So lets pretend its Clinton v. Christie...

Kane said:
Jarod would vote for Hillary if she personally murdered his whole family in front of him.
Click to expand...

and you would vote for your candidate if they tortured and killed your entire family?

i still prefer hilary over the other candidates...so far
 
As long as the other candidate was a Republican, then yes, I believe Jarod would vote for Hillary even if she did that.

In this forum we have many like him. Nothing the Democrat politician does can ever be wrong.
 
The democratic party would not nominate a murderer... Neither would the republican party. Both parties will always nominate a candidate that runs on their party's platform. I am sure that there were republicans who were not thrilled with Mitt just like I am sure that there were democrats who were not thrilled with Obama. I personally came late to the Obama camp in 2008. I was a Bill Richardson supporter and held fundraisers for him. But in the end, I came to support Obama because he was my party's candidate. Even though the GOP candidate and I shared the same alma mater, we shared little else, especially in term's of our political philosophy. Candidates will come and candidates will go. The list of viable candidates changes every four years, but the platform of the party those candidates run on evolves very slowly in most instances. As long as I believe in the platform of the democratic party, I will always vote for the democratic presidential candidate. The GOP candidate in any election may be more handsome and more charismatic, but the platform upon which he stands is one that I oppose and he, or she, will therefore not get my vote.
 
maineman said:
The democratic party would not nominate a murderer... Neither would the republican party. Both parties will always nominate a candidate that runs on their party's platform. I am sure that there were republicans who were not thrilled with Mitt just like I am sure that there were democrats who were not thrilled with Obama. I personally came late to the Obama camp in 2008. I was a Bill Richardson supporter and held fundraisers for him. But in the end, I came to support Obama because he was my party's candidate. Even though the GOP candidate and I shared the same alma mater, we shared little else, especially in term's of our political philosophy. Candidates will come and candidates will go. The list of viable candidates changes every four years, but the platform of the party those candidates run on evolves very slowly in most instances. As long as I believe in the platform of the democratic party, I will always vote for the democratic presidential candidate. The GOP candidate in any election may be more handsome and more charismatic, but the platform upon which he stands is one that I oppose and he, or she, will therefore not get my vote.
Click to expand...

i prefer the dim agenda to the repug agenda. while i like some things about the third party candidates, i only vote for them when it makes no difference who i vote for...or against

oh well
 
I merely suggest that if Hillary's role in Benghazi can be characterized as "murder", then certainly that standard makes Bush a murderer as well.
 
maineman said:
I merely suggest that if Hillary's role in Benghazi can be characterized as "murder", then certainly that standard makes Bush a murderer as well.
Click to expand...
Bush led troops to war. Clinton put them in harms way and abandoned them. Wouldn't you agree?
 
I grow sick and tired of the morons on the Left telling US how the GOP should be run, or telling US who should run. They did it the past two cycles and we got stuck with who?? Two RINOs with nary a Conservative bone in either one of them. That being said, if Christie does run, he'd better damned well grab a Conservative running mate!
 
DamnYankee said:
Bush led troops to war. Clinton put them in harms way and abandoned them. Wouldn't you agree?
Click to expand...

Not at all. And my comparison was between the deaths you would call murders in Benghazi and the deaths on 9/11 which had nothing to do with leading troops.
 
DamnYankee said:
The Democrat Party would deny that their candidate was a murderer: Benghazi.
Click to expand...

I'm sorry- are you unaware that consulate employees have been killed in previous administrations as well? That's the risk of having consulates in countries that are going through upheavals. But if we aren't there, we don't know what's going on.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorist_attacks_on_U.S._diplomatic_facilities

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_on_diplomatic_missions

No, Pres. Obama is not a murderer, unless you want to say all presidents are murderers because US citizens die during their terms. That seems a bit broad.
 
tekkychick said:
I'm sorry- are you unaware that consulate employees have been killed in previous administrations as well? That's the risk of having consulates in countries that are going through upheavals. But if we aren't there, we don't know what's going on.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Terrorist_attacks_on_U.S._diplomatic_facilities

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_attacks_on_diplomatic_missions

No, Pres. Obama is not a murderer, unless you want to say all presidents are murderers because US citizens die during their terms. That seems a bit broad.
Click to expand...

the repugs need something to divert the public's attention from the fact that immigration reform is doa in the house and likely the senate. their base has rebelled against any immigration reform with the usual threats to kill any signers at the next primary election
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top