Stuck: Most still say Biden ‘cheating’ beat Trump

ExpressLane said:
You don't know shit about me so don't pretend that you do, moron. I want a fair and full forensic audit in a few key counties. That isn't to much to ask. Why are liberals so afraid of a forensic audit? It can only give us the truth. If there was no fraud then its the best thing that could happen for you. But if there was widespread fraud......
Click to expand...
Get back to us when you have collected $2 billion to pay for an audit. As long as you pay for it, I see no problem with conducting an audit. The problem is you want the rest of us to pay for you delusional claims.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
And then when the audit shows no evidence of fraud, you will simply demand another audit.
If I lived in Az, I would be pissed at the GOP for wasting my taxpayer money. They should put up their own damn money instead of stealing it from schools and roads.
Click to expand...
The state legislature who is elected by the taxpayers ordered the forensic audit. If the audit finds nothing, great, it will give people new confidence in their election. If it shows large scale fraud it will lead to change in the system to guard against future fraud. Either find is a win. I'm sure if you lived in Arizona you would be pissed by the prospect of illegal democrat cheating being exposed.
 
Last edited:
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Get back to us when you have collected $2 billion to pay for an audit. As long as you pay for it, I see no problem with conducting an audit. The problem is you want the rest of us to pay for you delusional claims.
Click to expand...
Relax the taxpayers elected the state representatives that voted for the audit. Its the taxpayers will.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
And then when the audit shows no evidence of fraud, you will simply demand another audit.
If I lived in Az, I would be pissed at the GOP for wasting my taxpayer money. They should put up their own damn money instead of stealing it from schools and roads.
Click to expand...

Correct. This is birtherism part two. The biggest mistake Obama ever made was giving in to the demands to release his 'long form' birth certificate. Reality is not a concern for the Trumptards. So why indulge them? We won. They lost. I'm good with that.
 
Drummie123 said:
The failure to consider the evidence of election rigging is not the same as there not being any evidence.
Click to expand...

There is no evidence to consider.

And while we're on the subject of election cheating, there is no way Trump got 74M votes, so I believe he cheated.

The votes in FL do not match the party registration, and that's the only state where that is an issue.

So until you can prove that Trump legitimately got 74M votes, you can't even begin to go after Biden's 81M votes.

So prove that Trump got 74M votes without using any certified election results.

Go ahead.

I dare you.

I double dog dare you.

Prove to all of us that Trump got 74M votes, and then we can talk about whether or not he was cheated.
 
Concart said:
NO THEY DID NOT. They interpreted the existing laws, as they are charged to do. State legislatures don't run the election. State legislatures don't pick the electors. They write legislation outlining the process. State courts can review and interpret that legislation. Why is this so hard for you to grasp? Are you slightly retarded?
Click to expand...

So surely you have a US Supreme Court ruling that backs up your statement?
 
Drummie123 said:
The failure to consider the evidence of election rigging is not the same as there not being any evidence.

Just one reason why Biden/Harris will never be a 'legitimate' government.

You can make up silly rationales to excuse it, but MOST Americans know the truth.

If Biden really won, they would consider every bit of the evidence so that most Americans would see that he won and would then help solidify the support for him.

But nooooooooo, your dumbass, senile, decrepit, pedophilic, traitorous, sex predator has to hide behind bull shit lies and obfuscation.

And you are there to lick his spittle.
Click to expand...

You need to prove Trump got 74M votes because I don't believe it, and I am convinced there was fraud there.
 
Drummie123 said:
If Biden really won, they would consider every bit of the evidence so that most Americans would see that he won and would then help solidify the support for him.
Click to expand...

1. Fuck your feelings.

2. You need to prove to me that Trump got 74M votes, because I don't believe it and I've seen no evidence that settles my concerns and worries around that total. Almost every single individual case of voter fraud was perpetrated by Trump voters....so I don't believe your claim that Trump got 74M votes. So you need to settle MY concerns and worries around potential fraud by YOU.
 
Last edited:
martin said:
Rasmussen polls are usually outliers in the first place. Biden's much greater popularity over Trump's suggests they are an outlier again here. In the second place, opinion is not "evidence".
Click to expand...

A broadcast tradition: 90% of Trump coverage remains negative, study finds

By Jennifer Harper - The Washington Times - Tuesday, January 15, 2019
It has become a cultural norm as President Trump approaches two years in office: Broadcast news coverage remains 90 percent negative, according to a massive study released Tuesday.

