moon
Satire for Sanity
I am not talking to you till you stop thread banning me, CUNT.
Grow some balls!
Eurotophobia is the last refuge of the moron.
I am not talking to you till you stop thread banning me, CUNT.
Grow some balls!
Eurotophobia is the last refuge of the moron.
Limbaugh is a BROADCAST - not interactive media I just told you thisNot just spreading lies, rather spreading lies that they see have the potential to inspire violence, and how can it be “elastic” when it did that very thing last Wednesday
And again, above and beyond anything else, they are public entities, it is their decision, got nothing to do with “rules,” as I said, is Rush Limbaugh “limiting free speech” when he doesn’t allow callers who don’t fit the script on the air?
CALLING FOR VIOLENCE is not a "potential" call to violence that twitter/FB etc useshttps://www.yahoo.com/finance/news/parler-reportedly-removed-posts-trump-232421829.html
[h=1]Parler reportedly removed posts by Trump affiliate Lin Wood calling for execution of VP Mike Pence[/h]
Someone should tell right wingers. They love to ban more than they allege to love our First Amendment."silencing people is what happens in China" (Nikki Haley). True. And cannot be argued against.
She is more upset at Twitter banning Trump than she is about the takeover at the Capitol?
F’ed up priorities.
She also posted "There are no excuses or defense for this moment. There is only one way forward. Those who broke the law must be punished. We must condemn those responsible. We must recommit ourselves to upholding our American ideals. And we must all promise: We will never let this happen again."
Agreed, Nikki. Protect American ideals from all terrorists and terrorist supporters, foreign and domestic.
Weasel words.
It’s easy to say that those who broke the law should be punished, but if push came to shove she will never tell us if she believes Trump broke the law. Unless polling becomes more definitive on the issue.
Big thread ban lists are choosing to live with fingers in ones ears....they are iron clad proof of fragility.
Someone should tell right wingers. They love to ban more than they allege to love our First Amendment.
Not me; I can resort to the fewest fallacies, unlike right wingers.Little confused there Daniel?
Not me; I can resort to the fewest fallacies, unlike right wingers.
I would believe you, but you have no "gospel Truth", only fallacy.By that answer you are definitely confused. That is a common trait of the left.
I would believe you, but you have no "gospel Truth", only fallacy.
It is not deep for me at all; I resort to the fewest fallacies for sublime Truth (value) purposes, not you.Keep digging that hole. Guess it is not deep enough for you yet.