Sharp contrast between Bush handeling of Katrina v. Obama's handeling of Hurricane...

Cut his vacation short & monitored it pretty much constantly; FEMA was universally praised by local officials for their proactive involvement and responsiveness.

Again - all in pretty stark contrast. That's basically the President's role during something like this.

sounds like a bunch of money wasted. I haven't read anything where FEMA was responsive and if all Obama did was cut a vaca short and monitor, then he really didn't do anything to handle it, did he?

looks to me like it's a bunch of liberal blowhards sucking up and praising Obama for absolutely nothing at all.
 
Like it or not, Katrina has become synonymous w/ executive incompetence.

Bush was slow to react, slow to update, slow to respond and slow to understand the urgency. At a time that required immediate, forceful leadership, he was basically absent.

And let's not get started on the horse guy/pal who he put in charge of FEMA. The results of that can be gauged easily in the criticism of FEMA during Katrina, and the praise for FEMA during Irene.

In short, your apologism doesn't have a leg to stand on.

why haven't you criticized Blanco and Nagin like you have Bush?
 
why haven't you criticized Blanco and Nagin like you have Bush?

I have criticized those guys. But they weren't my officials at the time, and I hold POTUS to a much higher standard than local idiots. Oh - and this thread is about the contrast between 2 Presidents.

Have you been taking Yurt lessons or something?
 
Yurt is so defensive about Bush; the argument becomes about "it's all Bush's fault," which is incredibly misleading.

This thread is about the contrast between 2 Presidents during a weather crisis. You can bet that if FEMA blew it or was being criticized right now, Yurt would have a good 5-6 threads going already on that.

you haven't said anything but "it is bush's fault". you haven't once in this thread said bush did something right and i don't recall you ever saying bush did anything right. you don't blame nagin or blanco unless you get called out, then you give lip service to it and immediately go back and put the bulk, if not all, the blame on bush. you lied when you claimed he wasn't monitoring katrina.

i know you get very upset when your bullshit gets called.
 
you haven't said anything but "it is bush's fault". you haven't once in this thread said bush did something right and i don't recall you ever saying bush did anything right. you don't blame nagin or blanco unless you get called out, then you give lip service to it and immediately go back and put the bulk, if not all, the blame on bush. you lied when you claimed he wasn't monitoring katrina.

i know you get very upset when your bullshit gets called.

Why would I say Bush did something right on this thread? He totally botched Katrina from a leadership perspective. Are you in the habit of saying that someone did something right when they completely botch something?

And again - this thread compares 2 Presidents. If you want to start a thread comparing Nagin to the mayor of Ocean City, have at it.

And nice weaseling out of the fact that you realized I didn't say it's "all Bush's fault." Another day, another Yurt lie.
 
is your comment that bush did not monitor katrina true?

yeah right, bush did nothing right with katrina...:rolleyes:

in order to have an honest discussion about bush's fault, you cannot leave out the mayor and governor. bush did not botch katrina, he made some mistakes, but not as bad as you far left wing wackos want people to believe. it is why you so desperately want to avoid talking about nagin and blanco. nagin bears the brunt of criticism. my hunch is you didn't click the factcheck link, that way you can continue to live in a deluded a world.
 
is your comment that bush did not monitor katrina true?

yeah right, bush did nothing right with katrina...:rolleyes:

in order to have an honest discussion about bush's fault, you cannot leave out the mayor and governor. bush did not botch katrina, he made some mistakes, but not as bad as you far left wing wackos want people to believe. it is why you so desperately want to avoid talking about nagin and blanco. nagin bears the brunt of criticism. my hunch is you didn't click the factcheck link, that way you can continue to live in a deluded a world.

Like I said, have at it if you want to start a thread about Nagin. He had a completely different role than Bush in the crisis, and botched his role completely & utterly.

But, this thread is about the comparison between the 2 Presidents. The President is the last line of leadership; he has a big role during a crisis like Katrina. Bush said the Feds were ready the day before, and they weren't. He was slow to react & respond. He appointed a crony to head up FEMA, and that agency was widely criticized during Katrina.

A mayor failing is one thing; a President failing is quite another. You don't have any sense of scale, but it doesn't matter - this thread is comparing Bush w/ Obama.
 
apparently you do not, considering that you still claim that Obama has not continued or extended any Bush policies, even though it's quite clear that he has.

Still obsessed w/ that?

I love how it's now "any" policies, instead of your original "every" policy. The change is noted.
 
Oh, stop, this is ridiculous, each governor handle his states issues admirably and they were prepared and the federal government was able to respond as necessary.

I for one am glad they were prepared for the worst and it didn't happen.

The storm has given us normal folk a chance to watch those afflicted with ODS make utter fools of themselves.

Do these people hear themselves?

It would be nice if just one of them could explain how Obama was able to get the entire broadcast media FROM COAST TO COAST to go along with him while carrying out SF's ridiculous claim...I know it will wind up being some "extension/offshoot" of the whole "liberal media" lie they can't let go of, and I look forward to laughing long and hard at their stupidity.
 
Still obsessed w/ that?

I love how it's now "any" policies, instead of your original "every" policy. The change is noted.

pardon me for not being exact on the statement, but it's difficult for me to accept that you hold POTUS to a higher standard yet excuse or condone Obama continuing some of the worst Bush policies and then claiming that he hasn't.
 
pardon me for not being exact on the statement, but it's difficult for me to accept that you hold POTUS to a higher standard yet excuse or condone Obama continuing some of the worst Bush policies and then claiming that he hasn't.

Too bad I haven't done that. Man, do you have to stop putting words in people's mouths.

"Every" was a pretty crucial difference in your original question; and I answered it - he hasn't continued "every" policy, and even on the ones he has continued, he has modified the policy more than you will allot.

And I have criticized him vehemently on things like Afghanistan. I never criticized Bush for the Patriot Act, and haven't criticized Obama either, so I've been consistent on that (I know that's a big issue w/ you, but we're talking consistency here). I have criticized Obama for Gitmo.
 
Perry shoulda prayed Irene to Texas.



6e3t.jpg
 
Seriously, you guys want to elect a man who can't even get rain after praying for it. How could it be anymore obvious God is not for Perry!
 
BTW, this thread does not say Katrina was Bush's fault. I was just comparing how engaged President Obama is with how unengaged Bush was.
 
Back
Top