Shoe in the face, he kinda deserved it!

I didn't say it was protected speech, but it is speech nonetheless.

I agree. The Constitution says... "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech." But we do in this type of case...


It also says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the Security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." But the Republicans say this is absolute!

Why is freedom of speech not absolute but Arms is?
 
They should both be absolute.

And our government should be running a surplus.

And money should shower from the heavens.
 
They should both be absolute.

And our government should be running a surplus.

And money should shower from the heavens.

I sould be allowed to yell "fire" in a full theater when I know full well no fire exists?
 
Yeah you should, because the resulting infringement of liberty from outlawing it is too great in my personal opinion. Obviously you and the SCOTUS disagree.
 
How about the N word ? Should anyone be legally penalized for using it?

How about telling an enemy of the USA something which would endanger the USA ?

How about a TV show promoting child abuse ? A web site ?
 
I agree. The Constitution says... "Congress shall make no law... abridging the freedom of speech." But we do in this type of case...


It also says, "A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the Security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed." But the Republicans say this is absolute!

Why is freedom of speech not absolute but Arms is?

Freedom to bear arms is not absolute in that there are no restrictions or regulations. We have gun laws on the books. To pretend there aren't any or that "republicans say the second is absolute' is idiotic as it is not the case.
 
Juuuust a bit outside!
Here's the windup... and the pitch...ohhh almost beaned him! that was a close one.
its 2 balls and no strikes Bush still at bat...
 
I hope it was worth it for the pinhead hack who threw his shoes. Looks like he'll spend about 3 years in the Iraqi pokey. Good thing it didn't happen in the US, he would likely be looking at a 20 year minimum for attacking the president. Ironically, the charges against this cat are not regarding the target of his shoes, but the fact he did this in front of the Iraqi prime minister, a most serious offense in Iraq, apparently.

It's amazing how the left-wing loonies are latching on to this story, in an almost 'cheerleader' type fashion, as if they wish it could have been them throwing the shoes. I heard one pinhead say today, he thought this would be the press conference to define the Iraq War... I think he has been sniffing the liquid paper.

My concern is this... One shoe, okay, I can see how that could happen, but BOTH shoes? Where the fuck was the Secret Service? What if this guy had been like Richard Reid and had exploding shoes? It's frightening to think the guy had the time to remove both of his shoes and hurl them at Bush, before he could be subdued. I watched the video, and you don't even see a Secret Service agent near Bush until it's all over.

Other than that, I am reminded of the words of Austin Powers who once encountered the same sort of attack.... "Who throws a shoe?"
 
Yeah, this is pretty much the press conference that you're going to see replayed for the rest of your life, Dix. When people do a documentary on the Iraq war, this'll be there. Trust me.
 
Right now, 16 or the top 20 most viewed videos for the day are Bush getting a shoe thrown at him. What a great gift for Bush to give history on his way out. How better to remember the biggest presidential failure of all time?
 
I can see the huge security risk this exposed.

But I also love the absurdity of it. How great is it that the POTUS is on video ducking shoes?
 
This guy has found a place in history.

Mid East press glee at shoe throw

The hurling of a pair of shoes at George Bush by an Iraqi journalist has revealed the full extent of the US president's unpopularity in the Middle East's media, with newspapers across the region taking delight in his discomfort.
Most commentators see it as beyond doubt that the treatment meted out to Mr Bush by Iraqi journalist Muntadar al-Zaidi is a just response to the president's policies in Iraq, although one chides the shoe-thrower for expressing his protest through violence rather than "tough questions".

The incident is also seen as a warning to US President-elect Barack Obama that he must tread carefully in the Middle East if he wants a gentler send-off from the region at the end of his presidency.

MUHAMMAD BARAKAT IN EGYPT'S AL-AKHBAR

This extraordinary shot of the flying shoe involves a clear response by Iraqis to what Bush has been saying in the past five years about the great gains the Iraqi people have achieved as a result of the invasion, the occupation and the US destruction of their homes and state.

GHAZI AL-DADA IN SYRIA'S TISHRIN

When it became evident that George Bush, the outgoing US president, is incapable of understanding all that is being said about his rash policies, in all the languages of the world, it was necessary to invent a new language that Bush might understand, and it was the language of shoe-throwing.

