solid proof of evolution

Thing1 said:
Sorry, Darth - you're the one who misread PMP's post that started the exchange. He was talking about man evolving from a single-celled organism. Not about the inception of that single-celled organism.
Click to expand...

and obviously you misread it as well, because you thought I was denying evolution......
 
CFM said:
Unless you have proof of life on other planets to the degree you expect God to provide it to you, it's wishful thinking. If there was life on those other planets, wouldn't you think that life would have found a way to show its existence by now?
Click to expand...

no. Distances are too far. Alpha Centauri, our nearest galaxy neighbor is 4.4 light years away. We could go there , if we have 100 years to do it. Then a message sent back would take 4.5 years.
 
View First Unread
Thread Tools
Search Thread
Rate This Thread
Display
Today, 12:46 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:47 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:49 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:52 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:54 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:55 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:56 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
Today, 12:59 PM
PostmodernProphet
fully immersed in faith..

This message is hidden because PostmodernProphet is on your ignore list.
 
Darth Omar said:
But as strictly a philosophical matter, it’s quite rational to infer design based on the evidence.

Why is that so threatening to some people?
Click to expand...

I'm not threatened by it, and I'm not talking philosophy - I'm talking strictly in terms of the science.

I actually think it's the scientific aspect that some find threatening.
 
Thing1 said:
I'm not threatened by it, and I'm not talking philosophy - I'm talking strictly in terms of the science.

I actually think it's the scientific aspect that some find threatening.
Click to expand...

‘Rational’ isn’t the sole provenance of science.

It’s entirely rational to infer a Creator—based on the evidence of science. Some people find that threatening.
 
Darth Omar said:
But as strictly a philosophical matter, it’s quite rational to infer design based on the evidence.

Why is that so threatening to some people?
Click to expand...

No it is not. Philosophy answers questions. it does not formulate more. Is it rational to infer a collection of gods made the universe?
 
Nordberg said:
Since it was 3.5 billion years ago, there are no traces. However you can work backwards through time and surmise the direrection . Entering all know data ,you make a computer model to show how it works. https://news.nationalgeographic.com/news/2010/05/100513-science-evolution-darwin-single-ancestor/
Click to expand...

Thats what they do with evolution....
you 'surmise' your own evidence ?..rats have legs and so do humans, hence etc. etc........sounds exactly like what those Bible thumpers do....
 
Controlled Opposition said:
Scientists try to speak with precision. I, personally, believe in evolution, but when it becomes a "fact" scientists will stop calling it a "theory."
Click to expand...

Parts of it are fact.

Bacteria evolve resistance to antibiotics through natural selection acting on mutations. I absolutely believe that because the evidence is unassailable.

When you get into macro evolution I start to get a little shakey lol, though I’m fairly confident in it. I’m even more skeptical of the alleged jump from single cell organisms to multicellular organisms with organs, limbs etc.

And even though it’s not evolution, I’m severely skeptical something like DNA and the genetic code could form from simple organic chemicals, regardless of time or number of trials involved.
 
evince said:
you hate science huh
Click to expand...

Of course he does. He is a delusional hate filled moron whose ego is aligned with an absolute absurdity.
Why would he not hate objectivism, rationalism, empiricism, logic, proportion and reality?

They are delusional idiots. They are incapable of reason. It would take deprogramming to make these losers worthy of your time in conversation.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top