Simulation shows why World Trade Center towers fell: it's the heat

Superfreak said:
It isn't meant as a gotcha... it is meant to show you why it doesn't make sense.

You cannot explain the collapse of the buildings in the manner they did with the theory that they were brought down by explosives. Period.
Click to expand...

You're implying it's impossible to make them sturdy enough to withstand some bouncing around. I don't believe that for a second.
 
AssHatZombie said:
You're implying it's impossible to make them sturdy enough to withstand some bouncing around. I don't believe that for a second.
Click to expand...

We are not talking about bouncing around... we are talking about the buildings collapsed near the impact of the planes. Thus, for 30 minutes the explosives would have been subjected to not only the impact (which took out part of the structure where you would assume the explosives would have had to be set) but also the fires.

You attempt to minimize this by saying "some bouncing around".
 
Superfreak said:
We are not talking about bouncing around... we are talking about the buildings collapsed near the impact of the planes. Thus, for 30 minutes the explosives would have been subjected to not only the impact (which took out part of the structure where you would assume the explosives would have had to be set) but also the fires.

You attempt to minimize this by saying "some bouncing around".
Click to expand...

I think some explosives could withstand some heat and fire. I heard c4 for instance will only go off with electricity, not heat alone.

None of this makes it "not make sense" for it to be an intentional demolition. It makes perfect sense. The u.s. government is perfectly capable of sculpting an event when it comes to misleading the nation into war. That's the sense it makes. They do it all the time.

Were there really military drills involving hijacked planes in new york that morning? Yes. That doesn't pass the sniff test. Grow up, fascist water carrier.
 
┐(´-｀)┌;520025 said:
http://www.guardian.co.uk/technology/blog/2009/sep/10/9-11-towers-simulation-engineering



More unscientific sheeple (national geographic, guardian, purdue university) have debunked conspiracy theorists yet again.
Click to expand...

[ ] Surprised
[x] Not surprised

Now welcome BAC and Desh to come in and say they're "just asking questions" basically parroting like any truther. And asshat believes the truthers, because he believes everything crazies say.

He's into reptoids and microwave mind control.
 
TheHappyHippo said:
[ ] Surprised
[x] Not surprised

Now welcome BAC and Desh to come in and say they're "just asking questions" basically parroting like any truther. And asshat believes the truthers, because he believes everything crazies say.

He's into reptoids and microwave mind control.
Click to expand...

And you believe ECONOMISTS! my god man. Look into the mirror and get a grip.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top