IBDaMann
Well-known member
"Bozo" is a proper name and needs to be capitalized.
Should federal troops be policing the states?
- Thread starter Jarod
- Start date
It is not a proper name you retarded buffoon.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Too funny! Did that come from you?
IBDaMann
Well-known member
Too funny! The cornerstone of Democrat lawfare is the unification of power under Democrat-appointed judges who can block all opposition from the Legislative and Executive branches, while simultaneously protecting Democrats by sealing damning Epstein grand jury testimony, as an example.
IBDaMann
Well-known member
SmarterthanYou
rebel
I see that you're one of those whose selective love of law enforcement allows a greater degree of cognitive dissonance..........
The enormous amount of legally contrived protections for cops who violate both the law and the constitutional rights of citizens is beyond anything that the founders would have allowed.
Ignorance of the law is no excuse, unless you're a cop. The courts have said many times that cops are allowed to make mistakes in good faith, meaning all they have to say is that thought that said suspect broke a law, even though there is no law broken, and the good faith exception applies.
Cops are allowed to lie to 'suspects', but if a civilian lies to a cop during some investigation, that civilian can be charged for lying to law enforcement.
exigent circumstances
furtive movements, rapidly evolving situations
we live in a world where police can panic at the mere thought of danger to themselves, but civilians must be cool, calm, and collected with a gun in their face.
I don't expect you to acknowledge any of this as anything other than 'cops must be allowed to do their job without fear of losing their lives or livelihoods'.................which is the perfect representation of someone who is terrified of the freedom of others.
SmarterthanYou
rebel
you are lying. you only want separation of powers because a republican is president. ICE is not his own police force. ICE existed long before trump.
Simply not true.
{ Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934, allowing the President to negotiate trade agreements without separate congressional approval each time.
Later acts, such as the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and the Trade Act of 1974,}
Can Presidents Set Tariffs Alone? - U.S. Constitution.net
Constitutional Basis for Tariff Authority Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution vests the power to lay and collect tariffs with Congress. The Founding Fathers intended for legislative oversight on taxation, tariffs, and related financial matters, viewing tariffs as strategic levers to be...
www.usconstitution.net
And be happy in the knowledge that you of the radical left are who empowered the executive to have control of tariffs.
Your claim is simply untrue. Tariffs have been under the domain of the President since the reign of King Franklin.
Again, untrue. The DC police falsified reports given to the FBI. I've documented this extensively.
Very likely higher. The invasion you supported is over - but the colonists are still here.
You deny that the United States has the right to have a border and determine who may enter, who is eligible for benefits, who may vote. You demand that any person from any place can simply come in and have equal or greater rights than American citizens.
Yes, you deny that the USA has the right to exist - no nation can exist without borders.
They are terrorists - paramilitary crime organizations who use terror to obtain and retain political and economic control.
That you seek the destruction of this nation does not change reality.
You're not doing anything but bleating MSDNC talking points. You can't support your claims - you just know that Orange Man Bad kept the dream of a Marxist dictatorship from taking hold - and it makes you mad.
Into the Night
Verified User
He just did.
Into the Night
Verified User
Nope. He is enforcing federal law.
Organized crime is against federal law.
Interfering with a federal officer in the performance of his duty is against federal law.
Attacking federal installations is against federal law.
Harboring illegal aliens is against federal law.
Trump is authorized to quell domestic violence and/or insurrection and bring law and order to the streets.
Chicago is next...then onto other cities where federal laws are being broken.
Trump should arrest any government employee, whether elected or not, that is harboring illegal aliens or those breaking federal laws.
Into the Night
Verified User
Enforcing federal law.
Into the Night
Verified User
DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE, PRETENDER!
The Constitution of the United States authorizes the President to enforce the law, especially federal laws.
Into the Night
Verified User
Don't let 'em know. We WANT them to lose the midterms.
Not just deferred - transferred authority through Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934.
