Support an Independent Palestine? Sign petition now!

Are you really - and I mean really - that insanely dumb?

I'm not setting restrictions. I'm not declaring anyone a Christian who doesn't declare themselves a Christian. I'm supporting their right to call themselves a Christian, even if they don't believe EXACTLY what Dixie believes.

Dixie, on the other hand, is saying this: you HAVE to believe this, or you are NOT a Christian.

Inclusive vs. exclusive. You're a complete fool if you can't understand the distinction. The fact that you're trying to equate equivalency is absurd.

i'm a liberal democrat
 
i'm a liberal democrat

Who creates strawmen.

There has to be something to do w/ Christ and what Christ's message was in the belief system. It is, after all, CHRISTianity.

But, there are a variety of sources for that. Dixie is saying no - you have to believe the Bible word-for-word, or you're not a Christian, no matter what.

I'm not "designating" anyone a Christian who doesn't already call themselves a Christian & believe in Christ in some way. Obviously, if someone worships the devil or something & calls themselves a "Christian," that pronouncement deserves some scrutiny. But you have to go to some extremes, as you did above, to get there. Try to discuss the topic honestly, instead.
 
There are Christians who are NT only, like it or not. And there are those who DO think Christ meant to abolish the OT, but Paul - who is responsible for much of the NT - didn't agree. You CAN ignore the OT and still be a Christian. Who are you to make the rules on what constitutes a "Christian," and what doesn't? What does the OT have to do with Christ?

And you can believe that God wrote the commandments on a tablet. I don't.



The Church, since its birth has subscribed to the whole council and history of God- as taught and instructed from bot the OT and NT. Any and all sects, that arise and deny this in any way, are considered heretical.
 
The Church, since its birth has subscribed to the whole council and history of God- as taught and instructed from bot the OT and NT. Any and all sects, that arise and deny this in any way, are considered heretical.

There are many sects & groups under the umbrella of Christianity. If any are heretical, it's because a "church" declares them to be; not Christ or God.

Do you believe that anyone who doesn't take a literal interpretation of the OT & NT, and believe every word written, cannot be a Christian?
 
Who creates strawmen.

There has to be something to do w/ Christ and what Christ's message was in the belief system. It is, after all, CHRISTianity.

But, there are a variety of sources for that. Dixie is saying no - you have to believe the Bible word-for-word, or you're not a Christian, no matter what.

I'm not "designating" anyone a Christian who doesn't already call themselves a Christian & believe in Christ in some way. Obviously, if someone worships the devil or something & calls themselves a "Christian," that pronouncement deserves some scrutiny. But you have to go to some extremes, as you did above, to get there. Try to discuss the topic honestly, instead.

how is my statement a strawman? are you saying i'm not a liberal democrat? who are you to say that?

and here you are setting your OWN RULES by saying if they worship the devil, then (tapdance time) then that deserves scrutiny. you're making your OWN RULES, exactly what you accused dixie of doing. who are you say they aren't christian?

:palm:
 
and of course you have to get dishonest again. i never said there was no difference in inclusive vs. exclusive. i claimed it is irrelevant you ignorant tool. you haven't read much of anything i said today correctly.


i don't care about your squabble with dixie. what is laughable is that you think you can declare someone a christian, but someone else cannot declare them non christian. you're a huge moron and what is worse is that you try and justify it by babbling about inclusive vs. exclusive. both positions believe they have the right to say who someone is. you think you have the right to say this person is a christian, but you don't want that power for anyone else.

tff

Wow, you are just so....wrong.
 
how is my statement a strawman? are you saying i'm not a liberal democrat? who are you to say that?

and here you are setting your OWN RULES by saying if they worship the devil, then (tapdance time) then that deserves scrutiny. you're making your OWN RULES, exactly what you accused dixie of doing. who are you say they aren't christian?

:palm:

If you don't read anything I write, why do I respond to you?

It's an interesting conundrum. I'll take your response above as acknowledgment that you finally understand the difference between Dixie's exclusion & my inclusion.
 
If you don't read anything I write, why do I respond to you?

