Geeko Sportivo
Verified User
see separation of powers.
your impeachments failed.
you're done.
you've been done for a couple years now.
See you in ROEvember- retard!
see separation of powers.
your impeachments failed.
you're done.
you've been done for a couple years now.
Yup, they tried to schedule it at the time it would most damage a campaign. Then they cry about the speed at which the SCOTUS is hearing things because it ruins their plans. Folks are going to vote to decide who lives in the White House rather than courts deciding it, democrats should run on what you plan on doing rather than trying to continue the lawfare approach.
He can... He will... and HE MUST PREVAIL! Together we will make america GREAT AGAIN! All Heil MAGA!
![]()
And when it's your turn to be in the courts, and you know it will happen, you will be glad for their deliberative speed. We get our day in court, as you said earlier in this thread, you must trust the system. In these cases they seem to be moving at a rate that considers the timing. I get that you don't like it now, but you know for a fact you will when it is your turn in these courts. They dragged their feet until the last minute for Gore, allowing them time to continue counting in the hopes they would "find' enough votes, and you didn't complain about that one...
The time is quicker than most hearings and decisions because they realize that the election is coming up. I get that you don't like their pace and you wish they'd just agree with you now without deliberation or hearings... but, thankfully for Americans, that isn't how this works.
Yup, they tried to schedule it at the time it would most damage a campaign. Then they cry about the speed at which the SCOTUS is hearing things because it ruins their plans. Folks are going to vote to decide who lives in the White House rather than courts deciding it, democrats should run on what you plan on doing rather than trying to continue the lawfare approach.
I'm not a constitutional law scholar.
it's reflected in our legal system in presidents being impeached instead of tried criminally.
it's called the separation of powers.
You do not know what Seperations of Powers means as it is not a shield.
if it was Congress would not be able to Impeach the POTUS (The Executive) as they are separate branches with seperate powers.
it also would mean the DOJ could not charge anyone in Congress as the Executive and Legislative branch are separate each with their own powers.
Separation of Powers means one house has powers distinct to itself, which is accurate and true. It in no way says it is a shield.
What you need to read up on is Checks and Balances, which were deliberately built in by the Framers such that the Each House (Executive, Legislative, Judicial) COULD be held to account by the one or more of the other ones.
What the Founders feared was one branch being corrupted and becoming tyrannical and making sure the others had means to check it and stop it.
right.
and it's congress that can impeach the prezident.
not the judiciary.
know the constitution dipshit.
As i said moron, Separation of Powers is not a shield. You simply do not understand the constitution.
Also impeachment is simply a political act and not one that adjudicates criminality. As the HOuse just showed you can impeach someone for no legit reason if you simply have the votes, when no legal action could ever be taken.
The two ARE NOT connected or dependent on one another. For instances other offices such as appointed Judges also have to be impeached to get them out, but they are charged criminally all the time when not impeached as the law is not dependent on impeachment first.
As i said moron, Separation of Powers is not a shield. You simply do not understand the constitution.
Also impeachment is simply a political act and not one that adjudicates criminality. As the HOuse just showed you can impeach someone for no legit reason if you simply have the votes, when no legal action could ever be taken.
The two ARE NOT connected or dependent on one another. For instances other offices such as appointed Judges also have to be impeached to get them out, but they are charged criminally all the time when not impeached as the law is not dependent on impeachment first.
wrong fucktoid.
to criminally prosecute a president he must be impeached first.
this is to prevent lawfare.
you people are precisely the reason the rule is in place.
And yet you will never bet on that as NO ONE but dunce Trump believes that and the SC certainly will not affirm that.
i would account bet and self ban myself forever from this site versus you giving me control of your Av and Sig for 3 months if you want to actually stand behind what you say, but we know you will not.
I simply see that the slow walking is an attempt to prevent Trump from having a trial before the election, I wonder why that is his goal?
In Bush v. Gore they worked much faster.
lets lower the stakes.
the supreme court will affirm my position and if i am right you must eat poop, on the honor system.
I will say, " did you eat it?"
you will say yes.
YOu are stupid beyond comprehension. I pity your family who i know must dismiss and laugh at you.