Soul Searching for Libs

Liberty has officially replaced me as the Lord over Asshate. I play around too much, and am often far to subtle and club-mannered, but Liberty goes right for the Adam's Apple and calls the prick out. Spot on, fellow!!

Liberty is a fascist asshole. Like you.
 
Not really. They believe the entire government should be prostituted to the needs and desires of corporations.

You demand an action from government. It is you who has an agenda to make the government behave in a certain way, to place force on entities whom you are envious of. That makes it you who views the government as a force to be prostituted, and not the libertarians.
 
You demand an action from government. It is you who has an agenda to make the government behave in a certain way, to place force on entities whom you are envious of. That makes it you who views the government as a force to be prostituted, and not the libertarians.

I would prefer corporations not sell us out and create a one way trade imbalance / money suck that will destroy the american worker. When your precious "free trade" turns out to be a system of destruction, and the "rising tide raises all ships" dogma is proven to be a lie, people have no other recourse than government. the treachery of the business world is forcing people to the side of government.

the government is supposed to see to the general welfare, and it used to with sensible trade policy. Abandoning sensible trade policy and allowing slave labor into the international labor pool is when government became the whore.
 
I would prefer corporations not sell us out and create a one way trade imbalance / money suck that will destroy the american worker. When your precious "free trade" turns out to be a system of destruction, and the "rising tide raises all ships" dogma is proven to be a lie, people have no other recourse than government. the treachery of the business world is forcing people to the side of government.

the government is supposed to see to the general welfare, and it used to with sensible trade policy. Abandoning sensible trade policy and allowing slave labor into the international labor pool is when government became the whore.

I would prefer corporations cater to my every whim and desire, but its not my assets and property, so I don't get to decide. If you want an alternative business model, then its your job to go out and start your own business, or to support entrepreneurs who will do it in your stead. Also, you can petition the government to create its own corporations and engage them in protective trade.
 
I would prefer corporations cater to my every whim and desire, but its not my assets and property, so I don't get to decide. If you want an alternative business model, then its your job to go out and start your own business, or to support entrepreneurs who will do it in your stead. Also, you can petition the government to create its own corporations and engage them in protective trade.

there are known problems with perpetual trade imbalances. Im not just making shit up.

The government is shirking it's duty under the constitution to promote the general welfare of the citizenry, and is instead, just doing what their corporate paymasters want them to do. It's called corruption, negligence, and treason.
 
I would prefer corporations not sell us out and create a one way trade imbalance / money suck that will destroy the american worker. When your precious "free trade" turns out to be a system of destruction, and the "rising tide raises all ships" dogma is proven to be a lie, people have no other recourse than government. the treachery of the business world is forcing people to the side of government.

the government is supposed to see to the general welfare, and it used to with sensible trade policy. Abandoning sensible trade policy and allowing slave labor into the international labor pool is when government became the whore.

AssHat, you wonder why corporations are given special treatment. Watch this video from 1:45 to 2:25 minutes.Take less than one minute of your time and view it. Then you'll understand.

 
there are known problems with perpetual trade imbalances. Im not just making shit up.

Yes, you are. Even if you weren't, its not government's job to tell people how to manage their businesses.

The government is shirking it's duty under the constitution to promote the general welfare of the citizenry, and is instead, just doing what their corporate paymasters want them to do. It's called corruption, negligence, and treason.

The preamble to the constitution is not legally binding. Furthermore, your perception of the general welfare (which is a decidedly Marxist attitude) does not trump people's natural rights to liberty and property.
 
Yes, you are. Even if you weren't, its not government's job to tell people how to manage their businesses.



The preamble to the constitution is not legally binding. Furthermore, your perception of the general welfare (which is a decidedly Marxist attitude) does not trump people's natural rights to liberty and property.

The preamble is legally binding.

It is the government's job to set trade policy which allows it's citizens to flourish.

Im not a socialist. I just believe the governments is tasked to set a trade policy where more than just ceos of multinationals and bankers can flourish.

Setting a trade policy is not marxism.
 
The preamble is legally binding.

It is the government's job to set trade policy which allows it's citizens to flourish.

Im not a socialist. I just believe the governments is tasked to set a trade policy where more than just ceos of multinationals and bankers can flourish.

Setting a trade policy is not marxism.

You are a socialist, and setting trade policy in the terms you want it, is marxism.

Also, please inform the Supreme Court that the Preamble is legally binding, as it has previously ruled that it is not.
 
You are a socialist, and setting trade policy in the terms you want it, is marxism.

Also, please inform the Supreme Court that the Preamble is legally binding, as it has previously ruled that it is not.

i am not a socialist. I do not believe i redistributing wealth. I believe in our right to choose trade relationships which benefit the country, instead of destroying it.

there is no way that protectionism will ever be marxism. the intellectual stupidity of your assertion is astounding in the extreme. That makes you astoundingly stupid.
 
i am not a socialist. I do not believe i redistributing wealth. I believe in our right to choose trade relationships which benefit the country, instead of destroying it.

there is no way that protectionism will ever be marxism. the intellectual stupidity of your assertion is astounding in the extreme. That makes you astoundingly stupid.

It is not OUR right to choose trade relationships, as it is not OUR property being traded.
 
Well as long as you get yours..

but seriously though, no tax cut will make up for the cost difference of using slaves versus free men.

Why do you like to incentivize tyranny?

Income tax is slavery in my opinion.

In my opinion income tax is tyranny.

Incentivize tyranny? Where have I said anything promoting, or encouraging tyranny?
 
You demand an action from government. It is you who has an agenda to make the government behave in a certain way, to place force on entities whom you are envious of. That makes it you who views the government as a force to be prostituted, and not the libertarians.

Great point Threedee.
 
the government sets trade policy. Yes it does. Accept reality and stop being an idiotic douche.

Nya-nya, I get to fuck with your property, because I can make the government do what I want it to do!! :tongout:

Grow up, Asshate. No one considers it appropriate to establish the kind of trade restrictions that you have in mind. Tariffs and revenue bills are not dictates on private enterprise, which is obviously why you don't consider them to be good enough.
 
Back
Top