several Clinton donors are jurist in Sussman trial

RB 60 said:
Not when they have opinions or ties to the case they don't. And it works both ways.

That said, I don't trust the DOJ. Both prosecution and defense have the same right to pick or reject each member of the jury. They must both agree on each of the number of jurors needed and alternates.
Click to expand...

The judge decides in the end


You know the person running the court


But the judge should recuse if their spouse is involved in the case dont you think?
 
dukkha said:
This jury pool is a nightmare for the prosecutors. There are three Clinton donors on the jury. In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann. So I think for the prosecutors, it seems like the only thing that is missing on the jury is Chelsea Clinton. A jury of your peers is not supposed to mean other Clinton people. :palm:
And so, I think that the prosecutors have quite a challenge with this pool.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/turley-jury-pool-michael-sussmann-trial-nightmare-prosecutors
Click to expand...
Jury nullification
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
As a foreman on the jury you weren't privy to the process that every juror was selected.

The transcript from the day of jury selection clearly shows the judge asking jurors if they can be impartial, and after they say, "yes." telling the prosecution they can use a peremptory strike if they don't like the juror.
Click to expand...

I was part of that selection process. I guess I should have clarified myself. Sorry for overestimating your perception.
 
Concart said:
No it isn't. Being a foreman on a jury doesn't make you an expert. That's obvious in your case. The size of juries is determined by the type of charge. And jurors can be struck for no reason by either side, but they are limited in the number of strikes they are allowed. Only a judge can determine bias. But that point is moot. This case has nothing, NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton. The fact that dukkha and you think it does shows just how ignorant you are.
Click to expand...

And your experience on a Federal jury or the selection process is...?
 
dukkha said:
This jury pool is a nightmare for the prosecutors. There are three Clinton donors on the jury. In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann. So I think for the prosecutors, it seems like the only thing that is missing on the jury is Chelsea Clinton. A jury of your peers is not supposed to mean other Clinton people. :palm:
And so, I think that the prosecutors have quite a challenge with this pool.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/turley-jury-pool-michael-sussmann-trial-nightmare-prosecutors
Click to expand...

That's a conflict of interest.

There's no justice in America anymore. :palm:
 
Hillary's Campaign manager said Hillary personally gave the go ahead to give the fake Trump tower alpha bank server story to the media.
 
dukkha said:
This jury pool is a nightmare for the prosecutors. There are three Clinton donors on the jury. In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann. So I think for the prosecutors, it seems like the only thing that is missing on the jury is Chelsea Clinton. A jury of your peers is not supposed to mean other Clinton people. :palm:
And so, I think that the prosecutors have quite a challenge with this pool.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/turley-jury-pool-michael-sussmann-trial-nightmare-prosecutors
Click to expand...

Why do you think the Prosecutors allowed so many Clinton donors on the jury? Your kid being on the same team as o/c's kid is certainty not a reason for disqualification.
 
dukkha said:
This jury pool is a nightmare for the prosecutors. There are three Clinton donors on the jury. In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann. So I think for the prosecutors, it seems like the only thing that is missing on the jury is Chelsea Clinton. A jury of your peers is not supposed to mean other Clinton people. :palm:
And so, I think that the prosecutors have quite a challenge with this pool.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/turley-jury-pool-michael-sussmann-trial-nightmare-prosecutors
Click to expand...

Oh, oh, I sense the “jury is fixed” rants are predictable if Durham doesn’t get what he wants, shades of 2020, like Trump shouting the Iowa primary was fixed beforehand cause he knew Cruz was going to win, same playbook

If I am not mistaken, in any trial, the prosecutor, along with the defense, picks the jury, they question each candidate from the pool and decide who sits on the jury, in other words, Durham agreed with this jury

Will there ever be another election in America where if the Republican candidate loses they won’t yell “fixed?”
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
Neither Clinton or Trump are on trial. Sussmann is charged with lying to the FBI.
All this frother BS about Clinton people being on the jury is just an attempt to hide the fact that Durham has no case.
Click to expand...
They didn't mind when a biased judge let Rittenhouse off. They didn't mind when someone directly connected to Zimmerman, and lied her way onto the jury was allowed. They love when jury nullification works for them.

They hate it when it works for anyone else.
 
Poor Richard Saunders said:
The defense got to ask Baker about all the other times he testified differently while under oath. Somehow I don't think Baker is a reliable witness since he now remembers clearly something that happened over 6 years ago but doesn't remember what happened the day after when they talked on the phone.

Baker was also under investigation by Durham so has every reason to lie for Durham to prevent being prosecuted. It's amazing how you don't know any of the facts in this case.
Click to expand...
They love to whine, whine, whine.

Four treasonous pieces of crap were pardoned by trump. Add to that a handul of convicted Republicans who used their positions in the House for financial gain.

Not a whimper from them.
 
archives said:
Oh, oh, I sense the “jury is fixed” rants are predictable if Durham doesn’t get what he wants, shades of 2020, like Trump shouting the Iowa primary was fixed beforehand cause he knew Cruz was going to win, same playbook

If I am not mistaken, in any trial, the prosecutor, along with the defense, picks the jury, they question each candidate from the pool and decide who sits on the jury, in other words, Durham agreed with this jury

Will there ever be another election in America where if the Republican candidate loses they won’t yell “fixed?”
Click to expand...
jury process:
the “voir dire” process — in which dozens of potential jurors were questioned by the judge, the prosecution, and the defense — lasted almost the full day, and a full jury was finalized Monday evening. https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/news/sussmann-jury-selected-as-durham-makes-rare-appearance

the "pool" was attorneys / federal employees and retirees
The jury has 3 Dem donor and 1 Republican donor

whatever happened to ordinary lay people??
 
Jarod said:
Why do you think the Prosecutors allowed so many Clinton donors on the jury? Your kid being on the same team as o/c's kid is certainty not a reason for disqualification.
Click to expand...
donors are inherent advocates. The judge shouldn't allow any
It's typical DC insiders ruling on other DC insiders.
If you know the facts of the case there is no doubt Sussman was lying.
Text and Baker testimony back they up.

But I bet you he'll walk -same as the Comey, McCabe ( who got his pension back) etc
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top