Senators: Benghazi attack ‘likely preventable’

Now we know your not telling the truth. If vapid insults really did make you sleepy, you would be in a coma after reading truth deflector, ishy, postmortem prophet and the like.

any particular reason the newb feels it necessary to draw me into this conversation?.......feeling neglected?......or just nervous about being accepted.....
 
the guy is just a quick and accurate judge of character, or, in your case, lack thereof.

hard to support, given the truly inane posts he's "thanked".....he showed promise when he joined, but he's obviously nothing more than a shallow minded mirror puppet......
 
If you didn't have any evidence that Hillary was directly involved in the decision to not beef us security, why didn't you simply refrain from spamming the board with all this stuff that does NOT answer the question?

so... you don't have any evidence that she was directly involved?

why not just be a man and admit it, piss brain?

so... if you don't have any evidence that Hillary was directly involved - and clearly you don't - why not just be a man and admit it, piss brain?

again... do you have any evidence that she denied that additional security?


Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated on Monday that she is responsible for the security of American diplomatic outposts. The comments by Clinton were made in response to the political firestorm that has surrounded the attack on the Benghazi, Libya US Consulate on September 11.

Clinton stated during a visit to Peru that she “take responsibility” for the protection of US diplomats

How utterly fuckin' lame and sad that a grown man and alleged career officer in our Armed Forces can post these kind of excuses in defense of H. Clinton rather
than just face the truth and reality of the matter .... I'm embarrassed for him and ashamed we served in the same Navy.....

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...of-requests-for-greater-security-in-benghazi/

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/top-us-counterterrorism-adviser-john-brennan-in-libya-amid-questions-over-security-missteps/

[url]http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2013/04/24/benghazi-report-hillary-approved-reduced-security-measures-contradicting-her-testimony-n1576710

[/URL]
 
Last edited:
People die
Usually grunts
No biggy
You conservatards wouldn't said dick had it happened under bush
Your faux outrage is amusing if not cute
 

Hillary Clinton a liar....

(1)
The committees' Republicans conclude that Clinton approved security reductions at the consulate, pointing to evidence such as an April 2012 State Department cable bearing her signature. The cable was a formal request from then-U.S. Ambassador to Libya Gene Cretz for more security. In her testimony before Congress in January, Clinton said, "With specific security requests they didn't come to me. I had no knowledge of them."

(2) The interim report also charges that White House and senior State Department officials attempted to protect the State Department from criticism by altering accurate talking points drafted by the intelligence community. For instance, the report says that, after a Sept. 15, 2012 meeting, administration officials removed references to the likely participation of Islamic extremists.
(3) The report also contradicts administration claims that the talking points were changed to protect classified information. None of the email exchanges reviewed ever mentioned a concern about classified information, according to the report.
 
Secretary of State Hillary Clinton stated on Monday that she is responsible for the security of American diplomatic outposts. The comments by Clinton were made in response to the political firestorm that has surrounded the attack on the Benghazi, Libya US Consulate on September 11.

Clinton stated during a visit to Peru that she “take responsibility” for the protection of US diplomats

How utterly fuckin' lame and sad that a grown man and alleged career officer in our Armed Forces can post these kind of excuses in defense of H. Clinton rather
than just face the truth and reality of the matter .... I'm embarrassed for him and ashamed we served in the same Navy.....

http://abcnews.go.com/blogs/politic...of-requests-for-greater-security-in-benghazi/

http://www.cbsnews.com/news/top-us-counterterrorism-adviser-john-brennan-in-libya-amid-questions-over-security-missteps/

[url]http://townhall.com/tipsheet/guybenson/2013/04/24/benghazi-report-hillary-approved-reduced-security-measures-contradicting-her-testimony-n1576710

[/URL]


a difference between responsibility and direct involvement... I guess you didn't know that. And we may have served in the same Navy, but if we'd ever served on the same ship, you'd have said "how high" every time I told you to jump or I would have railroaded you out with a BCD. How ya like them apples?
 
a difference between responsibility and direct involvement... I guess you didn't know that. And we may have served in the same Navy, but if we'd ever served on the same ship, you'd have said "how high" every time I told you to jump or I would have railroaded you out with a BCD. How ya like them apples?

You're a corrupt piece of trash. I can smell you from here.
 
a difference between responsibility and direct involvement...

(1) The committees' Republicans conclude that Clinton approved security reductions at the consulate, pointing to evidence such as an April 2012 State Department cable bearing her signature. The cable was a formal request from then-U.S. Ambassador to Libya Gene Cretz for more security. In her testimony before Congress in January, Clinton said, "With specific security requests they didn't come to me. I had no knowledge of them."



Hillary Clinton a liar....and so are you....
And How do ya like them apples?

I was right when I said you were a disgrace to the uniform....funny you didn't have an ...."accident" some night going overboard....
 
You are aware that thousands of diplomatic cables are sent with the secretary's "signature".

You were undoubtedly a mediocre sailor at best. E-4 max... only one enlistment is my guess... More than a few trips to Captain's mast for being a surly wiseass...Maybe a general discharge even?
 
You are aware that thousands of diplomatic cables are sent with the secretary's "signature".

You were undoubtedly a mediocre sailor at best. E-4 max... only one enlistment is my guess... More than a few trips to Captain's mast for being a surly wiseass...Maybe a general discharge even?


Excuses, excuses and more excuses.....you've got your head so far up Hillary's ass you can't see daylight and refuse to face reality....
 
Excuses, excuses and more excuses.....you've got your head so far up Hillary's ass you can't see daylight and refuse to face reality....
not excuses. Facts. As I said, she bears some responsibility because it was her department and the buck stops at her desk. But the people primarily responsible for the four American casualties in Benghazi were the islamic terrorists who killed them. Most sane Americans understand that. But I certainly encourage brainless hacks like you to continue to scream about !!!!!BENGHAZI!!!!! from now until Hillary's inauguration. That dog won't do much huntin' come 2016. lol
 
And I was right about your Navy "service" (to use the term loosely), wasn't I?

:lol:

Oh.. an edit: there's a good chance your rating was either BM, CS, HT, or SK... and if you were an HT, the most technical stuff they'd let you do is solder plumbing joints or keep the DC lockers stocked.
 
Last edited:
a difference between responsibility and direct involvement... I guess you didn't know that. And we may have served in the same Navy, but if we'd ever served on the same ship, you'd have said "how high" every time I told you to jump or I would have railroaded you out with a BCD. How ya like them apples?

So now you've revealed that not only are you a gun smuggling lying coward; but you're also a bully, who abuses his authority.
 
You are aware that thousands of diplomatic cables are sent with the secretary's "signature".

You were undoubtedly a mediocre sailor at best. E-4 max... only one enlistment is my guess... More than a few trips to Captain's mast for being a surly wiseass...Maybe a general discharge even?

Is it in the Navy that you started your career goal of sending inappropriate emails to women; because you apparently continued it, during your ministries.
 
If you didn't have any evidence that Hillary was directly involved in the decision to not beef us security, why didn't you simply refrain from spamming the board with all this stuff that does NOT answer the question?

Ah yes; an incredibly partisan dunce who believes that decisions on security never reach the desk of sec State. So are you willfully stupid, merely a dishonest partisan dunce or born this retarded?
 
Now we know your not telling the truth. If vapid insults really did make you sleepy, you would be in a coma after reading truth deflector, ishy, postmortem prophet and the like.

Typed like the brain dead fawning dunce you're desperate to remove any doubt about; yay you!
 
Back
Top