@ZenMode is melting down because in 2021 he, along with the rest of the left were convinced that the Stalinist Dictatorship they dreamed of had arrived. Children were arrested for going to playgrounds, surfers arrested for going in the ocean alone. Millions of business forced to close by the governments. People forcibly fired if they didn't take experimental drugs. Those who were in the wrong political party were arrested in 4 AM raids that were broadcast across the nation on the party propaganda channels. Absolute censorship of any and all dissent on social media.
Joseph Stalin had returned and was dictator of America - it was the peak of the democrats, what they had always struggled to create.
But from that lofty height, it all came crashing down. People pushed back. The censorship was challenged - the Gestapo actions of the FBI were taken to court and the Junta was losing. Lawfare against enemies raged - but was highly unpopular. The jellyfish Republicans started to stand up to the Marxists - and it brought about wins in the midterms.
And then the unthinkable happened, the failed assassination by the democrats in Butler made Trump a martyr and became a springboard to expose the lawfare and dirty tricks Obama and his goons had been engaged in - and Trump won the presidency.
Not only will Zen not get the Marxist dictatorship he wants - the socialists are marginalized and hated. democrats may well NEVER win the presidency again. They are fractured into the Mandani-AOC wing and the Obama corruptocrats.
I understand why he is bitter - he thought he had it all, and it was all taken away. BUT he'll always have North Korea waiting for him.
ZenMode
Well-known member
Calling out that he's a liar isn't obsessing.
Mostly by misusing exec power.
Great!
I've provided many more than several. If you had an ounce of honesty in you, I wouldn't need to point out most of them.
His tariffs. His handlo, specifically, of China trade agreement where China just leveraged Trump's horrible negotiating skills to agree to allowing hundreds of thousands of Chinese spies into our universities every year.
Yes, because he is constantly saying and doing dumb things.
The link to the Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934?
Oh, you're just lying again - carry on Comrade..
ZenMode
Well-known member
The president has emergency powers to impose tariffs. That's why he did his pretend financially emergency as an excuse to do what he did. The fake emergency was the basis for his misusing executive powers. Yes, in certain situations a president should change tariffs for one or a small number of countries. That is not what he did.Simply not true.
{ Reciprocal Trade Agreements Act of 1934, allowing the President to negotiate trade agreements without separate congressional approval each time.
Later acts, such as the Trade Expansion Act of 1962 and the Trade Act of 1974,}
Can Presidents Set Tariffs Alone? - U.S. Constitution.net
Constitutional Basis for Tariff Authority Article I, Section 8 of the U.S. Constitution vests the power to lay and collect tariffs with Congress. The Founding Fathers intended for legislative oversight on taxation, tariffs, and related financial matters, viewing tariffs as strategic levers to be...
And be happy in the knowledge that you of the radical left are who empowered the executive to have control of tariffs.
Under certain conditions. Emergency. Again, that is why he declared a financial emergency.
There's no evidence of that.
Is absolutely not higher and is significantly lower.
What a dumb strawman argument. I want a secure border as much as anyone. That is a completely separate topic from Trump's fake emergencies.
Again, strawman argument. Has nothing to do with a discussion about Trump's fake emergencies.
They are not terrorists. We all know what a terrorist is. That includes you. Why are you letting Trump convince you of stupid shit?
Do you think before you type?
Sure, Jan.
Into the Night
Verified User
So LeftNut is not supposed to talk about the President of the United States because you think IBDaMann is a brain dead bozo, Hugo??
...or are you referring to LeftNut?
Into the Night
Verified User
What? Congress passes laws and Trump enforces them? What makes no sense, Sybil?
No they don't. They want to discard all powers and reserve to their oligarchy or dictatorship.
Democrat is not spelled 'T' 'r' 'u' 'm' 'p'.
Good! It's about time Trump brings law and order to cities!
Good! It's about time Trump brings law and order to cities!
Trump did not create ICE, Sybil. CONGRESS did.
Enforcing the law is in the Constitution, Sybil. DON'T TRY TO HIDE BEHIND THE CONSTITUTION YOU DESPISE!
Good! It's about time to get rid of activist judges that break the law!