Simulation shows why World Trade Center towers fell: it's the heat

M820y.jpg
 
blackascoal said:
Au Contraire mon hackness.

That was cool simulation, but hardly convincing .. said nothing about WTC7 .. did not explain how weakness on the top floors would cause the towers to uniformly collapse at free fall speed .. lots of questions left unanswered .. and I recognize that my unanswered questions only means that I'm a racist .. and a conspiracy theorist .. only racists and conspiracy theorists have unanswered questions. It's not possiblt that some people have genuine qusetions.

I got that.

Also individually calling for a new inquiry are two dozen retired U.S. military brass and eight former U.S. State Department officials, along with a number of Republicans who have served in high federal positions since President Reagan, including former Assistant Treasury Secretary Paul Craig Roberts and former Reagan administration Assistant Defense Secretary (and retired Marine Corps colonel) Ronald D. Ray.
Click to expand...

http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm

Once again we will post this for the truly ignorant on the board. Hopefully this time a certain moron will actually READ the data and the SCIENCE that states the buildings DID NOT FALL AT FREE FALL SPEED.

But as we all know... our certain moron will simply ignore this once again in order to preserve his idiocy.
 
Damocles said:
It didn't say they collapsed at "free fall speed" because they didn't. You deliberately ignore what is inconsistent with your fabricated sequence of events. We've spent thread after thread showing you the data of actual scientists that work in that field, you give us links to people who have never designed a building and a mouth engineer then repeat nonsense like "their own footprint."

Throw in a bit of "Theory of Evolution" and viola... you've said something that is "science"...
Click to expand...

You've spent thraed after thread presenting "evidence" that I reject .. just as you've rejected what I've presented.

You can really save valuable keystrokes by selling this bullshit somewhere else.

I am among millions of Americans who question 9/11.

Let me repeat, I have NO doubt how this story ends. The more we look at Afghanistan, the more questions will be raised.

If you don't believe that .. then my questions should be of no concern to you .. just as your "evidence" is no concern to me.
 
blackascoal said:
You've spent thraed after thread presenting "evidence" that I reject .. just as you've rejected what I've presented.

You can really save valuable keystrokes by selling this bullshit somewhere else.

I am among millions of Americans who question 9/11.

Let me repeat, I have NO doubt how this story ends. The more we look at Afghanistan, the more questions will be raised.

If you don't believe that .. then my questions should be of no concern to you .. just as your "evidence" is no concern to me.
Click to expand...
The main reason I try is because you show some capacity for thought, just not in this particular case. It's disconcerting to watch a friend fall for this rubbish.
 
Superfreak said:
http://www.debunking911.com/freefall.htm

Once again we will post this for the truly ignorant on the board. Hopefully this time a certain moron will actually READ the data and the SCIENCE that states the buildings DID NOT FALL AT FREE FALL SPEED.

But as we all know... our certain moron will simply ignore this once again in order to preserve his idiocy.
Click to expand...

Speed of Fall
The Towers' Tops Fell Virtually Unimpeded
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/freefall.html

How fast did WTC7 .. the mystery building that wasn't hit by a planbe fall?

Rate of Building 7's Fall
WTC 7's Facade Plunged at a Nearly Free-Fall Rate
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc7/speed.html
 
Damocles said:
The main reason I try is because you show some capacity for thought, just not in this particular case. It's disconcerting to watch a friend fall for this rubbish.
Click to expand...

I appreciate your concern brother, but I've been right about a lot of my observations in life .. and I'm right about this. This nation has a history of creating false flags for war and even watching innocent people die for war.

You act as though we don't engage in anything but the pure of heart. As if history doesn't exist. .. even recent history.

What is most troubling is that we can't have the conversation without name-calling and hysteronics .. even from people who have been wrong about every damn thing they've said about every damn thing.

Also individually calling for a new inquiry are two dozen retired U.S. military brass and eight former U.S. State Department officials, along with a number of Republicans who have served in high federal positions since President Reagan, including former Assistant Treasury Secretary Paul Craig Roberts and former Reagan administration Assistant Defense Secretary (and retired Marine Corps colonel) Ronald D. Ray.

Are all those people and the millions of Americans like me all lunatics and tin-foil hat wearers .. or could it be that there are legitimate questions that people all over the world have about these events? Is everybody stupid except those who agree with you?

There is no possibility of engaging in any real sane conversation here about this .. I acknowledge that. I'm resigned to waiting for further events to unfold, as I'm absolutely sure they will.
 
blackascoal said:
I appreciate your concern brother, but I've been right about a lot of my observations in life .. and I'm right about this. This nation has a history of creating false flags for war and even watching innocent people die for war.

You act as though we don't engage in anything but the pure of heart. As if history doesn't exist. .. even recent history.

What is most troubling is that we can't have the conversation without name-calling and hysteronics .. even from people who have been wrong about every damn thing they've said about every damn thing.

Also individually calling for a new inquiry are two dozen retired U.S. military brass and eight former U.S. State Department officials, along with a number of Republicans who have served in high federal positions since President Reagan, including former Assistant Treasury Secretary Paul Craig Roberts and former Reagan administration Assistant Defense Secretary (and retired Marine Corps colonel) Ronald D. Ray.

Are all those people and the millions of Americans like me all lunatics and tin-foil hat wearers .. or could it be that there are legitimate questions that people all over the world have about these events? Is everybody stupid except those who agree with you?

There is no possibility of engaging in any real sane conversation here about this .. I acknowledge that. I'm resigned to waiting for further events to unfold, as I'm absolutely sure they will.
Click to expand...

I'm with you, man. This was totally an inside job. The assholes will kill anyone to perpetuate their war machine.

Ebony And Ivory
live together in perfect harmony
side by side on my piano keyboard
oh lord
why don't we
 
blackascoal said:
Speed of Fall
The Towers' Tops Fell Virtually Unimpeded
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/collapses/freefall.html

How fast did WTC7 .. the mystery building that wasn't hit by a planbe fall?

Rate of Building 7's Fall
WTC 7's Facade Plunged at a Nearly Free-Fall Rate
http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/wtc7/speed.html
Click to expand...

Now look at our two sites.... yours says it occured in about 13 seconds... mine in roughly 14. Both sites state that they do not know for sure due to the cloud. That said, free fall speed is roughly 9 seconds (that is backed up by actual calculations... something your site does not do). So even at 13 seconds, that shows there was resistance. It was slow at first (as your site also states) and then it accelerated (which makes sense given that each subsequent floor would be met with greater force and thus offer less resistance).
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top