for "an agent of the state" obviously have never followed any court cases in the media on any level...or observed an active court room for that matter.

Remember, my intellectually bankrupt oather, I said it CAN be used in ALL types of court room decisions. And as a matter of fact and history, it HAS BEEN.


Yeah, an oather who warns, "We are everywhere"....just like dog manure.
 
Damocles said:
Apparently, you cannot count. The law passed six months before the first protest which was done on Tax day, not because they didn't exist, but to make a point.

:palm: Think back....February 2008 was when the Shrub signed off on the stimulus package. Get it now, genius? Like I said, the Teabaggers are either slow to burn, fucking stupid or full of it when it comes to their "outrage".

Just giving you the facts, Jack. The reality is, the checks were given to people who payed taxes, not to those who did not. It was one of the things so many on the left complained about. While you can rewrite history in your own head, reality doesn't change at the same time, you ain't Odin...
Click to expand...

Since when is your opinion, supposition or conjecture "fact"? The reality is that there were people who got back more in the stimulus than they paid out in taxes the previous year. I've got neighbors and friends and coworkers to attest to that. I didn't here a peep of protest from Dem or GOP about it...did you?

So you can tell yourself whatever fantasy you want...the REALITY is that the Shrub & company engaged in a form of gov't "public assistance"..and the so-called conservatives against socialism took it as if butter wouldn't melt in their mouths. Deal with it, "jack".
 
Last edited:
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top