shooting fish in a barrel

any of you cocksucking gun grabbers heard of this before? because bumpstock or not, that's effectively what was happening in vegas.

The bump stock allowed Paddock to send more lead in less time killing and maiming many more than would have been possible without it.

The fish stood less of a chance with automatic weapons fire.
 
He found a venue where he had the unarmed people at a real
disadvantage , not able to defend
themselves . Is the usual case of the chicken Shit Assasins who
Do the mass murders. Are real punks never face to face .


Sent from my LGMS550 using Tapatalk
 
The bump stock allowed Paddock to send more lead in less time killing and maiming many more than would have been possible without it.

The fish stood less of a chance with automatic weapons fire.

No; the fish "essentially" stood a better chance. due to the inaccuracies involving distance and recoil.

:truestory:
 
He found a venue where he had the unarmed people at a real
disadvantage , not able to defend
themselves . Is the usual case of the chicken Shit Assasins who
Do the mass murders. Are real punks never face to face .


Sent from my LGMS550 using Tapatalk

I'm waiting to see the report on how many rounds he "essentially" fired and how many of them were direct hits, instead of ricochets; because I've got a feeling that the percentage between fired and hit is going to "essentially" be lower then it would normally be expected.
 
The bump stock allowed Paddock to send more lead in less time killing and maiming many more than would have been possible without it.

The fish stood less of a chance with automatic weapons fire.

yet your communist loving fucktard ass is wholeheartedly approving of government having the same killing power..............
 
I'll just leave this here.


1k3t.jpg
 
When they were packed in there like sardines??

But it needs to be taken into account; that once the shooting started, people began scattering, the recoil(s) tend to cause the weapon to travel off target, and when you're talking the length of a football field, it doesn't take much to make the shot go way off target.
Like I had said; I would like to see how many were directly shot, compared to the number of rounds fired.
I'd bet that most were hit by ricochets; which of course doesn't minimize the "essential" threat.

Personally, if I had the choice; I would rather be hit directly, instead of a ricochet.
A ricochet has the ugly factor of the round becoming less cylindrical and thereby causing a bigger wound at impact; even though it has lost speed, now it also probably has sharp edges.
 
Last edited:
No; the fish "essentially" stood a better chance. due to the inaccuracies involving distance and recoil.

:truestory:

if that BZA army terrorist murderer used a stupid bumpsrocks thing or whatever; many lives were saved. he would have been wasting 80% of all rounds fired. this whole thing is a production. it is a canned crisis carried out by a superhero [by the delusion] of Barack's Zombie Apocalypse army. ... it is hard to believe that a city like las vegas would not have drone surveillance continually. if stupid old me was charged with defending a space from terrorists I would have that placed "covered".
 
Last edited:
I'm waiting to see the report on how many rounds he "essentially" fired and how many of them were direct hits, instead of ricochets; because I've got a feeling that the percentage between fired and hit is going to "essentially" be lower then it would normally be expected.

Here's your "essentially", fucking moron.

M60 machine gun: 500-650 rpm
M240 machine gun: 650-950 rpm
Bump stock: 400-800 rpm
 
I'm waiting to see the report on how many rounds he "essentially" fired and how many of them were direct hits, instead of ricochets; because I've got a feeling that the percentage between fired and hit is going to "essentially" be lower then it would normally be expected.

Nobody gives a fuck about your feelings, cocksucker.
 
Back
Top