Sales taxes are not attached to the locality you live in, and do you really want double digit sales taxes?Why not lean on sales tax instead?
Sales taxes are not attached to the locality you live in, and do you really want double digit sales taxes?Why not lean on sales tax instead?
Okay. THERE's a total loss. Kids graduating from public school can't functionally read or write, can't do basic arithmetic, and have no understanding of history or science.Schools are paid for by property taxes.
'We'?? Are you having schizophrenic issues again?All people should pay for the services we supply.
What society supplies is products in a business, voluntarily sold at an agreed upon price.You want to pay no taxes and use all the stuff that society supplies.
Inversion fallacy.You Trumpys are so easily fooled and illogical.
You are just one person, Sybil. You don't provide anything.The wealthier you are, the more we provide for you.
Taxes are not a gift, Sybil.Yet, the smaller tax rate is a gift to them.
Canned chant from the Church of Karl Marx.Damn, are you a suckup to the super-rich.
There are almost no effective schools anyway. No loss.No property tax, no schools ,no fire depts, no libraries , no EMS
There are a number of problems even with the constitutionality of the proposal. Congress, not trump, decides federal taxes. This is not even federal taxes, but taxes through the state. The constitution does not seem to even allow Congress to take away this state right.
The way to do this is to have states ban property taxes.
There is a problem beyond that. Property taxes fund a lot of local and state government. It is the way that schools, local police, and roads are funded. There are other taxes that help with all them, but losing property taxes would make a huge hole in local government. In many places, it is the vast majority of local taxes.
trump appears to be claiming that the federal government can just increase their taxes and redistribute the money. he appears to want to cut local schools in areas that did not vote for him.
Unless you rent? So someone has a million dollar home, they get it tax free. Someone rents an apartment, they pay property taxes indirectly?
From his own link:
There are some states that have lower property taxes on senior citizens or disabled veterans, but they pay for that through higher taxes on the rest.
There is no populated part of the USA without any police. If there are no local police, the state police fill in. If there are no state police, federal police fill in. We do not allow there to be a place without law enforcement.
Schools in the USA are mostly funded by property taxes.
No, it doesn't. A private school can be entirely funded by subscription or tuition.Arizona requires private schools to be funded by property taxes, so back where we started.
Oh boy, I'm not trying to be rude, but a serious talk about ditching the property tax disaster would be nice if there were actual proposals on the table and you were genuinely up for debating a solution. First, we'd need to agree it's a problem. I think it is, for reasons I've already laid out. A working-class family that made smart choices on location, poured in sweat and money, and paid every penny of their loan with taxed dollars (like more than once) should own their property outright.Sales taxes are not attached to the locality you live in, and do you really want double digit sales taxes?
You want to amend the Constitution to not only take away all states' rights, but to give the president absolute power without checks and balances? What happens if a Democrat is the next President?That's why we should amend the constitution.
So poor children should be banned from education through no fault of their own?Schools could be funded in good part by subscription. That is, parents pay part of the cost of sending their kids to a school just like they do for state run colleges and universities.
Empowerment Scholarship Accounts allow a students private tuition to be paid by taking money from public education.No, it doesn't. A private school can be entirely funded by subscription or tuition.
Are taxes really a problem? We would all love to get everything for free, not having to pay anything for it, not even taxes, but is that reality? Most do not want to live in some failed state without roads, police, of schools, so we gladly pay our taxes to keep things going.First, we'd need to agree it's a problem.
One of the problems with homeownership is it ties people to places where they end up being less productive. It pulls money from productive investments into owner more and more expensive houses. I am not arguing it is all bad, but it is not all good.A working-class family that made smart choices on location, poured in sweat and money, and paid every penny of their loan with taxed dollars (like more than once) should own their property outright.
WTF, you utter imbecile? I can’t take your questions or comments seriously when your reading comprehension is nonexistent and your intellect is a complete void. How am I supposed to answer that drivel?Are taxes really a problem? We would all love to get everything for free, not having to pay anything for it, not even taxes, but is that reality? Most do not want to live in some failed state without roads, police, of schools, so we gladly pay our taxes to keep things going.
Well, damn, Wally, you’re waving that Marxist flag like a true brainwashed soldier. The stupidity here is so thick it could block out the sun. Private property, the right to bear arms, and free speech are the holy trinity of freedom, but you and your libtard comrades can’t stop trying to torch them.One of the problems with homeownership is it ties people to places where they end up being less productive. It pulls money from productive investments into owner more and more expensive houses. I am not arguing it is all bad, but it is not all good.