Sessions met with Russian envoy twice last year, encounters he later did not disclose

Assuming info not in evidence, yurtikins? Or do you take lyin' Sessions at his word?

Dearest Christiekins, there is evidence he met in his official capacity. How do you think they know about his meetings? You lied by claiming otherwise. He also met with other ambassadors, is it your claim he did not meet them in his official capacity? Or is it just the Russian?

:rolleyes:
 
I think he said... "I did not have communications with the Russians.”

Had he said, I did not have communications with the Russians as a representative of the Trump campaign, that would not have been a lie. He said something totally different. Just like when Clinton said, "I did not have sex with that woman." He might well have meant vaginal sex, not oral sex.

If Clinton had said, "The question was asking about vaginal sex." would you have said.... oh.. never mind, the question changed the lie into a truth?

Clinton was acquitted, so, technically he didn't lie to Congress. It only sounded like he did.
 
Dearest Christiekins, there is evidence he met in his official capacity. How do you think they know about his meetings? You lied by claiming otherwise. He also met with other ambassadors, is it your claim he did not meet them in his official capacity? Or is it just the Russian?

:rolleyes:

My claim is that if he wanted to be perfectly honest he could have said "I didn’t have — did not have communications with the Russians about the campaign but I did speak with Kislyak about __________."

He also had two months to correct the record about his contact but he didn't do that either.
 
My claim is that if he wanted to be perfectly honest he could have said "I didn’t have — did not have communications with the Russians about the campaign but I did speak with Kislyak about __________."

He also had two months to correct the record about his contact but he didn't do that either.
Because he didn't lie. I notice you've given up your phony claim he didn't meet in his official capacity. He answered the question that was asked, and he did so honestly.
 
Alan Dershowitz says it doesn't rise to the level of perjury as it stands now.

:dunno:
 
Because he didn't lie. I notice you've given up your phony claim he didn't meet in his official capacity. He answered the question that was asked, and he did so honestly.

I don't know if he did or didn't meet in his official capacity and neither do you. All we have is Sessions' word, and I don't believe him.
 
Dershowitz is one of the most rational, unbiased persons out there.

Exactly, but if it smells like crap, they swallow unabashedly. This isn't about rational unbiased persons. This is about a hysterical group of people who deligitimize themselves every single day.

Welcome back, btw.
 
I don't know if he did or didn't meet in his official capacity and neither do you. All we have is Sessions' word, and I don't believe him.
Lol, so all the ambassadors were official, but it just happens the Russian wasn't. That is so far fetched it is laughable. If he was being sneaky, it would not be recorded. Since it was, that is strong evidence it was official.

But since you admit you don't know, then you cannot claim he lied.
 
Lol, so all the ambassadors were official, but it just happens the Russian wasn't. That is so far fetched it is laughable. If he was being sneaky, it would not be recorded. Since it was, that is strong evidence it was official.

But since you admit you don't know, then you cannot claim he lied.

Are you confused? The meeting with the envoy wasn't recorded.
 
KKKhristiefan and GayRod are arguably the dimmest f JPP bulbs

They both deserve to be dragged naked over jagged glass and then have their mangled bodies slowly dipped in isopropyl alcohol.
 
Back
Top