My point in that thread was that the Russia Tax Cut you support didn't deliver on the promises of growing the market you people made of it back in December 2017. So holding your feet to that fire, you screeched some incomprehensible nonsense about the Fed being to blame for 2018's poor market, and not the tax cuts that caused a sugar high in Q1 and Q2, and a sugar crash in Q3 and Q4. Now, we're right back to where we started...an entire year wasted because of your shitty tax policy.
Suicide and Trumpism
- Thread starter Oneuli
- Start date
My point in that thread was that the Russia Tax Cut you support didn't deliver on the promises of growing the market you people made of it back in December 2017. So holding your feet to that fire, you screeched some incomprehensible nonsense about the Fed being to blame for 2018's poor market, and not the tax cuts that caused a sugar high in Q1 and Q2, and a sugar crash in Q3 and Q4. Now, we're right back to where we started...an entire year wasted because of your shitty tax policy.
cawacko
Well-known member
Nope. Once again you flat out lie. You have no idea what the Fed does and you lie.
cawacko
Well-known member
LOL, so you want to build a bunch of modern Cabrini Greens? Move out of the ‘50’s tough guy.
cawacko
Well-known member
You have no idea what you are talking about or what the Fed does. None. It’s why you continually avoid it.
Don't Dunning-Kruger your way through this debate.
My point was always the same, you chose to invoke the Fed to explain why the market didn't grow at all in 2018. You think they had something to do with it, but all the earnings reports from Q3 and Q4 shit all over that thought. Just as I predicted in December 2017, we would see high earnings in Q1 and Q2 that wouldn't be matched in Q3 and Q4...so earnings didn't meet the same growth expectations in the second half of the year that they reached in the first half...so the market didn't grow because of the tax cuts causing a sugar high in Q1 and Q2.
That's got nothing to do with the Fed and everything to do with your shitty Russia Tax Cut.
cawacko
Well-known member
You literally lie every post now. Show where I spoke about the Fed and 2018’s market performance
So...you bitch about California's lack of affordable housing, then you dismiss the empirically proven evidence showing that government funded affordable housing was successfully used by millions of people, including Howard Shultz who you lionize.
Then you try and pretend that I want to copy, brick-for-brick, what we did before when you know that's not the case or intent. The same principle we used to build affordable housing for millions of people in the 50's is applicable to the 2020's.
Problem: A lack of affordable housing
Solution: Government-funded and financed construction of affordable housing units.
Means: Repealing Prop 13 and using the revenue windfall to fund that construction
It's so simple, even my cat understands it...and he licks his own ass. So what's your excuse?
The Fed had nothing to do with soaring earnings in Q1 and Q2, nor did the Fed have anything to do with missing those earnings expectations in Q3 and Q4.
That was all the Russia Tax Cut.
Then what the fuck are we even talking about?
You want to blame the Fed for something...not sure what...then deny the empirical evidence showing the Fed's effect on the market in 2018 -the most recent data we can extrapolate- was negligible because the market grew and fell because of the diabetic shock of increased, after-tax earnings thanks to the tax cut. Earnings growth that couldn't be sustained the full year because the tax cut was a one-time thing.
PoliTalker
Diversity Makes Greatness
Hello cawacko,
It should all be no fee. We want to encourage as much ridership as possible. Individual cars cause more emissions.
It should all be no fee. We want to encourage as much ridership as possible. Individual cars cause more emissions.
Look at the stats, though. Alaska is one of the wealthiest states (third in the nation for median household income). Utah and Wyoming are among the top third of wealthiest states. I'm not seeing a strong link there, are you?
christiefan915
Catalyst
^ The bolded is not what she was talking about. It was about correlation between cloudiness and lower temps.
Effects of Cloud Cover on forecasted temperatures.
During the day, the earth is heated by the sun. If skies are clear, more heat reaches the earth's surface (as in the diagram below). This leads to warmer temperatures. However, if skies are cloudy, some of the sun's rays are reflected off the cloud droplets back into space. Therefore, less of the sun's energy is able to reach the earth's surface, which causes the earth to heat up more slowly. This leads to cooler temperatures.
Forecast Tip:
When forecasting daytime temperatures, if cloudy skies are expected, forecast lower temperatures than you would predict if clear skies were expected.
Superfreak
Verified User
LMAO... ok christie. That is not what she said at all. But do go on pretending.
christiefan915
Catalyst
If you want to continue pretending she didn't say this, knock yourself out. "colder means more clouds and less sun"
Callinectes
Proud MAGA Semi-Facist
This makes no sense. Depressed people vote for Trump, see the country turning around, and commit suicide? Nah, much more likely that triggered twinklepuffs are depressed that Trump won the election, and driven over the edge to suicide because he keeps winning
See? THIS hot mess was not a Trump supporter!
Superfreak
Verified User
Colder does not mean that. Colder CAN happen in that situation, but it doesn't always mean that. I know words are hard for you. Its ok... you have a lot of liberal morons on here that will support you anyway.
christiefan915
Catalyst
Feel free to offer your alternate theory then.
"Have you ever been outside on a warm sunny day, and suddenly the sun goes behind a cloud and the temperature feels like it drops several degrees? Then, you’ve experienced the energy of the sun and what happens when that energy is blocked.
The Earth gets it’s heat from the energy contained in rays of sunlight. Take that energy away and the amount of heat given to the Earth decreases. That’s what happens when clouds block even a small amount of the sunlight. The clouds not only block the sunlight, they block the energy needed to increase the temperature."
Superfreak
Verified User
LMAO... keep spinning. Again, yes, it will feel cooler if a cloud goes between you and the sun. But colder doesn't mean there are clouds. It can be a bright sun shiny day with no clouds and be sub zero.
Conversely, you it depends on timing. If you go out in the morning and it is cloudy, the temperature can still rise throughout the day, even when it remains cloudy.
reagansghost
eternal
go hand-in-hand