Something I don't understand, and no one has yet to explain it, what is the point

Since the common theme seems to be that the South "lost", should we now tear down all memorials to what the left consider illegal and undeclared wars; seeing as how we "lost" several of them, according to liberals?

The name "Democratic Party", with its awful history, should be retired. Just hearing or reading that Party name offends me.

The statues are NOT there to honor slavery OR the Democratic Party that fought to preserve it.
 
should we tear down martin luther king jr. statues because he was against gay people and suggested they see psychiatrists?

I have often enjoyed seeing confederate statues taken down, myself and 3d and other northerners often troll the south on this board for losing the war due to being the traitors they are.

But this isn't about really taken down statues of mean guys. It's about erasing history and being spiteful. Intention does matter a bit. Personally I don't care what happens to these statues but I do distrust the motivations of those bringing them down and I bet we will reach a day where people will want to take down jefferson because he owned slaves. I'd have more respect if the side doing this were consistent on their beliefs regarding every person in history having values out of sync with modern standards coming down, but they don't do that.

:hand::hand::hand:
 
should we tear down martin luther king jr. statues because he was against gay people and suggested they see psychiatrists?

I have often enjoyed seeing confederate statues taken down, myself and 3d and other northerners often troll the south on this board for losing the war due to being the traitors they are.

But this isn't about really taken down statues of mean guys. It's about erasing history and being spiteful. Intention does matter a bit. Personally I don't care what happens to these statues but I do distrust the motivations of those bringing them down and I bet we will reach a day where people will want to take down jefferson because he owned slaves. I'd have more respect if the side doing this were consistent on their beliefs regarding every person in history having values out of sync with modern standards coming down, but they don't do that.

It's fun to be spiteful toward the south. After all, the CSA killed more than 400k Americans in the War of Southern Stupidity. Tearing down the statues of worthless southern traitors is just a fun exercise in showing a conquered people how they lost. I don't really consider southerners to be real Americans, because, they are only part of the US by virtue of being conquered and subjugated.
 
They fought and LOST!

But you want to keep the "participation trophies" up.

They FOUGHT.

Your post proves you don't know what "participation trophy" means. It's because you've never done anything close to participating just being there running your dick sucker.
 
Trump was elected to keep America stuck in the past. They elected him to halt the evolution of the American population.

They FEAR the browning of America.

Statues are their way of clinging to the past when all the heroes were white.

If only they had ovens.

Your kind has been halting it for years but the rest of us have worked hard to overcome it.

If only you could keep up.
 
They FOUGHT.

Your post proves you don't know what "participation trophy" means. It's because you've never done anything close to participating just being there running your dick sucker.

And just like the losing team that gets a participation trophy, the South fought AND LOST.

You want to whine about kids getting participation trophies, then be consistent and do some bitching about the losing side in the Civil War getting it's own "participation trophies".
 
The name "Democratic Party", with its awful history, should be retired. Just hearing or reading that Party name offends me.

The statues are NOT there to honor slavery OR the Democratic Party that fought to preserve it.

Racists like to try and pretend the Civil War WASN'T about slavery, but supporting slavery and wanting to keep their slaves was the primary reason the South seceded.

I find it amazing just how many supposed "patriots" try and pretend otherwise.
 
should we tear down martin luther king jr. statues because he was against gay people and suggested they see psychiatrists?

I have often enjoyed seeing confederate statues taken down, myself and 3d and other northerners often troll the south on this board for losing the war due to being the traitors they are.

But this isn't about really taken down statues of mean guys. It's about erasing history and being spiteful. Intention does matter a bit. Personally I don't care what happens to these statues but I do distrust the motivations of those bringing them down and I bet we will reach a day where people will want to take down jefferson because he owned slaves. I'd have more respect if the side doing this were consistent on their beliefs regarding every person in history having values out of sync with modern standards coming down, but they don't do that.

i don't see democrats tearing down all the stuff named after KKK Robert Byrd, do you?
 
according to your fellow lib losing is the deciding factor.



and yes, MLK was a traitor investigated by the FBI

even malcomX admitted MLK was a traitor

lol

You mean he was investigated by Hoover. A racist fuck like you is quoting Malcolm X. Priceless!

The traitors in your precious statues fought a war against the United States of America and lost. We don't commemorate any other country that we defeated in war, do we?

Work on your grammar, illiterate.
 
lol

You mean he was investigated by Hoover. A racist fuck like you is quoting Malcolm X. Priceless!

The traitors in your precious statues fought a war against the United States of America and lost. We don't commemorate any other country that we defeated in war, do we?

Work on your grammar, illiterate.

i accept your concession
 
our past will not be erased

just like there are statues of Oliver Cromwell in England today the past is memorialized

confederacy and civil war are part of Americas history

btw Jackson was hands down the most able commander of cavalry in history

It should not be erased, but it also should not be honored. There are places for such statues, in museum's but not in places of honor.
 
It should not be erased, but it also should not be honored. There are places for such statues, in museum's but not in places of honor.


define places of honor. in england there are statues of people who fought and lost plenty including Cromwell and King Charles in what most would consider places of honor not museums
 
I love how the Republicans are fighting so hard to keep statutes of the OLD Democratic party in honored locations.

More evidence that the parties switched sides on racism.
 
define places of honor. in england there are statues of people who fought and lost plenty including Cromwell and King Charles in what most would consider places of honor not museums

1) I dont give a shit about England and how they do it.
2) State Houses, Capitols, Government Property, the National Mall, Court Houses are all places of honor.
 
Back
Top