GEORGE HADDAD IN JORDAN'S AL-DUSTUR

This terrible insult, which was richly deserved fully deserved by the lying war-criminal president, puts more pressure on the US president-elect to extricate his country from its entanglement in world affairs.

MUSIB NUAIMI IN IRAN'S ARABIC-LANGUAGE AL-VEFAGH

Iraqi journalist Muntadar al-Zaidi's shoes have made history. The shoe he threw at Bush will always haunt [the president] even after he leaves the White House, and will upset him whenever he remembers the incident. This is the end of all tyrants who shed the people's blood and despise human rights in order to achieve their arrogant aspirations.

EDITORIAL IN UK-BASED AL-QUDS AL-ARABI

The overwhelming Arab solidarity with the journalist and the fact that he was turned into a hero overnight have proved the extent of the misleading advertising carried out by the US media and the Iraqi officials, who have always been presenting a false picture of the "New Iraq".

AL-AZAB AL-TAYYIB AL-TAHIR IN QATAR'S AL-RAYAH

Zaidi has expressed the pent-up pain and humiliation which Iraqis feel as a result of the violations committed by the occupation forces throughout five years.

YUSUF AL-KUWAYLIT IN SAUDI AL-RIYADH

He [Bush] never expected that the expression of opposition to reach this level of intensity, particularly knowing that, in the oriental tradition, shoes are associated with contempt and dirt.

MUSTAFA AL-SAWWAF IN GAZA'S FILASTIN

This is a farewell suitable for a war criminal and terrorist who led the world towards moral degeneration, terrorism and violence for eight years. The scene of the shoe being thrown is the only one that is suitable for US President George Bush. This is a free Iraqi expressing the feelings of the Iraqi people.

EDITORIAL IN IRAN'S IRAN

Muntadar al-Zaidi's pair of shoes is the symbol of infinite hatred, of not only Iraqi people but also the people of the whole world against America's president because of his arrogant atrocities.

TARIQ AL-HAMID IN AL-SHARQ AL-AWSAT

The Iraqi journalist should have asked tough or embarrassing questions to US President Bush while he was standing near Iraqi Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. However, the journalist opted for shoes instead of questions. He forgot that media attention requires neither violence nor obscenity.

RA'UF SHAHURI IN LEBANON'S AL-ANWAR

This is a warning for the United States' new era. Those who will follow Bush's policies will receive the same farewell at the end of their term in office. Hopefully, Barack Obama will realise that, deep inside, Arab and Muslim peoples wish to bid him farewell with flowers at the end of his term in office.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/middle_east/7785837.stm
 
Last edited:
Freedom to bear arms is not absolute in that there are no restrictions or regulations. We have gun laws on the books. To pretend there aren't any or that "republicans say the second is absolute' is idiotic as it is not the case.

I agree we have gun laws on the books, most Republicans will argue that they are all unconstitutional. Ask the NRA, they are against all gun control.
 
I hope it was worth it for the pinhead hack who threw his shoes. Looks like he'll spend about 3 years in the Iraqi pokey. Good thing it didn't happen in the US, he would likely be looking at a 20 year minimum for attacking the president. Ironically, the charges against this cat are not regarding the target of his shoes, but the fact he did this in front of the Iraqi prime minister, a most serious offense in Iraq, apparently.

It's amazing how the left-wing loonies are latching on to this story, in an almost 'cheerleader' type fashion, as if they wish it could have been them throwing the shoes. I heard one pinhead say today, he thought this would be the press conference to define the Iraq War... I think he has been sniffing the liquid paper.

My concern is this... One shoe, okay, I can see how that could happen, but BOTH shoes? Where the fuck was the Secret Service? What if this guy had been like Richard Reid and had exploding shoes? It's frightening to think the guy had the time to remove both of his shoes and hurl them at Bush, before he could be subdued. I watched the video, and you don't even see a Secret Service agent near Bush until it's all over.

Other than that, I am reminded of the words of Austin Powers who once encountered the same sort of attack.... "Who throws a shoe?"



This will be on the level with GWB's father vomiting on the Prime Minister of Japan toward the end of his presidency.
 
Back
Top