Socially acceptable to be racist?

the latest is "extreme vetting" . form certain countries.
It is most certainly not increasing Syrian refugees 10 fold like Hillary wants
 
anatta said:
the latest is "extreme vetting" . form certain countries.
It is most certainly not increasing Syrian refugees 10 fold like Hillary wants
Click to expand...

This thread is not about the newest incarnation of Trump.... The one trying to get more votes...

This thread is about the deplorable's who support the original policy of banning an entire religion. Its about how Trump garnered the support in the first place, not how he morphed into someone more demographics might be tricked into finding acceptable. (I'm looking at you Anatta.)
 
Darth Hussein Omar said:
Like I said, go with it lol.

Have you seen the polls numbers today? Maybe if the media doubles down on it, it might help.

Then again maybe it's part of the problem.
Click to expand...

Sadly, in America, "winning" and being "right" are often confused with each other.
 
Legion Troll said:
Like in personal injury settlements?
Click to expand...

Sometimes... yes. Certainty not always. Juries often are wrong also.

I have won trials I should not have won and lost trials I should have won.

That is why settlement is often a better option.
 
Jarod said:
This thread is not about his newest incarnation of Trump.... The one trying to get more votes...

This thread is about the deplorable's who support the original policy of banning an entire religion. Its about how Trump garnered the support in the first place, not how he morphed into someone more demographics might be tricked into finding acceptable. (I'm looking at you Anatta.)
Click to expand...
1. there was discussion from yourself and other about "banning Moslems" - so you went there not me.
2. "tricked"is obviously a loaded word. For me it started with "ABC" = anybody but Clinton for reasons I've gone over.
But going 3rd party is ineffective if you want to shake up establishment politics.

Us deplorables ain't stupid, nor are we driven by xenophobic racism. Don't talk down to us.
Trump's ideas on repatriation of foreign profits,as well as border controls -
as well as my personal bias of stamping out Politically correct related garbage speak is enough for me to overlook his facile shakey speech.

Afterall it's a choice. a deplorable Clinton, or someone with high energy who's gonna re-shuffle politics.
 
Jarod said:
I just finished reading ALL of Turner v. Williams, it does not contain your quote... Maybe I missed it, do you mind citing to a page number?
Click to expand...

It was from wiki, probably a paraphrase here is the relevant section verbatim:


Repeated decisions of this court have determined that Congress has the power to exclude aliens from the United States; to prescribe the terms and conditions of which they may come in; to establish regulations for sending out of the country such aliens as have entered in violation of law, and to commit the enforcement of such conditions and regulations to executive officers; that the deportation of an alien who is found to be here in violation of law is not a deprivation of liberty without due process of law, and that the provisions of the Constitution securing the right of trial by jury have no application.

http://praxeology.net/USC-TW.htm
 
anatta said:
1. there was discussion from yourself and other about "banning Moslems" - so you went there not me.
2. "tricked"is obviously a loaded word. For me it started with "ABC" = anybody but Clinton for reasons I've gone over.
But going 3rd party is ineffective if you want to shake up establishment politics.

Us deplorables ain't stupid, nor are we driven by xenophobic racism. Don't talk down to us.
Trump's ideas on repatriation of foreign profits,as well as border controls -
as well as my personal bias of stamping out Politically correct related garbage speak is enough for me to overlook his facile shakey speech.

Afterall it's a choice. a deplorable Clinton, or someone with high energy who's gonna re-shuffle politics.
Click to expand...


Those of you not driven by xenophobic racism are not deplorables, look at what Clinton said....

You can call yourself a "deplorable" all you want, Clinton did not call you one.
 
Jarod said:
No, I am not opposed to banning homophobic people, anti-semites, or misogynistic people. I am not opposed to banning violent people. I am not opposed to banning totalitarians.
Click to expand...

Then you can not possibly be opposed to banning those who adhere to the ideology of Islam.
 
Jarod said:
No, by definition there are no good Nazi's or Stalinists because those are ideologies that are inherently inconsistent with freedom.
Click to expand...

So is the ideology of Islam.


You are clearly lacking in an understanding of the difference between an ideology and a religion?
Click to expand...

There is no difference between an ideoloy and a religion save that religion claims to come from an all powerful sky daddy which makes it even more dangerous.
 
Jarod said:
Those of you not driven by xenophobic racism are not deplorables, look at what Clinton said....
You can call yourself a "deplorable" all you want, Clinton did not call you one.
Click to expand...
I'm gladly a deplorable. Clinton 's pandering to every frigging Democratic interest group ( typical Dem politics)-
is plenty divisive in itself.

And her condescending bullshit about "the rest left behind" or whatever characterization of nativists -
she can cram them .
Let her worry about her voters, and quit trying to debase Trumps. Thanks.
 
Jarod said:
I understand your desire to not engage and keep your ideas intact.
Click to expand...

El Oh El. Tell us Jarod how you and other democrats don't like homophobes yet nominate and support Obama and Hillary who both were against gay marriage?

Tell us how democrats who are so against war, support a nominee who voted for the Iraq war and is essentially a neo-con on foreign policy?
 
anatta said:
I'm gladly a deplorable. Clinton 's pandering to every frigging Democratic interest group ( typical Dem politics)-
is plenty divisive in itself.

And her condescending bullshit about "the rest left behind" or whatever characterization of nativists -
she can cram them .
Let her worry about her voters, and quit trying to debase Trumps. Thanks.
Click to expand...

You can call yourself a deplorable all you want. Just know that Hillary did not call you Deplorable.
 
cawacko said:
El Oh El. Tell us Jarod how you and other democrats don't like homophobes yet nominate and support Obama and Hillary who both were against gay marriage?

Tell us how democrats who are so against war, support a nominee who voted for the Iraq war and is essentially a neo-con on foreign policy?
Click to expand...

Hillary was against gay marriage. I don't like that. She is not perfect. Trump is against gay marriage.

Both major party candidates were for the Iraq War. Hilary has admitted it was a mistake. Trump simply lies.
 
Jarod said:
You can call yourself a deplorable all you want. Just know that Hillary did not call you Deplorable.
Click to expand...
why not?
how do you know what I think? what drives my politics?

That's the objection -it's her sanctimonious, self serving marginalization of 1/4 of the electorate.
Who the hell is she? - a corrupted big donor warmongering, elitist ( listen to her snobs in the audience laughing it up) -serial lying
executive order driven.....to call out anybody on anything
 
Jarod said:
Hillary was against gay marriage. I don't like that. She is not perfect. Trump is against gay marriage.

Both major party candidates were for the Iraq War. Hilary has admitted it was a mistake. Trump simply lies.
Click to expand...

What policy has trump ever passed regarding either issue?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top