so abstract people in the future are more important than people living now?
there are no future people if the ones alive now can't thrive.
It's called 'Pre-Planning'.
so abstract people in the future are more important than people living now?
there are no future people if the ones alive now can't thrive.
So they still have cashiers. And those cashiers are being paid starting wages. So your statement was demonstrably and objectively false. And you call ME stupid? Damn skippy, you crack me up.
I believe workers have a right to manipulate the labor market at least as much as big business does.
Stop with the ad hominems instead any valid arguments based on economics. With equal protection of our own laws, your bias is irrelevant and with faith execution of our own laws, the Poor would have more chance to move up locally instead of having to emigrant due to safety concerns due to inequality issues.
I would argue that they have the right to try.
Then again, they're always welcome to walk...
you favor creating a new bureaucracy over using existing legal and physical infrastructure we can merely upgrade?so. ubi?
So how do you think a business should respond to a demand for pay which is not commensurate with the job being performed?
Show us that express clause in our federal Constitution.borders are integral to every nation, shitfer brains.
Yes, instead of ten cashier's they now have two. So eight $10 an hour employees got shit-canned and two $10 an hour cashier's get bumped to $15 an hour.
Wal-Mart saves a shit ton of money with such a move. They're saving $70 every hour, or $1,190 per operating day. That equates to $8,330 a week, or roughly $433,160 a year. If they do that with all 10,500 of their stores they'll save around $4.5 billion a year. You think they won't do that? The writing's on the wall. According to the General Manager at my local Wal-Mart, they've been told to expect to be 100% self-service by 2025...
You are incorrect. Our disagreement is about right-wing hypocrisy about being legal to our own laws in border threads.OK. Thanks. A rational understanding of 'immigration'.
(it is 'the number of immigrants'. our only disagreement is the 'number')
Show us that express clause in our federal Constitution.
you favor creating a new bureaucracy over using existing legal and physical infrastructure we can merely upgrade?
It says the general welfare not the general malfare.Article I, Section 8, Clause 1: The Congress shall have Power To lay and collect Taxes, Duties, Imposts and Excises, to pay the Debts and provide for the common Defence and general Welfare of the United States; but all Duties, Imposts and Excises shall be uniform throughout the United States;
Yes, instead of ten cashier's they now have two. So eight $10 an hour employees got shit-canned and two $10 an hour cashier's get bumped to $15 an hour.
Wal-Mart saves a shit ton of money with such a move. They're saving $70 every hour, or $1,190 per operating day. That equates to $8,330 a week, or roughly $433,160 a year. If they do that with all 10,500 of their stores they'll save around $4.5 billion a year. You think they won't do that? The writing's on the wall. According to the General Manager at my local Wal-Mart, they've been told to expect to be 100% self-service by 2025...
OK. Thanks. A rational understanding of 'immigration'.
(it is 'the number of immigrants'. our only disagreement is the 'number')
How would it be implemented?I don't think ubi requires a new bureaucracy.
It says the general welfare not the general malfare.
You are incorrect. Our disagreement is about right-wing hypocrisy about being legal to our own laws in border threads.
We don't have a common defense issue on our border; it is a commerce clause issue based upon our general welfare clause, and the express establishment clause that covers this topic.it also says common defense (defence).
Lax immigration policies are a fascist labor market manipulation.