floridafan
Verified User
Only the Congress can make changes to immigration law.
The change to DACA was done by Obama by an E.O. Not legal.
Can you give us a link to where we can find that assumption of yours?
Only the Congress can make changes to immigration law.
The change to DACA was done by Obama by an E.O. Not legal.
Allow me to help you with your confusion...again, Jacky.
The E.O. eliminating Obama's illegal DACA E.O will be refiled with the required procedural matters such as publication in the Congressional Record etc.
My esposa agrees with me. DACA's are illegals brought here illegally.
You do believe in the rule of law, Jacky.
That is not the American citizens problem!
Nomad:
“Of course, had the court decided the other way and backed Trump, you'd both be strutting around with your tits sticking straight up, shouting "Rah-rah-rah!!! Hooray for the all powerful SCOTUS!!!" like a couple of drum majorettes.”
Buy an eighth grade grammar book, cabron.
Multiple punctuation is a no no, you illiterate cabron.
The first word of a sentence must be in the upper case, you illiterate cabron.
No outrage here, Mujer de Buho.
“We do not decide whether DACA or its rescission are sound policies," Roberts wrote in the majority opinion. "'The wisdom' of those decisions 'is none of our concern.' We address only whether the agency complied with the procedural requirement that it provide a reasoned explanation for its action."
There was no ruling on DACA, just the procedure .
A procedural matter...easily corrected.
Trump loses again. Roberts writes the majority opinion. DACA continues. Sorry xenophobes.
SCOTUS has long not been a court of law, it is an unelected political body, one that consistently refuses to defend the Constitution....its main job.
When have I ever said I was "thrilled"? I don't care who said what, but deciding that allowing people who are NOT American citizens to break our laws and stay here is ludicrous.
Why can't they go back where they came from and get in line and apply for American citizenship. Lots of respectful immigrants do.
They came here as children. Don't be an asshole just because you're racist as fuck.
I don't care where they came from, you pathetic communist hypocrite, send them back, they aren't American citizens. Someone else can support them.
Someone else can support them.
Just how do you, with zero legal background, know this?
True, but unfortunately Roberts is the firewall. I preferred Kennedy in that role, but it's good to know that at least some of the justices take their jobs seriously.
Tell ya what, since you live in a rural area that gets far more spending than you pay in taxes, we cut off your support and give it to them instead.
Like seriously, you screech about supporting DREAMers while sucking up so much federal welfare because your shitty rural area is a tax revenue black hole.
Our township is doing fine financially. Our roads are well maintained, as are our farms and homes. We get very little, if any federal money except for our volunteer fire departments.
The role of the Judicial Branch is to interpret the law.
you realze the decision states the Trump administration is free to reissue the order with a more specific reason, right?.......
Quote Originally Posted by LV426 View Post
Tell ya what, since you live in a rural area that gets far more spending than you pay in taxes, we cut off your support and give it to them instead.
Are you trying to bullshit me, or yourself?I read the S.C. decision and it did not address the legality of DACA, just the procedures by the E.O., to rescind it.
The inclusion of illegals under DACA, that brought children here illegally by Obama will be rescinded.
Illegals are illegal.
Deport, it is the law.