several Clinton donors are jurist in Sussman trial

dukkha said:
This jury pool is a nightmare for the prosecutors. There are three Clinton donors on the jury. In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann. So I think for the prosecutors, it seems like the only thing that is missing on the jury is Chelsea Clinton. A jury of your peers is not supposed to mean other Clinton people. :palm:
And so, I think that the prosecutors have quite a challenge with this pool.
https://www.foxnews.com/media/turley-jury-pool-michael-sussmann-trial-nightmare-prosecutors
Click to expand...

Blatant 14th Amendment violation.
 
Concart said:
I'm pretty sure political contributions don't disqualify you for jury duty. Anatta continues to be one of the whiniest, lamest, dumbest posters here.
Click to expand...

I wonder if people who donated to a Go Fund Me account for an accused murderer can sit on his jury.......
 
Althea said:
They didn't mind when a biased judge let Rittenhouse off. They didn't mind when someone directly connected to Zimmerman, and lied her way onto the jury was allowed. They love when jury nullification works for them.

They hate it when it works for anyone else.
Click to expand...

don't recall that......what was this direct connection you refer to?......
 
In the last 24 hours, the judge turned down a motion to dismiss a juror whose daughter is actually playing on the same team with the daughter of Sussmann.
Click to expand...
unreal. the fix is in
 
Concart said:
No it isn't. Being a foreman on a jury doesn't make you an expert. That's obvious in your case. The size of juries is determined by the type of charge. And jurors can be struck for no reason by either side, but they are limited in the number of strikes they are allowed. Only a judge can determine bias. But that point is moot. This case has nothing, NOTHING to do with Hillary Clinton. The fact that dukkha and you think it does shows just how ignorant you are.
Click to expand...

wtf......who was Sussman working for when he lied to the FBI?......
 
RB 60 said:
Then learn comprehension.
Click to expand...

Already learned. The number of jurors is set by law. Only the judge can strike for bias. These are facts. They don’t change because you were a foreman on a jury. Again try reading. Maybe you won’t make a fool of yourself next time.
 
Concart said:
Already learned. The number of jurors is set by law. Only the judge can strike for bias. These are facts. They don’t change because you were a foreman on a jury. Again try reading. Maybe you won’t make a fool of yourself next time.
Click to expand...

Uh, wrong! Either attorney can reject a juror for any reason he/she wants while picking a jury. Why do you think there is 30-40 (or more) people summoned for jury duty if they only need 12 plus alternates? Just for shits and giggles?
 
RB 60 said:
Uh, wrong! Either attorney can reject a juror for any reason he/she wants while picking a jury. Why do you think there is 30-40 (or more) people summoned for jury duty if they only need 12 plus alternates? Just for shits and giggles?
Click to expand...

Nope. Attorneys have a limited number of pre-emptory strikes, and they are not based on bias. The number is set by law. So apparently you can't read. Because this is what I said. It is a fact. ONLY THE JUDGE CAN REMOVE A JUROR FOR BIAS. Period. Full stop. I guess they let anyone be a foreman these days.

Learn to read. It will aide you in your future endeavors.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_24
 
Concart said:
Nope. Attorneys have a limited number of pre-emptory strikes, and they are not based on bias. The number is set by law. So apparently you can't read. Because this is what I said. It is a fact. ONLY THE JUDGE CAN REMOVE A JUROR FOR BIAS. Period. Full stop. I guess they let anyone be a foreman these days.

Learn to read. It will aide you in your future endeavors.

https://www.law.cornell.edu/rules/frcrmp/rule_24
Click to expand...

I said when the prosecution and defense are picking the jury.
I said nothing about removing a juror who was already selected to sit on the jury.
Again, how many juries were you on? I was on one Federal, one criminal and one
civil paternity (which I will never sit on again because of the bias) case. I brought
that up to the judge at the Federal case, which he assured me it was not a paternity
case (it was a triple murder case). That trial lasted 3 weeks. I summoned the judge
numerous times for answers to questions a few other jurors had asked.
Read all you want, but don't tell me what I've experienced first hand when you
apparently never served on a jury.
 
RB 60 said:
I said when the prosecution and defense are picking the jury.
I said nothing about removing a juror who was already selected to sit on the jury.
Again, how many juries were you on? I was on one Federal, one criminal and one
civil paternity (which I will never sit on again because of the bias) case. I brought
that up to the judge at the Federal case, which he assured me it was not a paternity
case (it was a triple murder case). That trial lasted 3 weeks. I summoned the judge
numerous times for answers to questions a few other jurors had asked.
Read all you want, but don't tell me what I've experienced first hand when you
apparently never served on a jury.
Click to expand...

Yes, I'm also talking about that. You get your strikes. If you want someone else disqualified, ONLY THE JUDGE CAN DO THAT. This isn't rocket science. Your appeal to authority is lame. Your experience means nothing. I posted the applicable statute. Read it.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Back
Top