“At the midpoint of Donald Trump’s first term, the establishment media’s obvious hostility shows no signs of relenting, but polls show this negative coverage has had no discernible impact on the public’s attitudes toward the President,” wrote Rich Noyes, senior editor of Newsbusters.org, a conservative press watchdog.

Indeed, opinion poll numbers suggest that despite the negative press, Mr. Trump’s poll numbers are creeping upwards.

“The media elite have clearly waded into the political fray to wage war against this President. But have they accomplished anything beyond cementing their reputation as political partisans, not objective journalists?” he asked.

Beginning Jan. 20, 2017, Mr. Noyes and his team analyzed “every moment of coverage” about Mr. Trump which aired on ABC, CBS and NBC evening newscasts — an audience of some 23 million nightly viewers.

“The tone of coverage remains incessantly hostile: 90 percent negative, vs. just 10 percent positive (excluding neutral statements), matching the historically bad press we documented in 2017. Yet despite the media’s obvious disapproval, public opinion of the President actually improved slightly during 2018, from an average 40 percent approval on January 1 to 42.7 percent approval on December 31, according to RealClearPolitics,” Mr. Noyes wrote.

Yet the president remains the most popular topic of all.

“As it was last year, the Trump presidency was the biggest story of 2018, accounting for almost 87 hours of coverage, or 28 percent of all evening news airtime. But that’s down from 99 hours of coverage in 2017, perhaps a sign the networks are wearying of treating every Trump tweet as deserving of crisis-level coverage,” Mr. Noyes said.

“For the second year in a row, the Russia investigation was the single most-covered topic amid the networks’ Trump coverage, garnering 858 minutes of airtime. Since January 20, 2017, the Russia probe has received 2,092 minutes of coverage on just the three evening newscasts,” he noted.

A Newsbusters.org study of broadcast coverage centered on Mr. Trump’s first year in office, and released a year ago, also found the programming to be 90 percent negative
Click to expand...

https://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2019/jan/15/a-broadcast-tradition-90-of-trump-coverage-remains/
 
LV426 said:
1. Fuck your feelings.

2. You need to prove to me that Trump got 74M votes, because I don't believe it and I've seen no evidence that settles my concerns and worries around that total. Almost every single individual case of voter fraud was perpetrated by Trump voters....so I don't believe your claim that Trump got 74M votes. So you need to settle MY concerns and worries around potential fraud by YOU.
Click to expand...

Every time I take you off, "ignore," you always find your way back.
 
Drummie123 said:
Every time I take you off, "ignore," you always find your way back.
Click to expand...

Prove to all of us that Trump got 74M votes without using any certified election results.

Don't understand why you refuse to settle my concerns and worries that Trump cheated.
 
Drummie123 said:
Every time I take you off, "ignore," you always find your way back.
Click to expand...

LOL @ you.

This is really hilarious. You weren't expecting me to turn your bullshit nonsense back on you, were you? That wasn't part of the script, was it?

So before you can accuse Biden of cheating, you first need to prove that Trump didn't cheat and that he truly got 74M votes, because I don't believe he did and I won't trust claims that he did until I see actual proof.
 
ExpressLane said:
The state legislature who is elected by the taxpayers ordered the forensic audit. If the audit finds nothing, great, it will give people new confidence in their election. If it shows large scale fraud it will lead to change in the system to guard against future fraud. Either find is a win. I'm sure if you lived in Arizona you would be pissed by the prospect of illegal democrat cheating being exposed.
Click to expand...

And the taxpayers are free to elect a different legislator when the current one wastes taxpayer money trying trying to attack the voters choice by auditing an election with no evidence of fraud. Considering I have several relatives living in AZ, including some that voted for Trump, I see no one being concerned about voter fraud by Democrats in AZ. But they certainly don't like their taxpayer money wasted on frivolous bull shit.

I'll bet you $100,000 that they find no evidence of large scale fraud. Are you willing to put your money where you mouth is? It seems the legislature is only willing to put up other people's money. What about you?
 
ExpressLane said:
Relax the taxpayers elected the state representatives that voted for the audit. Its the taxpayers will.
Click to expand...

Taxpayers didn't ask for it. It seems you don't understand how the political system works. We vote someone in. If we don't like what they do, we vote them out. Case in point would be Donald Trump.
 
Taft2016 said:
The courts determined an American citizen has no standing to question whether or not his President is Constitutionally eligible to hold the office.

Hooray, another step down into tyranny.
Click to expand...

on what planet did someone bend you over and fill you up with that nonsense? the courts ended the dumbass obama birther bullshit by claiming no one had legal standing question a candidates qualifications?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top