Socialism!!!!!

Yakuda said:
1) You said exactly the same thing as I did in a follow up post. Nice try

2) It doesn't work without capitalism. Some principles of socialism have been employed here but socialism alone never works anywhere.
Click to expand...

Neither works alone.
 
Jarod said:
Calling something “Disney’s town” is not the same thing as calling “Disney a town”, dipshit!

It is the government taking more control over a private company, now you are not one of the ones calling all kinds of things, Socialism, but compared to what a lot of TRUMPERS call Socialism, this is socialism. If I’ve had done this, they would be screaming socialist.
Click to expand...

It is not. It is a larger government taking over a governing district. This is stupid even for you. I know you don't understand the meaning of words, don't care to, refuse to believe that words have meanings, and demonstrate it regularly; but if you advocate for socialism you should at the very least understand what it means.

Nothing Disney owned was taken from Disney, nothing at all, not one piece of any property of Disney's was taken from them. This is in no way "like" socialism because it fits none of the definition of socialism.
 
Jarod said:
Where has that ever happened?
Click to expand...

It has sporadically but leftists won't allow it to happen. They seek regulations on the market because they see businesses as essentially greedy and profit driven with no concern for the customer. Am I right? Let's save time of course I'm right. So as a result of all that leftists seek to correct those "sins" through regulation. Again, am I right? Once again of course I am.
 
Damocles said:
It is not. It is a larger government taking over a governing district. This is stupid even for you. I know you don't understand the meaning of words, don't care to, refuse to believe that words have meanings, and demonstrate it regularly; but if you advocate for socialism you should at the very least understand what it means.

Nothing Disney owned was taken from Disney, nothing at all, not one piece of any property of Disney's was taken from them. This is in no way "like" socialism because it fits none of the definition of socialism.
Click to expand...

Spot on
 
“If I’ve had done this, they would be screaming socialist.”

This is not a declarative sentence by an educated person.
 
Earl said:
Those who don’t care for Capitalism are free to emigrate to Cuba (average wage is 28 dollars per month) or to Venezuela (citizens are leaving their country in search of food).


I don’t know if they allow old drag queens in public though.


Capitalism has lifted more citizens out of poverty and allowed more people to be free than any other system on earth.
Click to expand...

That last line is fucking TRUTH. Demonstrable and undeniable except to only the most rabid leftist
 
Damocles said:
It is not. It is a larger government taking over a governing district. This is stupid even for you. I know you don't understand the meaning of words, don't care to, refuse to believe that words have meanings, and demonstrate it regularly; but if you advocate for socialism you should at the very least understand what it means.

Nothing Disney owned was taken from Disney, nothing at all, not one piece of any property of Disney's was taken from them. This is in no way "like" socialism because it fits none of the definition of socialism.
Click to expand...

1) If you would bother in your arrogant way to read the thread, you would see... I agree it is not socialism, but as I have pointed out above it is very similar to what Trumppers scream is "socialism" if a Democrat were to do it.
2) Control was taken from Disney, they had a certain element of control over land that a Town usually has... that control was taken from Disney and given to financial supporters of DeSantis. The reason this was done was because Disney dared to criticize the almighty Governor, but you ignore that because you have a golden calf in DeSantis.
 
Yakuda said:
It has sporadically but leftists won't allow it to happen. They seek regulations on the market because they see businesses as essentially greedy and profit driven with no concern for the customer. Am I right? Let's save time of course I'm right. So as a result of all that leftists seek to correct those "sins" through regulation. Again, am I right? Once again of course I am.
Click to expand...

Again, WHERE HAS CAPITALISM EVER WORKED?
 
Yakuda said:
Incorrect. Where socialism rules people suffer. Where capitalism reigns people prosper. History proves this undeniably except to the most insane leftists
Click to expand...

That is simply an idiotic statement which is untrue, as is evidenced by your inability to show me where pure capitalism has ever worked.
 
Jarod said:
1) If you would bother in your arrogant way to read the thread, you would see... I agree it is not socialism, but as I have pointed out above it is very similar to what Trumppers scream is "socialism" if a Democrat were to do it.
2) Control was taken from Disney, they had a certain element of control over land that a Town usually has... that control was taken from Disney and given to financial supporters of DeSantis. The reason this was done was because Disney dared to criticize the almighty Governor, but you ignore that because you have a golden calf in DeSantis.
Click to expand...

2) Actions have consequences don't they? Disney had an advantage no other business had. Disney has not and will not suffer because of this. They are still free to pump out all the perverse garbage they want. You see that's the difference with leftists. You people arent happen until a business is ruined. The baker who refused to bake the queer cake is the best example. After they lost the queer cake battle they started with a tranny cake battle. They couldnt just move in to someone who would bake the fucked up cake they wanted to destroy the baker. Fuck you people.
 
Jarod said:
That is simply an idiotic statement which is untrue, as is evidenced by your inability to show me where pure capitalism has ever worked.
Click to expand...

First let's agree on what "pure capitalism" entails. Give us your definition of "pure capitalism".

Once we get that we can move to this:

Do you know of a place where it has been tried? Be specific, we'll see if your examples fit the definition.
 
Jarod said:
That is simply an idiotic statement which is untrue, as is evidenced by your inability to show me where pure capitalism has ever worked.
Click to expand...

I said it has only happened sporadically as people like you won't allow it.

Venezuela is thriving isn't it? Honest to God this level.of stupidity has to be an act.
 
Last edited:
Damocles said:
First let's agree on what "pure capitalism" entails. Give us your definition of "pure capitalism".

Once we get that we can move to this:

Do you know of a place where it has been tried? Be specific, we'll see if your examples fit the definition.
Click to expand...

I will respond, once you have replied to my post to you above, the one you are trying to ignore.


Do you agree with your fellow Capitalists above that disagreeing with power politically should get you slapped in business by the government?
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top