Should federal troops be policing the states?

[zymurgy]

So you got nothing. Not surprising.

again - nothing about the thread subject

just a troll smearing shit

 

[zymurgy]

I don't think these bots should be allowed to argue politics.

I don't think retards like you can recognize a person from a bot

 

[Damocles]

Perhaps you should put me on forced ignore?

Nah, I'll just scroll. I have never put anyone on ignore. And the software doesn't allow y'all to ignore moderators.

I wouldn't anyway. Forced ignore is for folks who cannot seem to follow the rules when they converse with each other. This isn't that kind of thing.

 

[LurchAddams]

I think he's doing it one at a time, and likely the places with sanctuary policies first.

No, ICE "bugged out" of St. Louis over that controversy of ICE deporting that Vietnamese lady who had owned a restaurant in Missouri for years. Remember ICI "disappeared" her and ended up bringing her back.

No, this is about harassment of people who don't vote trumptard, plain and simple.

 

[LurchAddams]

I don't think these bots should be allowed to argue politics.

Then don't argue with one, idiot!

 

[LichGold]

Then don't argue with one, idiot!

Who says i'm arguing with you, bot? You'd have to put up an argument before you could argue it.

 

[Jarod]

Biden DID do that, so did Obama, Bush, Clinton, Reagan, Carter, Ford, Nixon, Johnson, Kennedy, Eisenhower, Truman, FDR - all the way back to George Washington.

But you China first democrats think somehow Trump isn't really president and you can deny him the power of the presidency. You are very wrong. I know that the tariffs are hurting China - which angers you, and helping America, which infuriates you. Don't worry - you won't get over it.

Neither you nor I will live long enough to see another democrat elected president. And I plan to live another 30 years.

False, link us up!

 

[SmarterthanYou]

I don't know why any of y'all are complaining about this anyway. almost every single one of you wants government to have ultimate police power and you're happy with letting the courts sort it out, so sit down, shut the fuck up, and file a lawsuit.

 

[IBDaMann]

You didn't answer my question. Are you having a spastic attack? You kept repeating the name Trump.

After you finally learn to read, we'll be able to work on the concept of "context." The person who reads posts to you can help you better understand.

 

[ZenMode]

yes, but congress has deferred to the president for decades on tariffs - since 1934 to be exact

Nope. There have been multiple official trade policies (GATT, WTO, NAFTA, etc)

why is this all of a sudden an issue shit stain?

Because Trump is dumb, doesn't know how to do math or understand tariffs.

 

[IBDaMann]

You didn't answer my question.

What question are you claiming to have clearly articulated?

Are you having a spastic attack?

Poor grammar: incomplete sentence. Who or what are you suggesting that I am having a spastic attack?

 

[IBDaMann]

You're not supposed to talk about the President of the United States.

Why is AProudLefty not supposed to talk about the President of the United States?

 

[zymurgy]

Nope. There have been multiple official trade policies (GATT, WTO, NAFTA, etc)

haha. you are trying too hard. little has changed since 1934 dufus

A Brief History of the Constitution and Tariffs | Constitution Center

The subject of tariffs is back in the news after President Donald Trump raised tariffs this week on China and is in negotiations with Canada and Mexico over trade conditions.

constitutioncenter.org

Because Trump is dumb, doesn't know how to do math or understand tariffs.

doesn't excuse you for your lies and ignorance

 

[IBDaMann]

I care little about what he says because he has no filter.

Then why do you obsess over what Donald Trump says?

He has no concern for honesty or accuracy.

Then how is Trump keeping his campaign promises?

He's like a crazy person sitting on a park bench in Central Park.

If a crazy person sitting on a park bench in Central Park is making America great again, then we should probably elect him President.

I care about what he does

You have never been able to provide a single example of any official Presidential action that has made Donald Trump somehow less than the best US President Ev-Ah.

That's right, you are unable to specify anything Trump has done that somehow harms America. All you have is "Did ya' hear what Trump said? Did ya'? Did ya'? Did ya' hear what Trump said?"

and what he's doing is making up pretend emergencies

List your top ten "pretend emergencies" that Trump "made up" that are hurting America through misuse of executive power.

1. ___________________________________________

2. ___________________________________________

3. ___________________________________________

4. ___________________________________________

5. ___________________________________________

 

[IBDaMann]

I think that it’s not a delegable power.

Link? Since when is Congress unable to pass a law regarding the levying of duties to which the President must adhere?

 

[IBDaMann]

It does not say the Executive has the power to enforce tariffs.

... nor does the menu at Olive Garden say it either. Read the specific laws that do say it, i.e. laws passed by Congress, who do have the Constitutional power to make those laws.

If you don't like Donald Trump having the legal authority to affix tariff values in the tariff schedule, complain to Congress and have them change the laws. Don't attack Trump for following the law to the letter.

 

[IBDaMann]

If Biden had done that, you would have been insane.

Here our little game ends. Biden's handlers did do that. In May 2024, Biden's handlers increased tariffs on approximately $18 billion worth of imports from China, under the very same laws Trump operates.

Look them up.

 

[Tobytone]

I wasn't referencing the national guard or the military. I was specifically talking about law enforcement agents and agencies

Ok then, please explain yourself unless it's just a case of unjustified paranoia. Law enforcement allows people to exercise their rights, not the opposite. My point was that more law enforcement means more freedom for law abiding citizens. To be more accurate, having the right amount of law enforcement affords law abiding citizens more freedom.

How can you determine the 'right' number of police? It's really simple, anywhere crime is a problem add more police until the problem is remedied, that may mean 1 or 100, whatever it takes. Crime problem solved, guaranteed. How does that harm anyone but those breaking the law? What exactly are you talking about? Be specific please.

How do you imagine the police infringing on your ability to pursue life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness? If you're idea of happiness is buying an eight ball on the weekend, you might have a problem. In this country if you're really bummed about not being able to find an eight ball on the weekends you can start a political movement and freely speak about it and promote it and do anything legal to achieve your dream of legalizing cocaine for recreational use. What's not to love?

 

[Hume]

Why is AProudLefty not supposed to talk about the President of the United States?

buzz off you brain dead bozo

 

[Nordberg]

I don't know why any of y'all are complaining about this anyway. almost every single one of you wants government to have ultimate police power and you're happy with letting the courts sort it out, so sit down, shut the fuck up, and file a lawsuit.

That, as usual for you, makes no sense. The Dems want the separation of powers to stay. Trump is tearing it down. Even rightys should by now see how he is militarizing the streets. He is in the process of controlling the policing of America. He even started his own police force, ICE, that is loyal to him, not the Constitution. He is working hard to take over the courts, too.