It's an interesting conundrum. I'll take your response above as acknowledgment that you finally understand the difference between Dixie's exclusion & my inclusion.

i'm a liberal democrat. what do you think about that?

and you accuse me of not reading what you write. that is pretty much all you've done today in this thread. and here you are doing it again by completely ignoring that you're making your own rules and being exclusive. you're saying they deserve scrutiny, iow, they are probably not christian. you're doing exactly what you claim dixie can't do.

idiot
 
I get in these discussions with Yurt sometimes, where it just floors me how he tries to create equivalency where none exists. All because Dixie's on the right, even though he's insane.

has nothing to do with dixie. has nothing to do with his political leanings.

care to spread more lies?
 
i'm a liberal democrat. what do you think about that?

and you accuse me of not reading what you write. that is pretty much all you've done today in this thread. and here you are doing it again by completely ignoring that you're making your own rules and being exclusive. you're saying they deserve scrutiny, iow, they are probably not christian. you're doing exactly what you claim dixie can't do.

idiot

I'm not "making rules". That's what you're missing. Dixie IS. Dixie is saying, if you don't believe as I do, you can't call yourself a Christian.

And you're trying to equate that to my defending the right of someone who doesn't believe exactly as Dixie does to call themselves a Christian.

Just take a minute. Forget that it's Onceler writing the above. Think about it.
 
has nothing to do with dixie. has nothing to do with his political leanings.

care to spread more lies?

Then why are you ignoring his infinitely more rigid statements about Christianity? Do you agree with him, or not?

Do you agree with ID? Is someone a heretic if they don't believe as one church tells them to? Are Protestants not Christians?

Try to use your head. This isn't a right or left issue.
 
I'm not "making rules". That's what you're missing. Dixie IS. Dixie is saying, if you don't believe as I do, you can't call yourself a Christian.

And you're trying to equate that to my defending the right of someone who doesn't believe exactly as Dixie does to call themselves a Christian.

Just take a minute. Forget that it's Onceler writing the above. Think about it.

really? then what do you call giving scrutiny to those who worship the devil? you're doing EXACTLY what dixie is doing.

but since you never admit you're wrong, you will dig in your heals and continue this nonsense and make a fool out of yourself.
 
Then why are you ignoring his infinitely more rigid statements about Christianity? Do you agree with him, or not?

Do you agree with ID? Is someone a heretic if they don't believe as one church tells them to? Are Protestants not Christians?

Try to use your head. This isn't a right or left issue.

i don't care about his statements, the issue is YOUR statements. nice deflection though. shows you know your argument is weak and you have to deflect onto others.

you've proven you're intellectually dishonest on this issue.
 
really? then what do you call giving scrutiny to those who worship the devil? you're doing EXACTLY what dixie is doing.

but since you never admit you're wrong, you will dig in your heals and continue this nonsense and make a fool out of yourself.

I'm being extraordinarily patient with you. As I said, you have to go to way-out extremes to prove whatever point you're trying to make.

I'm not doing anything close to what Dixie is doing. I'm not setting up restrictions on what the criteria are to be a Christian based on my own rigid, singular belief system. I'm respecting the rights of others.

It's amazing that you think what I'm doing is the "exact same" as Dixie. It's like you're attempt to compare Libya to Iraq. Ideological, but not logical.
 
i don't care about his statements, the issue is YOUR statements. nice deflection though. shows you know your argument is weak and you have to deflect onto others.

you've proven you're intellectually dishonest on this issue.

I'm being completely honest on this issue. You're being very obtuse though.
 
I'm being extraordinarily patient with you. As I said, you have to go to way-out extremes to prove whatever point you're trying to make.

I'm not doing anything close to what Dixie is doing. I'm not setting up restrictions on what the criteria are to be a Christian based on my own rigid, singular belief system. I'm respecting the rights of others.

It's amazing that you think what I'm doing is the "exact same" as Dixie. It's like you're attempt to compare Libya to Iraq. Ideological, but not logical.

so those who worship the devil can call themselves christian? you said they deserved scrutiny.

that is exactly what dixie is doing. saying that based on their beliefs, they are not christian. you are saying the same thing, although you're tapdancing around it.
 
I'm being completely honest on this issue. You're being very obtuse though.

you just don't like it when your shit gets thrown back in your face. and you're not being honest. you can make rules on who is or is not a christian based on their belief in the devil, but dixie cannot make the same rules based on some other belief. you are dishonest because you refuse to admit this.

carry on
 
Back
Top